Literature DB >> 26183962

Patient-Specific Surgical Planning, Where Do We Stand? The Example of the Fontan Procedure.

Diane A de Zélicourt1, Vartan Kurtcuoglu2,3,4.   

Abstract

The Fontan surgery for single ventricle heart defects is a typical example of a clinical intervention in which patient-specific computational modeling can improve patient outcome: with the functional heterogeneity of the presenting patients, which precludes generic solutions, and the clear influence of the surgically-created Fontan connection on hemodynamics, it is acknowledged that individualized computational optimization of the post-operative hemodynamics can be of clinical value. A large body of literature has thus emerged seeking to provide clinically relevant answers and innovative solutions, with an increasing emphasis on patient-specific approaches. In this review we discuss the benefits and challenges of patient-specific simulations for the Fontan surgery, reviewing state of the art solutions and avenues for future development. We first discuss the clinical impact of patient-specific simulations, notably how they have contributed to our understanding of the link between Fontan hemodynamics and patient outcome. This is followed by a survey of methodologies for capturing patient-specific hemodynamics, with an emphasis on the challenges of defining patient-specific boundary conditions and their extension for prediction of post-operative outcome. We conclude with insights into potential future directions, noting that one of the most pressing issues might be the validation of the predictive capabilities of the developed framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boundary conditions; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Multi-scale; Numerical simulations; Review; Single ventricle heart defects; Total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26183962     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1381-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  14 in total

1.  Virtual surgical planning, flow simulation, and 3-dimensional electrospinning of patient-specific grafts to optimize Fontan hemodynamics.

Authors:  Dominik Siallagan; Yue-Hin Loke; Laura Olivieri; Justin Opfermann; Chin Siang Ong; Diane de Zélicourt; Anastasios Petrou; Marianne Schmid Daners; Vartan Kurtcuoglu; Mirko Meboldt; Kevin Nelson; Luca Vricella; Jed Johnson; Narutoshi Hibino; Axel Krieger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Can time-averaged flow boundary conditions be used to meet the clinical timeline for Fontan surgical planning?

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Mike Tree; Christopher M Haggerty; Elaine Tang; Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The effect of respiration-driven flow waveforms on hemodynamic metrics used in Fontan surgical planning.

Authors:  Elaine Tang; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Phillip M Trusty; Kevin K Whitehead; Lucia Mirabella; Alessandro Veneziani; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Role of surgeon intuition and computer-aided design in Fontan optimization: A computational fluid dynamics simulation study.

Authors:  Yue-Hin Loke; Byeol Kim; Paige Mass; Justin D Opfermann; Narutoshi Hibino; Axel Krieger; Laura Olivieri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Guillermo Lorenzo; David A Hormuth; Ernesto A B F Lima; Kalina P Slavkova; Julie C DiCarlo; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Debra Patt; Caroline Chung; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 6.  Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation?

Authors:  Giovanni Biglino; Claudio Capelli; Jan Bruse; Giorgia M Bosi; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Predictive Models for Pulmonary Artery Size in Fontan Patients.

Authors:  Akash Gupta; Chris Gillett; Patrick Gerard; Michael M H Cheung; Jonathan P Mynard; Ethan Kung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.495

9.  Is Doppler Echocardiography Adequate for Surgical Planning of Single Ventricle Patients?

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Biao Si; Xiaoqian Ge; Meng Zhu; Maria A Cetatoiu; Chenze Tian; Lixin Sun; Bin Qiao
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.495

10.  A Versatile Hybrid Mock Circulation for Hydraulic Investigations of Active and Passive Cardiovascular Implants.

Authors:  Anastasios Petrou; Marcus Granegger; Mirko Meboldt; Marianne Schmid Daners
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.