| Literature DB >> 26180599 |
Nattaporn Phunchago1, Jintanaporn Wattanathorn2, Kowit Chaisiwamongkol3.
Abstract
Oxidative stress plays an important role in brain dysfunctions induced by alcohol. Since less therapeutic agent against cognitive deficit and brain damage induced by chronic alcohol consumption is less available, we aimed to assess the effect of Tiliacora triandra extract, a plant possessing antioxidant activity, on memory impairment, neuron density, cholinergic function, and oxidative stress in hippocampus of alcoholic rats. Male Wistar rats were induced ethanol dependence condition by semivoluntary intake of alcohol for 15 weeks. Alcoholic rats were orally given T. triandra at doses of 100, 200, and 400 mg·kg(-1)BW for 14 days. Memory assessment was performed every 7 days while neuron density, activities of AChE, SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px and, MDA level in hippocampus were assessed at the end of study. Interestingly, the extract mitigated the increased escape latency, AChE and MDA level. The extract also mitigated the decreased retention time, SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px activities, and neurons density in hippocampus induced by alcohol. These data suggested that the extract improved memory deficit in alcoholic rats partly via the decreased oxidative stress and the suppression of AChE. Therefore, T. triandra is the potential reagent for treating brain dysfunction induced by alcohol. However, further researches are necessary to understand the detail mechanism and possible active ingredient.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26180599 PMCID: PMC4477251 DOI: 10.1155/2015/918426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Gradient program of HPLC analysis.
| Times (minutes) | Solvents (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| A (methanol) | B (2.5% acetic acid) | |
| 0 | 10 | 90 |
| 17 | 70 | 30 |
| 18 | 100 | — |
| 20 | 100 | — |
| 20.5 | 10 | 90 |
| 25 | 10 | 90 |
Figure 1The chromatogram of water extract of T. triandra.
Figure 2The effect of T. triandra on escape latency time in Morris water maze test. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6/group. ### P value < 0.001 compared with control treated group. ∗∗∗ P value < 0.001 compared with ethanol dependence treated group which received vehicle.
Figure 3The effect of T. triandra on retention time in Morris water maze test. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6/group. ### P value < 0.001 compared with control treated group. ∗ P value < 0.05 compared with ethanol dependence treated group which received vehicle. ∗∗∗ P value < 0.001 compared with ethanol dependence treated group which received vehicle.
Figure 4The effect of T. triandra on the activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in hippocampus. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6/group ### P value < 0.001 compared with control treated group. ∗∗ P value < 0.01 compared with ethanol dependence treated group which received vehicle. ∗∗∗ P value < 0.001 compared with ethanol dependence treated group which received vehicle.
Figure 5The effect of T. triandra extract on the neuron density in CA1, CA2, CA3, and dentate gyrus of hippocampus. (a) Photographs showing the density of the neurons stained with cresyl violet; (b) the bar graph showing density of neurons in various subregions of hippocampus. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6/group. ### P value < 0.001 compared with control treated group. ∗∗∗ P value < 0.001 compared with ethanol dependence treated group which received vehicle.
The effect of T. triandra extract on oxidative stress markers including malondialdehyde (MDA) level and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in hippocampus.
| Groups/oxidative stress markers | MDA | SOD | CAT | GSH-Px |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.0017 ± 0.0002*** | 2.80 ± 0.39*** | 12.38 ± 0.61** | 3.473 ± 0.43** |
| Ethanol + vehicle | 0.012 ± 0.0007### | 0.98 ± 0.31### | 8.65 ± 1.73## | 2.473 ± 0.18## |
| Ethanol + donepezil | 0.005 ± 0.0003*** | 2.80 ± 0.39*** | 13.18 ± 1.95** | 4.620 ± 0.61** |
| Ethanol + vitamin C | 0.004 ± 0.0007*** | 2.80 ± 0.39*** | 10.91 ± 0.64* | 3.013 ± 0.10 |
| Ethanol + | 0.005 ± 0.0005*** | 1.62 ± 0.43** | 12.877 ± 0.72** | 4.30 ± 0.53** |
| Ethanol + | 0.004 ± 0.0005*** | 2.12 ± 0.27*** | 11.55 ± 1.09** | 6.29 ± 0.52*** |
| Ethanol + | 0.004 ± 0.0004*** | 1.56 ± 0.18** | 9.31 ± 1.63 | 3.92 ± 0.56** |
Values are expressed as means ± SEM from 6 animals in each group.
## P value < 0.01 and ### P value < 0.001 compared with control treated group.
* P value < 0.05, ** P value < 0.01, and *** P value < 0.001 compared with ethanol dependence rats which received vehicle.