E M Krouwel1, J H Hagen2, M P J Nicolai3, A L Vahrmeijer4, H Putter5, R C M Pelger6, H W Elzevier7. 1. Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 WB Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.m.krouwel@lumc.nl. 2. Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 WB Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jelkehagen@gmail.com. 3. Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 WB Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: melianthenicolai@gmail.com. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 WB Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.l.vahrmeijer@lumc.nl. 5. Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 WB Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: h.putter@lumc.nl. 6. Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 WB Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.c.m.pelger@lumc.nl. 7. Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 WB Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: h.w.elzevier@lumc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sexual function is an important factor in quality of life, but at risk after several surgical cancer treatments. Our aim was to identify the practice, responsibility, attitudes, knowledge and barriers of surgical oncologists towards providing informed consent on sexual side effects and sexual counselling. METHODS: A 31-item questionnaire was sent to all 437 members of the Dutch Society for Surgical Oncology (NVCO). RESULTS: The majority of 165 responding surgical oncologists (85.5%) stated that discussing sexual function is their responsibility, 13.0% thought it to be somebody else's responsibility. During informed consent of a planned surgical procedure, sexual side effects are mentioned by 36.6% of surgeons in more than half of the cases. Counselling sexual function was performed by 9.2% of the surgeons in more than half of the cases. Older surgeons (≥46 y) and male surgeons discuss sexual concerns more often (p = 0.006 v p = 0.045). Barriers most mentioned included advanced age of the patient (50.6%), not relevant for all types of cancers (43.8%), lack of time (39.9%) and no angle or motive for asking (35.2%). Additional training on counselling patients for sexual concerns was required according to 46.3%. CONCLUSION: Surgical oncologists do not routinely discuss sexual concerns. Informed consent includes limited information about possible complications on sexual function. Surgeons consider themselves responsible for raising the issue of sexual dysfunction, but consider advanced age of patients, lack of time and no angle or motive for asking as major barriers. Results emphasize the need for raising awareness and providing practical training.
BACKGROUND: Sexual function is an important factor in quality of life, but at risk after several surgical cancer treatments. Our aim was to identify the practice, responsibility, attitudes, knowledge and barriers of surgical oncologists towards providing informed consent on sexual side effects and sexual counselling. METHODS: A 31-item questionnaire was sent to all 437 members of the Dutch Society for Surgical Oncology (NVCO). RESULTS: The majority of 165 responding surgical oncologists (85.5%) stated that discussing sexual function is their responsibility, 13.0% thought it to be somebody else's responsibility. During informed consent of a planned surgical procedure, sexual side effects are mentioned by 36.6% of surgeons in more than half of the cases. Counselling sexual function was performed by 9.2% of the surgeons in more than half of the cases. Older surgeons (≥46 y) and male surgeons discuss sexual concerns more often (p = 0.006 v p = 0.045). Barriers most mentioned included advanced age of the patient (50.6%), not relevant for all types of cancers (43.8%), lack of time (39.9%) and no angle or motive for asking (35.2%). Additional training on counselling patients for sexual concerns was required according to 46.3%. CONCLUSION: Surgical oncologists do not routinely discuss sexual concerns. Informed consent includes limited information about possible complications on sexual function. Surgeons consider themselves responsible for raising the issue of sexual dysfunction, but consider advanced age of patients, lack of time and no angle or motive for asking as major barriers. Results emphasize the need for raising awareness and providing practical training.
Authors: Rita Th E Harmsen; Melianthe P J Nicolai; Brenda L Den Oudsten; Hein Putter; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Peter A Nolte; Barend J Van Royen; Henk Elzevier Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Petra J M van Hees; Anton A van der Plas; Gaby F van Ek; Hein Putter; Brenda L Den Oudsten; Marjolein E M den Ouden; Henk W Elzevier Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Rieky E Dikmans; Esmée M Krouwel; Mahsa Ghasemi; Tim C van de Grift; Mark-Bram Bouman; Marco J P F Ritt; Henk W Elzevier; Margriet G Mullender Journal: Eur J Plast Surg Date: 2018-08-18
Authors: Marcella R Poelman; Henk S Brand; Thymour Forouzanfar; Ellen M Daley; Derk H Jan Jager Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: F B B de Rooy; C Buhmann; B Schönwald; P Martinez-Martin; C Rodriguez-Blazquez; H Putter; H W Elzevier; A A van der Plas Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: E M Krouwel; L F Albers; M P J Nicolai; H Putter; S Osanto; R C M Pelger; H W Elzevier Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 2.037