| Literature DB >> 26185058 |
Lin-Quan Ge1, Yi-Ping Jiang1, Ting Xia1, Qi-Sheng Song2, David Stanley3, Peng Kuai1, Xiu-Li Lu1, Guo-Qing Yang1, Jin-Cai Wu1.
Abstract
The brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens, sugar transporter gene 6 (Nlst6) is a facilitative glucose/fructose transporter (often called a passive carrier) expressed in midgut that mediates sugar transport from the midgut lumen to hemolymph. The influence of down regulating expression of sugar transporter genes on insect growth, development, and fecundity is unknown. Nonetheless, it is reasonable to suspect that transporter-mediated uptake of dietary sugar is essential to the biology of phloem-feeding insects. Based on this reasoning, we posed the hypothesis that silencing, or reducing expression, of a BPH sugar transporter gene would be deleterious to the insects. To test our hypothesis, we examined the effects of Nlst6 knockdown on BPH biology. Reducing expression of Nlst6 led to profound effects on BPHs. It significantly prolonged the pre-oviposition period, shortened the oviposition period, decreased the number of eggs deposited and reduced body weight, compared to controls. Nlst6 knockdown also significantly decreased fat body and ovarian (particularly vitellogenin) protein content as well as vitellogenin gene expression. Experimental BPHs accumulated less fat body glucose compared to controls. We infer that Nlst6 acts in BPH growth and fecundity, and has potential as a novel target gene for control of phloem-feeding pest insects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26185058 PMCID: PMC4505327 DOI: 10.1038/srep12194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Dietary dsNlst6 treatments reduced Nlst6 expression.
All values were normalized relative to β-actin transcript levels. The data represent the mean values ± SE of three independent biological replicates. Histogram bars annotated with the same letter are not significantly different between control and dsNlst6 treatments (t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effects of feeding-based dsRNA treatments on body weight of brachypterous females.
Histogram bars show the means ± SE of six independent replicates, each with 5 females; histogram bars annotated with the same letters are not significantly different at a p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effects of feeding-based dsRNA treatments on the protein content of brachypterous female fat bodies (Panels A & C) and ovaries (Panels B & D).
Histogram bars report mean protein content (mg/g, n = 3 independent biological experiments) ± SE Histogram bars annotated with the same letter are not significantly different (t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 4Dietary dsNlst6 treatments led to decreased egg laying (fifteen pairs were analyzed per group).
The histogram bars report mean numbers of eggs laid/female ± SE of 15 replicates. Histogram bars annotated with the same letter are not significantly different (t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effects of feeding-based dsNlst6 treatments on the duration of preoviposition period (Panel A) and oviposition period (Panel B) of brachypterous females.
Histogram bars report numbers of days ± SE, n = 15 independent biological experiments; bars annotated with the same letter are not significantly different at a p < 0.05.
Figure 6Dietary dsNlst6 treatments decreased female longevity.
Histogram bars report longevity in days ± SE, n = 15 independent biological experiments; bars annotated with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 7Effects of feeding-based dsRNA on the glucose content of brachypterous female fat bodies in day 2 (Panel A) and, separately, day 3 (Panel B) adults.
Histogram bars report the mean glucose content (mg/g) ± SE, n = three independent biological experiments; bars annotated with the same letter are not significantly different at a p < 0.05.
Figure 8Dietary dsNlst6 treatments decreased Nlvg mRNA expression in day 2 (Panel A) and, separately, day 3 (Panel B) females.
All values were normalized relative to β-actin transcript level. The data represent the mean values ± SE of three replicates. Histogram bars annotated with the same letter are not significantly different (t-test, p < 0.05). Each treatment and control experiment was repeated three times.
PCR primers used in this study.
| Primers | Primer sequence | Product size |
|---|---|---|
| For real-time PCR | ||
| Q-Nlst6-F | CATCGGAGAAATCGCTGAG | 179 bp |
| Q-Nlst6-R | CTGGCATGAAGAAGAACAAA | |
| Q-Nlvg-F | GTGGCTCGTTCAAGGTTATGG | 200 bp |
| Q-Nlvg-R | GCAATCTCTGGGTGCTGTTG | |
| Actin-F | TGCGTGACATCAAGGAGAAGC | 186 bp |
| Actin-R | CCATACCCAAGAAGGAAGGCT | |
| For dsRNA synthesis | ||
| Nlst6-F | GGAGAAATCGCTGAGGAC | 384 bp |
| Nlst6-R | GCCGCAACTGAGGTAAAG | |
Statistical analyses of biological parameter data.
| Experiment | Significant? | F statistic |
|---|---|---|
| Survival | No | |
| Body weight, day 2 | Yes | |
| Body weight, day 3 | Yes | |
| Fat body protein, day 2 | Yes | |
| Fat body protein, day 3 | Yes | |
| Ovarian protein, day 2 | Yes | |
| Ovarian protein, day 3 | Yes | |
| Fecundity, as eggs laid | Yes | |
| Pre-oviposition period | Yes | |
| Oviposition period | Yes | |
| Female longevity | Yes | |
| Fat body glucose, day 2 | Yes | |
| Fat body glucose, day 3 | Yes | |
| Yes | ||
| Yes | F = 28.6, df = 2, 6, |