| Literature DB >> 26184407 |
Acacio Aparecido Navarrete1, Tielle Soares, Raffaella Rossetto, Johannes Antonie van Veen, Siu Mui Tsai, Eiko Eurya Kuramae.
Abstract
Here we show that verrucomicrobial community structure and abundance are extremely sensitive to changes in chemical factors linked to soil fertility. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism fingerprint and real-time quantitative PCR assay were used to analyze changes in verrucomicrobial communities associated with contrasting soil nutrient conditions in tropical regions. In case study Model I ("Slash-and-burn deforestation") the verrucomicrobial community structures revealed disparate patterns in nutrient-enriched soils after slash-and-burn deforestation and natural nutrient-poor soils under an adjacent primary forest in the Amazonia (R = 0.819, P = 0.002). The relative proportion of Verrucomicrobia declined in response to increased soil fertility after slash-and-burn deforestation, accounting on average, for 4 and 2 % of the total bacterial signal, in natural nutrient-poor forest soils and nutrient-enriched deforested soils, respectively. In case study Model II ("Management practices for sugarcane") disparate patterns were revealed in sugarcane rhizosphere sampled on optimal and deficient soil fertility for sugarcane (R = 0.786, P = 0.002). Verrucomicrobial community abundance in sugarcane rhizosphere was negatively correlated with soil fertility, accounting for 2 and 5 % of the total bacterial signal, under optimal and deficient soil fertility conditions for sugarcane, respectively. In nutrient-enriched soils, verrucomicrobial community structures were related to soil factors linked to soil fertility, such as total nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sum of bases, i.e., the sum of calcium, magnesium and potassium contents. We conclude that community structure and abundance represent important ecological aspects in soil verrucomicrobial communities for tracking the changes in chemical factors linked to soil fertility under tropical environmental conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26184407 PMCID: PMC4525199 DOI: 10.1007/s10482-015-0530-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek ISSN: 0003-6072 Impact factor: 2.271
Fig. 1Principal component analysis plot based on the structure of soil verrucomicrobial communities as determined by T-RFLP analysis in nutrient-enriched soils after slash-and-burn forest clearing and natural nutrient-poor soils in an adjacent primary forest in three discontinuous areas after forest clearing and burning. Symbols refer to individual replicates (A, B, C, D and E) of the following sampling sites: open squares forest site located at Area 1 (FS1), open diamonds forest site located at Area 2 (FS2), open circle forest site located at Area 3 (FS3), black squares deforested site located at Area 1 (DS1), black diamonds deforested site located at Area 2 (DS2), black circle deforested site located at Area 3 (DS3)
Fig. 2Constrained ordination diagram for sample plots (deforested and forest soil samples) in the first two redundancy analysis (RDA) axes based on the soil chemical characteristics of the different sampling sites and their relationship with the verrucomicrobial T-RFLP generated by restriction with enzymes AluI, MspI and HhaI. Symbols refer to individual replicates (A, B, C, D and E) of the following sampling sites: open squares forest site located at Area 1 (FS1), open diamonds forest site located at Area 2 (FS2), open circle forest site located at Area 3 (FS3), black squares deforested site located at Area 1 (DS1), black diamonds deforested site located at Area 2 (DS2), black circle deforested site located at Area 3 (DS3)
Abundance of soil total bacteria and verrucomicrobial communities based on quantitative real-time PCR measurements in three discontinuous areas in the southeastern Brazilian Amazon in forested (FS) and deforested (DS) sites
| Area 1 | Area 2 | Area 3 | Statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FS | DS | FS | DS | FS | DS | FS versus DS | |
| Absolute abundance (107 16S rDNA copies g soil) | |||||||
| Total bacteria | 14.2aab
| 11.9a | 13.3a | 11.3a | 18.0a | 15.7a | nsd |
| | 0.56a | 0.32b | 0.61a | 0.29b | 0.76a | 0.30b | ** |
| Relative abundance (%) | |||||||
| | 3.9a | 2.7b | 4.6a | 2.6b | 4.2a | 1.9b | ** |
FS Soil from forest site, DS soil from deforested site. 1, 2 and 3 indicate three discontinuous sampling areas
aAverage for each of five replicates soil
bValues with the same letters were not significantly different (P < 0.05)—within the same line—based on upon a Tukey’s HSD test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Tukey’s test was performed contrasting FS versus DS within each area for each soil chemical factor across five soil cores for FS and five soil cores for DS
cStandard deviation of the average for each of five replicates soil
dTukey’s HSD test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was performed considering FS versus DS regarding to all sampling sites across 15 soil cores for FS and 15 soil cores for DS. Significance levels: ns P > 0.05; ** P < 0.005
Fig. 3Principal component analysis-plot based on the structure of verrucomicrobial communities as determined by T-RFLP analysis in sugarcane rhizosphere soil collected from plants grown in a greenhouse mesocosm experiment and sampled on optimal and deficient root-free soil fertility for sugarcane
Fig. 4Constrained ordination diagram for sample plots (sugarcane rhizosphere soil samples collected on optimal and deficient soil fertility for sugarcane) in the first two redundancy analysis (RDA) axes based on the soil chemical characteristics of the different soil treatments and their relationship with the verrucomicrobial T-RFLP data from restriction profiles generated by enzymes AluI, MspI and HhaI
Abundance of total bacteria and verrucomicrobial communities in soil based on quantitative real-time PCR measurements in sugarcane rhizosphere grown in a greenhouse mesocosm experiment and collected at optimal and deficient soil fertility for sugarcane
| Sugarcane rhizosphere on optimal soil fertility for sugarcane | Sugarcane rhizosphere on deficient soil fertility for sugarcane | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | N + S | N + V | N + V + S | C | C + S | N | N + S | N + V | N + V + S | C | C + S | |
| Absolute abundance (107 16S rDNA copies g soil) | ||||||||||||
| Total bacteria | 12.2aab
| 12.9a | 13.5a | 14.1a | 12.3a | 12.7a | 13.6a | 13.8a | 14.7a | 14.9a | 12.4a | 12.9a |
| | 0.28a | 0.33a | 0.27a | 0.29a | 0.23a | 0.25a | 0.65b | 0.74b | 0.66b | 0.74b | 0.57b | 0.63b |
| Relative abundance (%) | ||||||||||||
| | 2.3a | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 4.8b | 5.4 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 4.9 |
Experimental treatments: N, nitrogen fertilizer; N + S, N fertilizer and straw blanket; N + V, N and vinasse as fertilizers; N + V + S, N and V as fertilizers and straw blanket; C, excluding any N, V fertilizer and straw blanket (control); and C + S, excluding any N and V fertilizer and including straw blanket
aAverage for each of six replicates sugarcane rhizosphere soil
bValues with the same letters were not significantly different (P < 0.05)—within the same line—based on upon a Tukey’s HSD test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Tukey’s HSD test was performed contrasting optimal versus deficient soil fertility conditions for surgarcane within each experimental treatment
cStandard deviation of the average for each of six replicates soil