OBJECTIVES: This study was to assess the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiographic protocol for dissection of the coronary artery (DCA) detection compared with coronary angiology (CAG). METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound was used as the gold standard for DCA diagnosis. Thirty-six DCA patients and 34 non-DCA (control) participants were retrospectively reviewed. The CAG and MDCT angiography images were separately reviewed by 4 independent observers, and a 5-point grading scale was used for DCA diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: The MDCT performed significantly better than that of CAG (AZ = 0.9943 ± 0.0034 vs AZ = 0.8411 ± 0.0274, respectively) for DCA detection. The sensitivity (98.6%), specificity (89.7%), and negative predictive value (98.4%) of MDCT for DCA were higher than those of CAG (77.8%, 79.4%, and 77.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector computed tomography angiography was a more sensitive and specific technique for the diagnosis of DCA compared with CAG.
OBJECTIVES: This study was to assess the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiographic protocol for dissection of the coronary artery (DCA) detection compared with coronary angiology (CAG). METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound was used as the gold standard for DCA diagnosis. Thirty-six DCApatients and 34 non-DCA (control) participants were retrospectively reviewed. The CAG and MDCT angiography images were separately reviewed by 4 independent observers, and a 5-point grading scale was used for DCA diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: The MDCT performed significantly better than that of CAG (AZ = 0.9943 ± 0.0034 vs AZ = 0.8411 ± 0.0274, respectively) for DCA detection. The sensitivity (98.6%), specificity (89.7%), and negative predictive value (98.4%) of MDCT for DCA were higher than those of CAG (77.8%, 79.4%, and 77.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector computed tomography angiography was a more sensitive and specific technique for the diagnosis of DCA compared with CAG.
Authors: Per Tornvall; E B Brolin; K Caidahl; K Cederlund; O Collste; M Daniel; C Ekenbäck; J Jensen; S Y-Hassan; L Henareh; C Hofman-Bang; P Lyngå; E Maret; N Sarkar; J Spaak; M Sundqvist; P Sörensson; M Ugander; S Agewall Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 2.298