| Literature DB >> 26184267 |
Abstract
Environmental processes and biological community structures change along fluvial gradients within coastal river basins; the accumulation and associated risk of metal contamination would also be expected to change from upstream to downstream reaches. Speciation and degrees of contamination of metals in sediments from the upstream and downstream of river catchments of the southern Bohai Sea were investigated. The mean concentrations of Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Cd and Pb from upstream reaches were 82.6, 157, 63.6, 26.6, 0.18 and 24.9 mg/kg, respectively. The mean concentrations of Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Cd and Pb from downstream reaches were 38.0, 66.0, 38.9, 18.1, 0.16 and 24.0 mg/kg, respectively. Most of the Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni and Pb in sediments from both the upstream and downstream reaches was mainly associated with the residual fraction. However, Cd was preferentially bound to the exchangeable phase. A cluster analysis was used to study the degree of association between sites, and three distinct clusters were identified in both upstream and downstream sediments. A correlation analysis was conducted to determine the extent of association among metals and showed that metals in sediments from the upstream reaches have more affinity than those in the downstream area. Sediment quality guidelines were used to evaluate potential risks. The risks from Zn, Cr and Ni in the upstream reaches were higher than those from downstream reaches; however, the other three metals (Cu, Pb and Cd) showed opposite results.Entities:
Keywords: Community Bureau of Reference (BCR); cluster analysis; correlation analysis; salinity; sediment quality guidelines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26184267 PMCID: PMC4515703 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120707959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Sampling sites along the watershed of the Bohai Sea (upstream sampling sites are labeled U1 to U25, and downstream sites are labeled D1 to D15).
Metal concentrations in sediments from the upstream and downstream reaches.
| Area | Cu | Zn | Cr | Ni | Cd | Pb | pH | TOC | Clay (%) | Silt (%) | Sand (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream | Max | 1.46 × 103 | 1.60 × 103 | 196 | 67.2 | 1.41 | 63.5 | 9.16 | 3.10 | 45.3 | 74.1 | 32.5 |
| Min | 1.27 | 8.10 | 0.45 | 1.92 | 0.07 | 17.9 | 6.49 | 0.15 | 8.70 | 54.0 | 0.69 | |
| Median | 20.8 | 57.9 | 47.4 | 23.3 | 0.14 | 22.4 | 7.80 | 0.98 | 29.3 | 66.5 | 2.36 | |
| Mean | 82.6 | 157 | 63.6 | 26.6 | 0.18 | 24.9 | 7.77 | 1.29 | 28.7 | 66.3 | 4.96 | |
| SD | 289 | 321 | 484 | 131 | 0.26 | 8.79 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 8.77 | 5.47 | 6.91 | |
| Skew | 4.94 | 4.15 | 1.11 | 1.02 | 4.84 | 3.80 | 0.16 | 0.80 | −0.37 | −0.61 | 3.08 | |
| Kurtosis | 24.6 | 18.6 | 0.94 | 2.96 | 23.9 | 16.7 | 0.59 | −0.24 | 0.26 | −0.40 | 10.6 | |
| Downstream | Max | 345 | 361 | 100 | 37.2 | 0.68 | 36.7 | 6.96 | 1.38 | 37.6 | 74.1 | 20.1 |
| Min | 0.22 | 11.8 | 1.38 | 3.36 | 0.06 | 16.8 | 8.56 | 0.23 | 13.8 | 60.7 | 0.96 | |
| Median | 16.9 | 44.0 | 38.2 | 16.2 | 0.14 | 22.6 | 7.83 | 0.76 | 25.9 | 68.0 | 4.84 | |
| Mean | 38.0 | 66.0 | 38.9 | 18.1 | 0.16 | 24.0 | 7.84 | 0.77 | 25.5 | 67.6 | 6.92 | |
| SD | 86.1 | 83.1 | 26.4 | 10.1 | 0.15 | 5.65 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 6.70 | 3.82 | 6.28 | |
| Skew | 3.71 | 3.63 | 0.67 | 0.29 | 3.55 | 1.25 | −0.32 | 0.19 | 0.01 | −0.17 | 1.17 | |
| Kurtosis | 14.1 | 13.7 | 0.68 | −0.79 | 13.3 | 1.30 | −0.10 | 0.32 | −0.28 | −0.64 | 0.13 | |
| UCC a | 25.0 | 71.0 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 0.10 | 20.0 | ||||||
a Average concentrations of the Upper Continental Crust [19].
Figure 2Partitioning of metals in the sediments. (a) Downstream; (b) upstream.
Classification of sediment samples based on the proposed sediment quality guidelines (SQGs). TEL, threshold effect level; PEL, probable effects level.
| Metal | SQGs (mg/kg)-Freshwater Sediment (Upstream) | Percentage of Samples Exceeding SQGs (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEL | PEL | <TEL | TEL-PEL | >PEL | |
| Cu | 35.7 | 197 | 80.0 | 16.0 | 4.00 |
| Zn | 123 | 315 | 80.0 | 8.00 | 12.0 |
| Cr | 37.3 | 90.0 | 32.0 | 44.0 | 24.0 |
| Ni | 18.0 | 35.9 | 16.0 | 68.0 | 16.0 |
| Pb | 35.0 | 91.3 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 0.00 |
| Cd | 0.60 | 3.53 | 96.0 | 4.00 | 0.00 |
| Cu | 18.7 | 108 | 73.3 | 20.0 | 6.67 |
| Zn | 124 | 271 | 93.3 | 0.00 | 6.67 |
| Cr | 52.3 | 160 | 73.3 | 26.7 | 0.00 |
| Ni | 15.9 | 42.8 | 46.7 | 53.3 | 0.00 |
| Pb | 30.2 | 112 | 86.7 | 13.3 | 0.00 |
| Cd | 0.68 | 4.21 | 93.3 | 6.67 | 0.00 |
Figure 3Dendrogram of the cluster analysis of metal concentrations in the study area. (a) Upstream (U); (b) downstream (D).
Correlation analysis of metals among all sampling sites.
| Area | Cu | Zn | Cr | Ni | Cd | Pb | TOC | pH | Clay (%) | Silt (%) | Sand (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream | Cu | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| Zn | 0.96 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| Cr | 0.34 | 0.51 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| Ni | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| Cd | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Pb | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.53 | 0.23 | 0.94 | 1.00 | ||||||
| TOC | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 1.00 | |||||
| pH | −0.49 | −0.57 | −0.46 | −0.29 | −0.48 | −0.50 | −0.55 | 1.00 | ||||
| Clay (%) | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.77 | 0.22 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.62 | −0.51 | 1.00 | |||
| Silt (%) | −0.51 | −0.61 | −0.67 | −0.22 | −0.50 | −0.60 | −0.58 | 0.69 | −0.62 | 1.00 | ||
| Sand (%) | −0.16 | −0.22 | −0.45 | −0.11 | −0.20 | −0.20 | −0.33 | 0.10 | −0.78 | −0.01 | 1.00 | |
| Downstream | Cu | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| Zn | 0.98 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| Cr | 0.11 | 0.15 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| Ni | −0.01 | 0.10 | 0.48 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| Cd | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Pb | 0.61 | 0.66 | −0.10 | 0.23 | 0.65 | 1.00 | ||||||
| TOC | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 1.00 | |||||
| pH | −0.59 | −0.54 | −0.08 | 0.37 | −0.54 | −0.15 | 0.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Clay (%) | −0.06 | 0.10 | 0.46 | 0.35 | 0.03 | 0.80 | −0.07 | −0.17 | 1.00 | |||
| Silt (%) | 0.24 | 0.24 | −0.09 | −0.26 | 0.29 | −0.06 | −0.13 | −0.20 | −0.40 | 1.00 | ||
| Sand (%) | −0.08 | −0.16 | −0.44 | −0.21 | −0.20 | −0.05 | 0.15 | 0.30 | −0.83 | −0.20 | 1.00 | |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); * correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).