| Literature DB >> 26180534 |
Qi Liu1, Peihai Zhang2, Junjie Pan3, Zhengjie Li1, Jixin Liu4, Guangsen Li5, Wei Qin4, Yaodong You5, Xujun Yu6, Jinbo Sun4, Minghao Dong4, Qiyong Gong7, Jun Guo8, Degui Chang9.
Abstract
Background. Pattern differentiation is the foundation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). This study aims to investigate the differences in cerebral activity in ED patients with different TCM patterns. Methods. 27 psychogenic ED patients and 27 healthy subjects (HS) were enrolled in this study. Each participant underwent an fMRI scan in resting state. The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) was used to detect the brain activity changes in ED patients with different patterns. Results. Compared to HS, ED patients showed an increased cerebral activity in bilateral cerebellum, insula, globus pallidus, parahippocampal gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and middle cingulate cortex (MCC). Compared to the patients with liver-qi stagnation and spleen deficiency pattern (LSSDP), the patients with kidney-yang deficiency pattern (KDP) showed an increased activity in bilateral brainstem, cerebellum, hippocampus, and the right insula, thalamus, MCC, and a decreased activity in bilateral putamen, medial frontal gyrus, temporal pole, and the right caudate nucleus, OFC, anterior cingulate cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex (P < 0.005). Conclusions. The ED patients with different TCM patterns showed different brain activities. The differences in cerebral activity between LSSDP and KDP were mainly in the emotion-related regions, including prefrontal cortex and cingulated cortex.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26180534 PMCID: PMC4477190 DOI: 10.1155/2015/503536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison between psychogenic ED patients and healthy subjects: clinical variables.
| Characteristic | ED patients | Healthy subjects |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y), mean ± SD | 33.22 ± 5.92 | 31.41 ± 5.82 | 0.261 |
| Weight (Kg), mean ± SD | 65.11 ± 6.66 | 66.52 ± 9.47 | 0.530 |
| Height (cm), mean ± SD | 171.67 ± 3.98 | 171.41 ± 4.37 | 0.821 |
| IIEF-5 (0–25), mean ± SD | 13.56 ± 3.61 | 22.26 ± 0.95 | 0.000 |
| EHS (1–4), mean ± SD | 2.70 ± 0.54 | 3.93 ± 0.27 | 0.000 |
| SEAR (0–80), mean ± SD | 32.38 ± 11.14 | 68.36 ± 4.96 | 0.000 |
| QEQ (0–100), mean ± SD | 33.63 ± 15.44 | 80.04 ± 7.20 | 0.000 |
Comparison between psychogenic ED patients and healthy subjects: resting brain activity.
| Regions | Sign | Side | Talairach |
| BA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Cerebellum | ↑ | R | 11 | −64 | −50 | 3.40 | — |
| ↑ | L | −26 | −37 | −35 | 3.13 | — | |
| Insula | ↑ | R | 32 | 23 | −2 | 3.48 | BA47 |
| ↑ | L | −32 | 22 | −3 | 4.06 | BA48 | |
| Globus pallidus | ↑ | R | 20 | 2 | 8 | 2.66 | — |
| ↑ | L | −10 | 1 | −1 | 2.75 | — | |
| Parahippocampal gyrus | ↑ | R | 33 | −25 | −17 | 3.29 | BA20 |
| ↑ | L | −25 | −24 | −16 | 3.03 | BA20 | |
| OFC | ↑ | R | 8 | 30 | −13 | 3.13 | BA11 |
| ↑ | L | −7 | 29 | −12 | 2.68 | BA11 | |
| MCC | ↑ | R | 11 | 23 | 38 | 2.79 | BA32 |
| ↑ | L | −7 | 20 | 36 | 2.81 | BA32 | |
| Putamen | ↑ | R | 23 | 0 | 8 | 2.56 | — |
| Superior temporal gyrus | ↑ | R | 44 | −42 | 7 | 4.01 | BA21 |
| Rectus gyrus | ↑ | L | −7 | 30 | −17 | 2.99 | BA11 |
| Supplementary motor area | ↑ | L | −10 | 0 | 67 | 2.72 | BA6 |
| ↑ | L | −8 | 16 | 48 | 3.98 | BA32 | |
| Brainstem | ↓ | R | 3 | −35 | −30 | −3.13 | — |
| ↓ | L | −1 | −34 | −29 | −2.88 | — | |
| Precentral gyrus | ↓ | L | −44 | 2 | 42 | −3.23 | BA6 |
| MCC | ↓ | R | 2 | −28 | 34 | −3.40 | BA23 |
| Superior parietal lobule | ↓ | R | 16 | −44 | 66 | −2.83 | BA5 |
| Superiortemporalgyrus | ↓ | R | 60 | −10 | 11 | −4 | BA48 |
| Precuneus | ↓ | R | 10 | −65 | 37 | −2.80 | BA7 |
| ↓ | L | −10 | −65 | 35 | −3.05 | BA7 | |
“Sign” indicates whether the structure showed a signal increase or decrease. “↑/↓”: increase/decrease. R: right; L: left; BA: Brodmann area; OFC: orbitofrontal cortex; MCC: middle cingulate cortex; P < 0.005, a minimal cluster size of 50 voxels.
Figure 1The differences in cerebral activities between psychogenic ED patients with different TCM patterns. (a) The differences in cerebral activities between psychogenic ED patients and HS. Compared to HS, psychogenic ED patients showed abnormal cerebral activity in brainstem, cerebellum, basal ganglia, and multiple limbic regions including insula, MCC, PFC, parahippocampal gyrus, and parietal, temporal lobes. (P < 0.005, a minimal cluster size of 50 voxels). (b) The differences in cerebral activities between ED patients with different TCM patterns. The brain regions associated with emotion modulation such as cerebellum, OFC, ACC, and MCC are the main different brain areas between psychogenic ED patients with kidney-yang deficiency pattern and liver-qi stagnation and spleen deficiency pattern (P < 0.005, a minimal cluster size of 50 voxels).
Comparison between psychogenic ED patients with liver-qi stagnation and spleen deficiency pattern and kidney-yang deficiency pattern: clinical variables.
| Kidney-yang deficiency pattern | Liver-qi stagnation and spleen deficiency pattern |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y), mean ± SD | 32.90 ± 5.89 | 32.10 ± 3.17 | 0.71 |
| Weight (Kg), mean ± SD | 65.30 ± 11.10 | 66.90 ± 6.36 | 0.70 |
| Height (cm), mean ± SD | 172.00 ± 5.14 | 173.60 ± 4.09 | 0.45 |
| IIEF-5 (0–25), mean ± SD | 14.20 ± 3.85 | 15.00 ± 2.16 | 0.58 |
| EHS (1–4), mean ± SD | 2.90 ± 0.32 | 2.90 ± 0.32 | 1.00 |
| SEAR (0–80), mean ± SD | 31.41 ± 10.14 | 33.14 ± 7.32 | 0.67 |
| QEQ (0–100), mean ± SD | 33.36 ± 16.79 | 31.28 ± 5.29 | 0.71 |
| SDS (0–100), mean ± SD | 30.75 ± 1.46 | 39.99 ± 7.61 | 0.003 |
| SAS (0–100), mean ± SD | 30.38 ± 1.77 | 38.00 ± 6.41 | 0.002 |
Comparison between psychogenic ED patients with liver-qi stagnation and spleen deficiency pattern and kidney-yang deficiency pattern: resting brain activity.
| Regions | Sign | Side | Talairach |
| BA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Brainstem | ↑ | R | 8 | −19 | 7 | 3.21 | — |
| ↑ | L | −7 | −23 | −10 | 3.13 | — | |
| Cerebellum | ↑ | R | 14 | −51 | −31 | 3.54 | — |
| ↑ | L | −14 | −66 | −22 | 4.82 | — | |
| Hippocampus | ↑ | R | 22 | −30 | −4 | 3.48 | BA27 |
| ↑ | L | −31 | −35 | 4 | 3.59 | BA37 | |
| Insula | ↑ | R | 39 | −7 | 17 | 3.16 | BA48 |
| Thalamus | ↑ | R | 10 | −21 | 1 | 3.07 | — |
| Paracentral lobule | ↑ | R | 8 | −33 | 53 | 3.13 | BA4 |
| MCC | ↑ | R | 2 | −15 | 48 | 2.88 | BA23 |
| Superior temporal gyrus | ↑ | R | 57 | −33 | 11 | 3.16 | BA22 |
| Inferior temporal gyrus | ↑ | R | 59 | −42 | −15 | 4 | BA20 |
| Middle temporal gyrus | ↑ | L | −43 | −50 | 20 | 3.4 | BA39 |
| Putamen | ↓ | R | 24 | 13 | −2 | −2.94 | — |
| ↓ | L | −22 | 18 | 3 | −3.61 | — | |
| Medial frontal gyrus | ↓ | R | 13 | 57 | 25 | −2.58 | BA10 |
| ↓ | R | 8 | 29 | 54 | −3.48 | BA8 | |
| ↓ | L | −1 | 41 | 30 | −2.64 | BA32 | |
| Middle frontal gyrus | ↓ | L | −35 | 49 | 11 | −4.47 | BA10 |
| Supplementary motor area | ↓ | L | −4 | 17 | 46 | −3.59 | BA6 |
| OFC | ↓ | R | 8 | 51 | −4 | −3.02 | BA10 |
| ACC | ↓ | R | 11 | 24 | 29 | −2.59 | BA23 |
| PCC | ↓ | R | 4 | −49 | 26 | −2.72 | BA30 |
| Middle temporal gyrus | ↓ | R | 51 | −39 | 2 | −3.46 | BA21 |
| Precuneus | ↓ | R | 8 | −64 | 33 | −3.95 | — |
| ↓ | L | −3 | −68 | 37 | −2.99 | BA7 | |
“Sign” indicates whether the structure showed a signal increase or decrease. “↑/↓”: increase/decrease. R: right; L: left; BA: Brodmann area; OFC: orbitofrontal cortex; ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; MCC: middle cingulate cortex; PCC: posterior cingulate cortex.
P < 0.005, a minimal cluster size of 50 voxels.