T von Lengerke1, B Lutze2, K Graf3, C Krauth4, K Lange2, L Schwadtke3, J Stahmeyer4, I F Chaberny3. 1. Medical Psychology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany. Electronic address: lengerke.thomas@mh-hannover.de. 2. Medical Psychology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany. 3. Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany. 4. Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research applying psychological behaviour change theories to hand hygiene compliance is scarce, especially for physicians. AIM: To identify psychosocial determinants of self-reported hand hygiene behaviour (HHB) of physicians and nurses in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire that applied concepts from the Health Action Process Approach on hygienic hand disinfection was conducted in 10 ICUs and two haematopoietic stem cell transplantation units at Hannover Medical School, Germany. Self-reported compliance was operationalized as always disinfecting one's hands when given tasks associated with risk of infection. Using seven-point Likert scales, behavioural planning, maintenance self-efficacy and action control were assessed as psychological factors, and personnel and material resources, organizational problems and cooperation on the ward were assessed as perceived environmental factors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed. FINDINGS: In total, 307 physicians and 348 nurses participated in this study (response rates 70.9% and 63.4%, respectively). Self-reported compliance did not differ between the groups (72.4% vs 69.4%, P = 0.405). While nurses reported stronger planning, self-efficacy and action control, physicians indicated better personnel resources and cooperation on the ward (P < 0.02). Self-efficacy [odds ratio (OR) 1.4, P = 0.041], action control (OR 1.8, P < 0.001) and cooperation on the ward (OR 1.5, P = 0.036) were positively associated with HHB among physicians, but only action control was positively associated with HHB among nurses (OR 1.6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The associations between action control (self-regulatory strategies where behaviour is evaluated continuously and automatically against guidelines) and compliance indicate that HHB is a habit in need of self-monitoring. The fact that perceived cooperation on the ward was the only environmental correlate of HHB among physicians stresses the importance of team-directed interventions.
BACKGROUND: Research applying psychological behaviour change theories to hand hygiene compliance is scarce, especially for physicians. AIM: To identify psychosocial determinants of self-reported hand hygiene behaviour (HHB) of physicians and nurses in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire that applied concepts from the Health Action Process Approach on hygienic hand disinfection was conducted in 10 ICUs and two haematopoietic stem cell transplantation units at Hannover Medical School, Germany. Self-reported compliance was operationalized as always disinfecting one's hands when given tasks associated with risk of infection. Using seven-point Likert scales, behavioural planning, maintenance self-efficacy and action control were assessed as psychological factors, and personnel and material resources, organizational problems and cooperation on the ward were assessed as perceived environmental factors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed. FINDINGS: In total, 307 physicians and 348 nurses participated in this study (response rates 70.9% and 63.4%, respectively). Self-reported compliance did not differ between the groups (72.4% vs 69.4%, P = 0.405). While nurses reported stronger planning, self-efficacy and action control, physicians indicated better personnel resources and cooperation on the ward (P < 0.02). Self-efficacy [odds ratio (OR) 1.4, P = 0.041], action control (OR 1.8, P < 0.001) and cooperation on the ward (OR 1.5, P = 0.036) were positively associated with HHB among physicians, but only action control was positively associated with HHB among nurses (OR 1.6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The associations between action control (self-regulatory strategies where behaviour is evaluated continuously and automatically against guidelines) and compliance indicate that HHB is a habit in need of self-monitoring. The fact that perceived cooperation on the ward was the only environmental correlate of HHB among physicians stresses the importance of team-directed interventions.
Authors: Thomas von Lengerke; Bettina Lutze; Christian Krauth; Karin Lange; Jona Theodor Stahmeyer; Iris Freya Chaberny Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Thomas von Lengerke; Ella Ebadi; Bettina Schock; Christian Krauth; Karin Lange; Jona T Stahmeyer; Iris F Chaberny Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Vicki Erasmus; Suzie Otto; Emmely De Roos; Rianne van Eijsden; Margreet C Vos; Alex Burdorf; Ed van Beeck Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ivonne Tomsic; Ella Ebadi; Frank Gossé; Ina Hartlep; Pamela Schipper; Christian Krauth; Bettina Schock; Iris F Chaberny; Thomas von Lengerke Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Milena Trifunovic-Koenig; Stefan Bushuven; Bianka Gerber; Baerbel Otto; Markus Dettenkofer; Florian Salm; Martin R Fischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 3.390