Literature DB >> 26181505

Risk Acceptance and Desire for Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans: A Survey of 350.

Aicha Hull1, Teresa Friedman, Heath Christianson, Gregory Moore, Ryan Walsh, Brandon Wills.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The dual goals of this study were to assess the level of radiation risk parents are comfortable with and also whether they expect a shared decision making conversation.
METHODS: A convenience sample of adult patients in the emergency department was surveyed. Participants were educated regarding the associated radiation risk with computed tomography (CT) scans. They were then surveyed about their willingness to accept the risk of radiation exposure to their children given varying degrees of pretest probability of a clinically significant finding. Additionally, participants were surveyed regarding whether a physician should provide shared decision making.
RESULTS: A total of 350 surveys were collected. For low, moderate, and high pretest probability of a positive finding on CT, the proportion of participants who would want a CT for their child was 37% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 32-43%), 70% (95% CI, 65-75%), and 89% (95% CI, 85-92%), respectively. If the likelihood of a positive CT scan was very low (<5%), 24% (95% CI, 20-29%) were willing to have the study performed on their child. Participants would not want a CT for their child regardless of the probability of finding significant pathology in 9% of those surveyed (28/315). Participants wanted a physician to counsel them before ordering a potentially dangerous test in 93% of the surveys. In a test with an estimated 1:1000 risk of cancer, 91% of participants felt that a doctor should always discuss the risk before ordering the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents are less willing to accept the risk of radiation from CT scan on their child as the likelihood of positive findings decrease. Parents overwhelmingly want an informed discussion before getting a potentially dangerous test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26181505     DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  5 in total

1.  Emergency Department Patients' Perceptions of Radiation From Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Michael D Repplinger; Annabel J Li; James E Svenson; William J Ehlenbach; Ryan P Westergaard; Scott B Reeder; Elizabeth A Jacobs
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2016-02

Review 2.  Shared Decision-Making with Parents of Acutely Ill Children: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Paul L Aronson; Eugene D Shapiro; Linda M Niccolai; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 3.  Radiation dose awareness and disclosure practice in paediatric emergency medicine: how far have we come?

Authors:  Kathy Boutis; Karen E Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Maximizing Benefit and Minimizing Risk in Medical Imaging Use: An Educational Primer for Health Care Professions Students.

Authors:  Diane Armao; Terry S Hartman; Christopher M Shea; Laurence Katz; Tracey Thurnes; J Keith Smith
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2018-09-10

5.  Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.658

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.