Sir,Patten et al. in their interesting study compared complications in the management of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) treated with benzodiazepine and pentobarbital infusions. The authors addressed that children with RSE, who required pentobarbital therapy had a longer hospital stay and were more likely develop hypotension, require inotropic support, need intubation, mechanical ventilation, peripheral nutrition, and blood products. Furthermore, they were more likely to develop hypertension and movement disorder after or during weaning.[1] I presume that these results ought to be cautiously taken owing to the presence of the following three limitations. (1) The data were taken from a single center. (2) The study period was relatively short (3 years). (3) The size of the studied cohort was small (n = 28). Conducting a large scale multicenter study over an extended period could better evaluate that the issue. Despite the aforementioned three limitations, the observation in Patten et al's. study[1] on more complications associated with pentobarbital infusion compared to benzodiazepine infusion renders pentobarbital less recommended first-line in treating patients with RSE. This observation supports the recently published Indian consensus guidelines on the management of childhood convulsive status epilepticus[2] and recommendations of the Italian League Against Epilepsy,[3] which stress that the initial management of RSE should consist of a parenteral benzodiazepine (lorazepam, diazepam, or midazolam) by any route feasible and when first-line anti-epileptic drugs fail, sodium phenytoin, and phenobarbital should be used.