Marla E Eisenberg1, Amy L Gower1, Barbara J McMorris1, Michaela M Bucchianeri1. 1. Marla E. Eisenberg and Amy L. Gower are with the Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Barbara J. McMorris is with the School of Nursing, University of Minnesota. Michaela M. Bucchianeri is with the Department of Psychological Science, Gustavus Adolphus College, Saint Peter, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined perpetration of bullying among youths in vulnerable groups relative to youths in peer groups not categorized as vulnerable. METHODS: Data were collected in 2013 from a large school-based survey of adolescents conducted in Minnesota (n = 122,180). We used the χ(2) test and logistic regression to compare measures of perpetration of physical and relational bullying, as well as experiences of victimization and perpetration (or both), across categories of sexual orientation, weight status, and disability status. RESULTS: Rates of physical and relational bullying perpetration were significantly higher among youths in vulnerable groups than among those not in vulnerable groups. With respect to context of victimization experiences, young men and women from vulnerable groups were overrepresented in the group comprising both perpetrators and victims. For example, odds of being both a perpetrator and a victim were 1.41 to 3.22 times higher among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths than among heterosexual youths. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerable youths, who are prone to peer harassment, may also act as perpetrators of bullying. Prevention strategies should address the particular needs of these populations; targeted programming may be appropriate.
OBJECTIVES: We examined perpetration of bullying among youths in vulnerable groups relative to youths in peer groups not categorized as vulnerable. METHODS: Data were collected in 2013 from a large school-based survey of adolescents conducted in Minnesota (n = 122,180). We used the χ(2) test and logistic regression to compare measures of perpetration of physical and relational bullying, as well as experiences of victimization and perpetration (or both), across categories of sexual orientation, weight status, and disability status. RESULTS: Rates of physical and relational bullying perpetration were significantly higher among youths in vulnerable groups than among those not in vulnerable groups. With respect to context of victimization experiences, young men and women from vulnerable groups were overrepresented in the group comprising both perpetrators and victims. For example, odds of being both a perpetrator and a victim were 1.41 to 3.22 times higher among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths than among heterosexual youths. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerable youths, who are prone to peer harassment, may also act as perpetrators of bullying. Prevention strategies should address the particular needs of these populations; targeted programming may be appropriate.
Authors: Marla E Eisenberg; Darin J Erickson; Amy L Gower; Len Kne; Ryan J Watson; Heather L Corliss; Elizabeth M Saewyc Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2019-08-24
Authors: Amy L Gower; Myriam Forster; Kari Gloppen; Abigail Z Johnson; Marla E Eisenberg; John E Connett; Iris W Borowsky Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2018-08