| Literature DB >> 26180536 |
Rui Guo1, Yiqin Wang2, Hanxia Yan2, Jianjun Yan3, Fengyin Yuan4, Zhaoxia Xu2, Guoping Liu2, Wenjie Xu2.
Abstract
Objective. This research provides objective and quantitative parameters of the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pulse conditions for distinguishing between patients with the coronary heart disease (CHD) and normal people by using the proposed classification approach based on Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) and random forest. Methods. The energy and the sample entropy features were extracted by applying the HHT to TCM pulse by treating these pulse signals as time series. By using the random forest classifier, the extracted two types of features and their combination were, respectively, used as input data to establish classification model. Results. Statistical results showed that there were significant differences in the pulse energy and sample entropy between the CHD group and the normal group. Moreover, the energy features, sample entropy features, and their combination were inputted as pulse feature vectors; the corresponding average recognition rates were 84%, 76.35%, and 90.21%, respectively. Conclusion. The proposed approach could be appropriately used to analyze pulses of patients with CHD, which can lay a foundation for research on objective and quantitative criteria on disease diagnosis or Zheng differentiation.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26180536 PMCID: PMC4477132 DOI: 10.1155/2015/895749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1IMFs of a pulse graph for a normal subject and a patient with CHD after EMD.
Rank sum test of IMF energy in two groups.
| (Mean rank) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | IMF1 | IMF2 | IMF3 | IMF4 | IMF5 | IMF6 | IMF7 |
| The CHD | 172.10 | 132.50 | 148.68 | 153.93 | 152.81 | 146.98 | 142.89 |
| The normal subjects | 250.65* | 240.32* | 209.35* | 199.29* | 201.45* | 212.59* | 220.43* |
P < 0.001, versus normal group.
Rank sum test of IMF sample entropy in two groups.
| (Mean rank) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | IMF1 | IMF2 | IMF3 | IMF4 | IMF5 | IMF6 | IMF7 |
| The CHD | 180.28 | 188.17 | 156.74 | 143.86 | 150.93 | 158.98 | 164.09 |
| The normal subjects | 148.86* | 133.77* | 193.91* | 218.56* | 205.04* | 189.64* | 179.84 |
P < 0.001, versus normal group.
Average recognition rate of different pulse characteristics obtained using random forest (%).
| Group | Feature | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IMF sample entropy | IMF entropy | Combination of IMF sample entropy and IMF sample entropy | |
| The CHD group | 88.32 ± 3.89 | 89.20 ± 6.76 | 95.49 ± 2.78 |
| The normal group | 53.48 ± 10.15 | 73.99 ± 15.47 | 80.07 ± 9.13 |
| The two groups | 76.35 ± 4.77 | 84.00 ± 5.04 | 90.21 ± 4.09 |