Literature DB >> 26183146

Impact of interpregnancy interval on the subsequent risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Atalay Ekin1, Cenk Gezer1, Cuneyt Eftal Taner1, Mehmet Ozeren1, Emre Mat1, Ulas Solmaz1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of interpregnancy interval as a risk factor on multiple adverse perinatal outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Interpregnancy intervals and confounding factors were determined for healthy pregnancies (controls [n = 357]) and for pregnancies complicated by adverse perinatal outcomes. Interpregnancy interval was categorized as <6, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23, 24-35 and ≥36 months. Adverse outcomes included spontaneous labor leading to preterm birth (n = 265), preterm premature rupture of membranes (n = 245), pre-eclampsia (n = 286), gestational diabetes (n = 302), abnormal placentation (n = 154), anemia (n = 314), congenital anomalies (n = 459), post-partum hemorrhage (n = 326) and small for gestational age (n = 168). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of each outcome with the interpregnancy interval categories.
RESULTS: Spontaneous labor leading to preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.97), preterm premature rupture of membranes (OR, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.28-2.39), congenital anomalies (OR, 1.38; 95%CI, 1.09-1.76) and small for gestational age (OR, 1.68; 95%CI, 1.14-2.34) were significantly associated with intervals of <6 months. Among congenital anomalies, short interpregnancy interval represents an increased risk for cardiac defects (OR, 1.55; 95%CI, 1.09-5.46), neural tube defects (OR, 2.06; 95%CI, 1.32-7.64) and central nervous system anomalies (OR, 1.45; 95%CI, 1.12-3.65).
CONCLUSION: Short interpregnancy interval is an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes.
© 2015 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital anomaly; interpregnancy interval; preterm premature rupture of membranes; small for gestational age; spontaneous preterm birth

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26183146     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  11 in total

1.  Association of Interpregnancy Interval With Adverse Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Huazhang Miao; Yuliang Chen; Limei Luo; Pi Guo; Yingxian Zhu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  A Population-Based Matched-Sibling Analysis Estimating the Associations Between First Interpregnancy Interval and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Annette K Regan; Stephen J Ball; Joshua L Warren; Eva Malacova; Amy Padula; Cicely Marston; Natasha Nassar; Fiona Stanley; Helen Leonard; Nicholas de Klerk; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Short interpregnancy intervals and risks for birth defects: support for the nutritional depletion hypothesis.

Authors:  Julie M Petersen; Mahsa M Yazdy; Kelly D Getz; Marlene T Anderka; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Recurrence of premature rupture of membranes among pregnancies admitted to a Tertiary Hospital: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Deniz Suzme; Sinan Ates; Cem Yener; G Fusun Varol
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Analysis of Contraceptive Use Among Immigrant Women Following Expansion of Medicaid Coverage for Postpartum Care.

Authors:  Maria I Rodriguez; Megan Skye; Stephan Lindner; Aaron B Caughey; Ana Lopez-DeFede; Blair G Darney; K John McConnell
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Postpartum contraceptive practices among urban and peri-urban women in North India: a mixed-methods cohort study protocol.

Authors:  Nivedita Roy; Priyanka Adhikary; Rita Kabra; James Kiarie; Gitau Mburu; Neeta Dhabhai; Ranadip Chowdhury; Sarmila Mazumder
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Effect of short inter-pregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes among pregnant women in North-west Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Leta Gurmu; Negash Wakgari; Tufa Kolola; Kababa Temesgen Danusa
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-08

8.  Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: An international cohort study.

Authors:  Gizachew A Tessema; M Luke Marinovich; Siri E Håberg; Mika Gissler; Jonathan A Mayo; Natasha Nassar; Stephen Ball; Ana Pilar Betrán; Amanuel T Gebremedhin; Nick de Klerk; Maria C Magnus; Cicely Marston; Annette K Regan; Gary M Shaw; Amy M Padula; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Role of Extremes in Interpregnancy Interval in Women at Increased Risk for Adverse Obstetric Outcomes Due to Health Disparities: 
A Literature Review.

Authors:  Andrew S Thagard; Peter G Napolitano; Allison S Bryant
Journal:  Curr Womens Health Rev       Date:  2018-10

10.  Impact of integrating a postpartum family planning program into a community-based maternal and newborn health program on birth spacing and preterm birth in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Abdullah H Baqui; Salahuddin Ahmed; Nazma Begum; Rasheda Khanam; Diwakar Mohan; Meagan Harrison; Ahmed Al Kabir; Catharine McKaig; Neal Brandes; Maureen Norton; Saifuddin Ahmed
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.