Sarah J Chittenden1, Cecilia Hindorf2, Christopher C Parker3, Valerie J Lewington4, Brenda E Pratt5, Bernadette Johnson3, Glenn D Flux5. 1. Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom sarah.chittenden@icr.ac.uk. 2. Department of Radiation Physics, Radionuklidcentralen, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden. 3. Department of Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom; and. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 5. Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The aim of this single-site, open-label clinical trial was to determine the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, absorbed doses, and safety from 2 sequential weight-based administrations of (223)Ra-dichloride in patients with bone metastases due to castration-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: Six patients received 2 intravenous injections of (223)Ra-dichloride, 6 wk apart, at 100 kBq/kg of whole-body weight. The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution as a function of time were determined, and dosimetry was performed for a range of organs including bone surfaces, red marrow, kidneys, gut, and whole body using scintigraphic imaging; external counting; and blood, fecal, and urine collection. Safety was assessed from adverse events. RESULTS: The injected activity cleared rapidly from blood, with 1.1% remaining at 24 h. The main route of excretion was via the gut, although no significant toxicity was reported. Most of the administered activity was taken up rapidly into bone (61% at 4 h). The range of absorbed doses delivered to the bone surfaces from α emissions was 2,331-13,118 mGy/MBq. The ranges of absorbed doses delivered to the red marrow were 177-994 and 1-5 mGy/MBq from activity on the bone surfaces and from activity in the blood, respectively. No activity-limiting toxicity was observed at these levels of administration. The absorbed doses from the second treatment were correlated significantly with the first for a combination of the whole body, bone surfaces, kidneys, and liver. CONCLUSION: A wide range of interpatient absorbed doses was delivered to normal organs. Intrapatient absorbed doses were significantly correlated between the 2 administrations for any given patient. The lack of gastrointestinal toxicity is likely due to the low absorbed doses delivered to the gut wall from the gut contents. The lack of adverse myelotoxicity implies that the absorbed dose delivered from the circulating activity may be a more relevant guide to the potential for marrow toxicity than that due to activity on the bone surfaces.
UNLABELLED: The aim of this single-site, open-label clinical trial was to determine the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, absorbed doses, and safety from 2 sequential weight-based administrations of (223)Ra-dichloride in patients with bone metastases due to castration-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: Six patients received 2 intravenous injections of (223)Ra-dichloride, 6 wk apart, at 100 kBq/kg of whole-body weight. The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution as a function of time were determined, and dosimetry was performed for a range of organs including bone surfaces, red marrow, kidneys, gut, and whole body using scintigraphic imaging; external counting; and blood, fecal, and urine collection. Safety was assessed from adverse events. RESULTS: The injected activity cleared rapidly from blood, with 1.1% remaining at 24 h. The main route of excretion was via the gut, although no significant toxicity was reported. Most of the administered activity was taken up rapidly into bone (61% at 4 h). The range of absorbed doses delivered to the bone surfaces from α emissions was 2,331-13,118 mGy/MBq. The ranges of absorbed doses delivered to the red marrow were 177-994 and 1-5 mGy/MBq from activity on the bone surfaces and from activity in the blood, respectively. No activity-limiting toxicity was observed at these levels of administration. The absorbed doses from the second treatment were correlated significantly with the first for a combination of the whole body, bone surfaces, kidneys, and liver. CONCLUSION: A wide range of interpatient absorbed doses was delivered to normal organs. Intrapatient absorbed doses were significantly correlated between the 2 administrations for any given patient. The lack of gastrointestinal toxicity is likely due to the low absorbed doses delivered to the gut wall from the gut contents. The lack of adverse myelotoxicity implies that the absorbed dose delivered from the circulating activity may be a more relevant guide to the potential for marrow toxicity than that due to activity on the bone surfaces.
Authors: Iain Murray; Sarah J Chittenden; Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Cecilia Hindorf; Christopher C Parker; Sue Chua; Glenn D Flux Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Thorsten D Poeppel; Daria Handkiewicz-Junak; Michael Andreeff; Alexander Becherer; Andreas Bockisch; Eva Fricke; Lilli Geworski; Alexander Heinzel; Bernd J Krause; Thomas Krause; Markus Mitterhauser; Wilfried Sonnenschein; Lisa Bodei; Roberto C Delgado-Bolton; Michael Gabriel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Calvin N Leung; Brian S Canter; Didier Rajon; Tom A Bäck; J Christopher Fritton; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Steven P Rowe; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier; Markus Dietlein; Michael A Gorin; Michael R Zalutsky; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 10.057