| Literature DB >> 26180286 |
Diego Macias1, Elisa Garcia-Gorriz1, Chiara Piroddi1, Adolf Stips1.
Abstract
The temporal dynamics of biogeochemical variables derived from a coupled 3-D model of the Mediterranean Sea are evaluated for the last 50 years (1960-2010) against independent data on fisheries catch per unit effort (CPUE) for the same time period. Concordant patterns are found in the time series of all of the biological variables (from the model and from fisheries statistics), with low values at the beginning of the series, a later increase, with maximum levels reached at the end of the 1990s, and a posterior stabilization. Spectral analysis of the annual biological time series reveals coincident low-frequency signals in all of them. The first, more energetic signal peaks around the year 2000, while the second, less energetic signal peaks near 1982. Almost identical low-frequency signals are found in the nutrient loads of the rivers and in the integrated nutrient levels in the surface marine ecosystem. Nitrate concentration shows a maximum level in 1998, with a later stabilization to present-day values, coincident with the first low-frequency signal found in the biological series. Phosphate shows maximum concentrations around 1982 and a posterior sharp decline, in concordance with the second low-frequency signal observed in the biological series. That result seems to indicate that the control of marine productivity (plankton to fish) in the Mediterranean is principally mediated through bottom-up processes that could be traced back to the characteristics of riverine discharges. The high sensitivity of CPUE time series to environmental conditions might be another indicator of the overexploitation of this marine ecosystem. KEY POINTS: Biogeochemical evolution of the Mediterranean over the past 50 yearsRiver nutrient loads drive primary and secondary productionsStrong link between low trophic levels and fisheries.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean Sea; biogeochemical cycles; bottom-up control; numerical modeling; riverine nutrient loads
Year: 2014 PMID: 26180286 PMCID: PMC4493898 DOI: 10.1002/2014GB004846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Global Biogeochem Cycles ISSN: 0886-6236 Impact factor: 5.703
Figure 1Model domain. Background color indicates bottom depth as included in the model configuration (isobaths of 100, 1000, and 3000 m are also indicated). Blue stars along the coast indicate the position of the 37 rivers included in the model setup. The three main rivers of the Mediterranean basin are indicated by larger red dots.
Fitting Parameters for the Statistical Comparisons of Signals 1 of the Different Biological Variables and the Mean Marine Nitrate Concentration Low-Frequency Signal
| Fitted Variable With Marine Nitrate | Equation | |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated PPR (signal 1) | PPR = 3.9 × 10−2 + 2.64 × 100 × Mar_nit | 0.99 ( |
| Integrated zoo biomass (signal 1) | Zoo = −2.82 × 10−3 + 7.4 × 10−1 × Mar_nit | 0.99 ( |
| CPUE (signal 1) | CPUE = -2.3 × 10−5 + 3.39 × 10−3 × Mar_nit | 0.99 ( |
Figure 2(a) Annual time series of biological variables; integrated primary production rate (PPR), blue line (mmol N m−2 d−1); integrated zooplankton biomass, orange line (mmol N m−2 d−1) and catches per unit effort (CPUE), black line (tons GT−1) during the analyzed period. (b) Scatterplot of PPR versus CPUE (blue dots) and zooplankton biomass versus CPUE (orange dots). Statistics of the linear fittings (blue and orange lines) are inserted.
Energy of the Annual Series Associated to Each of the Identified Signals With the SSA
| Variable | Signal 1 | Signal 2 | Σ Energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrated PPR | 43.6% | 23.21% | 66.8% |
| Integrated zoo biomass | 52.27% | 26.77% | 79.05% |
| CPUE | 51.6% | 27.43% | 83.1% |
| Marine nitrate | 59.6% | -- | 59.6% |
| Marine phosphate | 69.7% | -- | 69.7% |
| Riverine nitrate | 59.13% | -- | 59.13% |
| Riverine phosphate | 41.8% | -- | 41.8% |
Figure 3(a) Main signals found in the biological time series using SSA. (b) Secondary signals found in the biological time series using SSA. (c) Scatterplot of the main signals found in PPR versus the main signals found in the CPUE time series. Statistics of the linear fit is inserted. (d) Scatterplot of the main signals found in zooplankton biomass versus the main signals found in the CPUE time series. Statistics of the linear fit is inserted.
Figure 4(a) Main signals in the nutrients time series from the Ebro, Rhone, and Po rivers obtained with the SSA. (b) Main signals in the integrated (0–100 m) nutrients time series from the entire Mediterranean basin obtained with the SSA. (c) Scatterplot of the nitrate signal in the entire basin versus the first signal obtained from the different biological time series. (d) Scatterplot of the phosphate signal in the entire basin versus the second signal obtained from the different biological time series.
Statistical Fit Between the Low-Frequency Signals in the Riverine Nutrient Loads and the Low-Frequency Signals in the Mean Marine Nutrient Concentrations
| Equation | |
|---|---|
| Mean_marine_nit = 4.38 × 10−2 + 5.18 × 10−3 × Riv_nit | |
| Mean_marine_pho = 3.7 × 10−7 + 3.24 × 10−5 × Riv_pho |
Fitting Parameters for the Statistical Comparisons of Signals 2 of the Different Biological Variables and the Mean Marine Phosphate
| Fitted Variable With Marine Phosphate | Equation | |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated PPR (signal 2) | PPR = −1.66 × 10−1 + 5.4 × 104 × Mar_pho | 0.98 ( |
| Integrated zoo biomass (signal 2) | Zoo = −3.87 × 10−2 + 1.36 × 104 × Mar_pho | 0.99 ( |
| CPUE (signal 2) | CPUE = −1.24 × 10−4 + 5.37 × 101 × Mar_pho | 0.98 ( |