Paul G Baverel1, Meena Jain2, Iwona Stelmach3, Dewei She4, Balaji Agoram1, Sara Sandbach5, Edward Piper2, Piotr Kuna6. 1. Clinical Pharmacology, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, MedImmune, Cambridge, UK. 2. Clinical Development, MedImmune, Cambridge, UK. 3. Department of Paediatrics and Allergy, Medical University of Łódź, Poland. 4. Biostatistics, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. 5. Clinical Operations, MedImmune, Cambridge, UK. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Łódź, Poland.
Abstract
AIMS: Tralokinumab, an investigational human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, potently and specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a central mediator of asthma. Tralokinumab has shown improvements in clinical endpoints in adults with uncontrolled asthma. The present study explored the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of a single tralokinumab dose, and utilized a population PK modelling and simulation approach to evaluate the optimal dosing strategy for adolescents. METHODS: Adolescent subjects with asthma, using daily controller medication, received a single subcutaneous dose of tralokinumab 300 mg. Safety, immunogenicity and PK data were collected during a 57-day follow-up. A population PK model was developed using data from the present study and prior studies in adults. Simulations were performed to evaluate dose adjustment requirements for adolescents. RESULTS: Twenty adolescents (12-17 years) were enrolled; all completed the study. No clinically relevant safety findings or antidrug antibodies were detected. PK parameters were similar to those observed in adults. PK modelling showed that body weight was a minor predictor of tralokinumab PK; after incorporating body weight into the PK model, a 15% (nonparametric 95% confidence interval 5%, 26%) lower clearance was found in adolescents compared with adults [173 (151, 209) vs. 204 (191, 229) ml day(-1)]. Simulations showed no therapeutically relevant differences in exposures between adolescent and adult populations, and similar PK profiles for weight-based (4 mg kg(-1)) and fixed (300 mg) fortnightly subcutaneous doses of tralokinumab. CONCLUSION: Single-dose administration of tralokinumab 300 mg in adolescents was well tolerated, with a PK profile similar to that in adults. Exposure predictions suggest that dose adjustment is not required for adolescents.
AIMS: Tralokinumab, an investigational human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, potently and specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a central mediator of asthma. Tralokinumab has shown improvements in clinical endpoints in adults with uncontrolled asthma. The present study explored the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of a single tralokinumab dose, and utilized a population PK modelling and simulation approach to evaluate the optimal dosing strategy for adolescents. METHODS: Adolescent subjects with asthma, using daily controller medication, received a single subcutaneous dose of tralokinumab 300 mg. Safety, immunogenicity and PK data were collected during a 57-day follow-up. A population PK model was developed using data from the present study and prior studies in adults. Simulations were performed to evaluate dose adjustment requirements for adolescents. RESULTS: Twenty adolescents (12-17 years) were enrolled; all completed the study. No clinically relevant safety findings or antidrug antibodies were detected. PK parameters were similar to those observed in adults. PK modelling showed that body weight was a minor predictor of tralokinumab PK; after incorporating body weight into the PK model, a 15% (nonparametric 95% confidence interval 5%, 26%) lower clearance was found in adolescents compared with adults [173 (151, 209) vs. 204 (191, 229) ml day(-1)]. Simulations showed no therapeutically relevant differences in exposures between adolescent and adult populations, and similar PK profiles for weight-based (4 mg kg(-1)) and fixed (300 mg) fortnightly subcutaneous doses of tralokinumab. CONCLUSION: Single-dose administration of tralokinumab 300 mg in adolescents was well tolerated, with a PK profile similar to that in adults. Exposure predictions suggest that dose adjustment is not required for adolescents.
Authors: Prescott G Woodruff; Barmak Modrek; David F Choy; Guiquan Jia; Alexander R Abbas; Almut Ellwanger; Laura L Koth; Joseph R Arron; John V Fahy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alex Poole; Cydney Urbanek; Celeste Eng; Jeoffrey Schageman; Sean Jacobson; Brian P O'Connor; Joshua M Galanter; Christopher R Gignoux; Lindsey A Roth; Rajesh Kumar; Sharon Lutz; Andrew H Liu; Tasha E Fingerlin; Robert A Setterquist; Esteban G Burchard; Jose Rodriguez-Santana; Max A Seibold Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-02-02 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Edward Piper; Christopher Brightling; Robert Niven; Chad Oh; Raffaella Faggioni; Kwai Poon; Dewei She; Chris Kell; Richard D May; Gregory P Geba; Nestor A Molfino Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Stanley J Szefler; Graham Roberts; Adalberto S Rubin; Stefan Zielen; Piotr Kuna; Oral Alpan; Judith Anzures-Cabrera; Qiang Chen; Cécile T J Holweg; Janusz Kaminski; Wendy S Putnam; John G Matthews; Nikhil Kamath Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 5.657
Authors: Kim A Papp; Boulos Haraoui; Deepali Kumar; John K Marshall; Robert Bissonnette; Alain Bitton; Brian Bressler; Melinda Gooderham; Vincent Ho; Shahin Jamal; Janet E Pope; A Hillary Steinhart; Donald C Vinh; John Wade Journal: J Cutan Med Surg Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 2.092
Authors: John Hood; Ignacio González-García; Nicholas White; Leeron Marshall; Vincent F S Dubois; Paolo Vicini; Paul G Baverel Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 6.321