Literature DB >> 26182183

Improving Patient Safety in Clinical Oncology: Applying Lessons From Normal Accident Theory.

Bhishamjit S Chera1, Lukasz Mazur1, Ian Buchanan2, Hong Jin Kim3, John Rockwell4, Matthew I Milowsky5, Lawrence B Marks1.   

Abstract

Concerns for patient safety persist in clinical oncology. Within several nonmedical areas (eg, aviation, nuclear power), concepts from Normal Accident Theory (NAT), a framework for analyzing failure potential within and between systems, have been successfully applied to better understand system performance and improve system safety. Clinical oncology practice is interprofessional and interdisciplinary, and our therapies often have narrow therapeutic windows. Thus, many of our processes are, in NAT terms, interactively complex and tightly coupled within and across systems and are therefore prone to unexpected behaviors that can result in substantial patient harm. To improve safety at the University of North Carolina, we have applied the concepts of NAT to our practice to better understand our systems' behavior and adopted strategies to reduce complexity and coupling. Furthermore, recognizing that we cannot eliminate all risks, we have stressed safety mindfulness among our staff to further promote safety. Many specific examples are provided herein. The lessons from NAT are translatable to clinical oncology and may help to promote safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26182183     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  7 in total

1.  Increasing Numbers and Reported Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Inpatient Lung Biopsies: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell S von Itzstein; Arjun Gupta; Kristin C Mara; Sahil Khanna; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Which Factors Promote Shared Understanding Between Physicians and Nurses in Inpatient Oncology Care Settings?: A Qualitative Exploration.

Authors:  Kaycee Crist; Megan Lafferty; Elizabeth Umberfield; Milisa Manojlovich
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions of medication errors in an adult oncology department in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Waleed Alharbi; Jennifer Cleland; Zoe Morrison
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Increased reporting but decreased mortality associated with adverse events in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery: Competing forces in an era of heightened focus on care quality?

Authors:  Mitchell S von Itzstein; Arjun Gupta; Kemp H Kernstine; Kristin C Mara; Sahil Khanna; David E Gerber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Factors contributing to cancer-related suicide: A study of root-cause analysis reports.

Authors:  Maya Aboumrad; Brian Shiner; Natalie Riblet; Peter D Mills; Bradley V Watts
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Common Error Pathways in CyberKnife™ Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Brandon T Mullins; Lukasz Mazur; Michael Dance; Ross McGurk; Eric Schreiber; Lawrence B Marks; Colette J Shen; Michael V Lawrence; Bhishamjit S Chera
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Promoting safety mindfulness: Recommendations for the design and use of simulation-based training in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lukasz M Mazur; Lawrence B Marks; Ron McLeod; Waldemar Karwowski; Prithima Mosaly; Gregg Tracton; Robert D Adams; Lesley Hoyle; Shiva Das; Bhishamjit Chera
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.