Literature DB >> 26184520

Analysis of circulating DNA and protein biomarkers to predict the clinical activity of regorafenib and assess prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the CORRECT trial.

Josep Tabernero1, Heinz-Josef Lenz2, Salvatore Siena3, Alberto Sobrero4, Alfredo Falcone5, Marc Ychou6, Yves Humblet7, Olivier Bouché8, Laurent Mineur9, Carlo Barone10, Antoine Adenis11, Takayuki Yoshino12, Richard M Goldberg13, Daniel J Sargent14, Andrea Wagner15, Dirk Laurent15, Michael Teufel16, Michael Jeffers16, Axel Grothey14, Eric Van Cutsem17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumour mutational status is an important determinant of the response of metastatic colorectal cancer to targeted treatments. However, the genotype of the tissue obtained at the time of diagnosis might not accurately represent tumour genotype after multiple lines of treatment. This retrospective exploratory analysis investigated the clinical activity of regorafenib in biomarker subgroups of the CORRECT study population defined by tumour mutational status or plasma protein levels.
METHODS: We used BEAMing technology to identify KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations in DNA obtained from the plasma of 503 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who enrolled in the CORRECT trial. We quantified total human genomic DNA isolated from plasma samples for 503 patients using a modified version of human long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) quantitive real-time PCR. We also measured the concentration of 15 proteins of interest-angiopoietin 2, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, placental growth factor, soluble TIE-1, soluble VEGFR1, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-A isoform 121, bone morphogenetic protein 7, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, stromal cell-derived factor-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2, and von Willebrand factor-in plasma samples from 611 patients. We did correlative analyses of overall survival and progression-free survival in patient subgroups based on mutational status, circulating DNA concentration, and protein concentrations. The CORRECT trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01103323.
FINDINGS: Tumour-associated mutations were readily detected with BEAMing of plasma DNA, with KRAS mutations identified in 349 (69%) of 503 patients, PIK3CA mutations in 84 (17%) of 503 patients, and BRAF mutations in 17 (3%) of 502 patients. We did not do correlative analysis based on BRAF genotype because of the low mutational frequency detected for this gene. Some of the most prevalent individual hot-spot mutations we identified included: KRAS (KRAS G12D, 116 [28%] of 413 mutations; G12V, 72 [17%]; and G13D, 67 [16%]) and PIK3CA (PIK3CA E542K, 27 [30%] of 89 mutations; E545K, 37 [42%]; and H1047R, 12 [14%]). 41 (48%) of 86 patients who had received anti-EGFR therapy and whose archival tumour tissue DNA was KRAS wild-type in BEAMing analysis were identified as having KRAS mutations in BEAMing analysis of fresh plasma DNA. Correlative analyses suggest a clinical benefit favouring regorafenib across patient subgroups defined by KRAS and PIK3CA mutational status (progression-free survival with regorafenib vs placebo: hazard ratio [HR] 0·52, 95% CI 0·35-0·76 for KRAS wild-type; HR 0·51, 95% CI 0·40-0·65 for KRAS mutant [KRAS wild type vs mutant, pinteraction=0·74]; HR 0·50, 95% CI 0·40-0·63 for PIK3CA wild-type; HR 0·54, 95% CI 0·32-0·89 for PIK3CA mutant [PIK3CA wild-type vs mutant, pinteraction=0·85]) or circulating DNA concentration (progression-free survival with regorafenib vs placebo: HR 0·53, 95% CI 0·40-0·71, for low circulating DNA concentrations; HR 0·52, 95% CI 0·40-0·70, for high circulating DNA concentrations; low vs high circulating DNA, pinteraction=0·601). With the exception of von Willebrand factor, assessed with the median cutoff method, plasma protein concentrations were also not associated with regorafenib activity in terms of progression-free survival. In univariable analyses, the only plasma protein that was associated with overall survival was TIE-1, high concentrations of which were associated with longer overall survival compared with low TIE-1 concentrations. This association was not significant in multivariable analyses.
INTERPRETATION: BEAMing of circulating DNA could be a viable approach for non-invasive analysis of tumour genotype in real time and for the identification of potentially clinically relevant mutations that are not detected in archival tissue. Additionally, the results show that regorafenib seems to be consistently associated with a clinical benefit in a range of patient subgroups based on mutational status and protein biomarker concentrations. FUNDING: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26184520      PMCID: PMC7513622          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00138-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  47 in total

1.  Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Peeters; Timothy Jay Price; Andrés Cervantes; Alberto F Sobrero; Michel Ducreux; Yevhen Hotko; Thierry André; Emily Chan; Florian Lordick; Cornelis J A Punt; Andrew H Strickland; Gregory Wilson; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Laslo Roman; Eric Van Cutsem; Valentina Tzekova; Simon Collins; Kelly S Oliner; Alan Rong; Jennifer Gansert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial.

Authors:  Fairooz F Kabbinavar; Joseph Schulz; Michael McCleod; Taral Patel; John T Hamm; J Randolph Hecht; Robert Mass; Brent Perrou; Betty Nelson; William F Novotny
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The clinical value of von Willebrand factor in colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Vera S Schellerer; Larissa Mueller-Bergh; Susanne Merkel; Robert Zimmermann; Dominik Weiss; Anne Schlabrakowski; Elisabeth Naschberger; Michael Stürzl; Werner Hohenberger; Roland S Croner
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Predictive and prognostic markers in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): personalized medicine at work.

Authors:  Sebastian Stintzing; Stefan Stremitzer; Ana Sebio; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.722

5.  The receptor tyrosine kinase Tie1 is expressed and activated in epithelial tumour cell lines.

Authors:  Kathryn A Rees; Harprit Singh; Nicholas P J Brindle
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; Erika Hitre; Jerzy Zaluski; Chung-Rong Chang Chien; Anatoly Makhson; Geert D'Haens; Tamás Pintér; Robert Lim; György Bodoky; Jae Kyung Roh; Gunnar Folprecht; Paul Ruff; Christopher Stroh; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Johannes Nippgen; Philippe Rougier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Regorafenib for patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable renal-cell carcinoma: a single-group phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Tim Eisen; Heikki Joensuu; Paul D Nathan; Peter G Harper; Marek Z Wojtukiewicz; Steve Nicholson; Amit Bahl; Piotr Tomczak; Seppo Pyrhonen; Kate Fife; Petri Bono; Jane Boxall; Andrea Wagner; Michael Jeffers; Tiffany Lin; David I Quinn
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Luis A Diaz; Richard T Williams; Jian Wu; Isaac Kinde; J Randolph Hecht; Jordan Berlin; Benjamin Allen; Ivana Bozic; Johannes G Reiter; Martin A Nowak; Kenneth W Kinzler; Kelly S Oliner; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer.

Authors:  Simon A Forbes; Nidhi Bindal; Sally Bamford; Charlotte Cole; Chai Yin Kok; David Beare; Mingming Jia; Rebecca Shepherd; Kenric Leung; Andrew Menzies; Jon W Teague; Peter J Campbell; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth.

Authors:  Andrea Sottoriva; Haeyoun Kang; Zhicheng Ma; Trevor A Graham; Matthew P Salomon; Junsong Zhao; Paul Marjoram; Kimberly Siegmund; Michael F Press; Darryl Shibata; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  114 in total

Review 1.  Cell-Free DNA in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karen-Lise G Spindler; Anders K Boysen; Niels Pallisgård; Julia S Johansen; Josep Tabernero; Morten M Sørensen; Benny V Jensen; Torben F Hansen; David Sefrioui; Rikke F Andersen; Ivan Brandslund; Anders Jakobsen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Circulating tumor DNA: a resuscitative gold mine?

Authors:  Zhaohui Huang; Bing Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

3.  Comment on: "Regorafenib: Start Low and Go Slow".

Authors:  Christelle de la Fouchardière
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.493

4.  Colorectal and gastric cancer in 2015: The development of new agents and molecular classifications.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Clinical Utility of Analyzing Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nakamura; Takayuki Yoshino
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-26

6.  Regorafenib in the Real-Life Clinical Practice: Data from the Czech Registry.

Authors:  Katerina Kopeckova; Tomas Buchler; Zbynek Bortlicek; Karel Hejduk; Renata Chloupkova; Bohuslav Melichar; Petra Pokorna; Jiri Tomasek; Zdenek Linke; Lubos Petruzelka; Igor Kiss; Jana Prausova
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 7.  Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in personalized gastrointestinal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Helena Verdaguer; Tamara Saurí; Teresa Macarulla
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

8.  Regorafenib in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smyth
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 9.  The Role of BEAMing and Digital PCR for Multiplexed Analysis in Molecular Oncology in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Jérôme Alexandre Denis; Erell Guillerm; Florence Coulet; Annette K Larsen; Jean-Marc Lacorte
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 10.  Antiangiogenic therapy for refractory colorectal cancer: current options and future strategies.

Authors:  Rachel Riechelmann; Axel Grothey
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 8.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.