BACKGROUND: Postprandial lipemia represents a risk factor for chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes. Little is known about the effect of dietary fat on the plasma lipidome in the postprandial period. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of dairy fat and soy oil on circulating postprandial lipids in men. METHODS:Men (40-60 y old, nonsmokers; n = 16) were randomly assigned in a crossover design to consume 2 breakfast meals of dairy-based or soy oil-based foods. The changes in the plasma lipidome during the 4-h postprandial period were analyzed with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and included 316 lipid species in 23 classes and subclasses, representing sphingolipids, phospholipids, glycerolipids, and sterols. RESULTS: Nonparametric Friedman tests showed significant changes in multiple plasma lipid classes, subclasses, and species in the postprandial period after both dairy and soy meals. No difference was found in triglyceridemia after each meal. However, 6 endogenous lipid classes increased after dairy but decreased after soy (P < 0.05), including ether-linked phospholipids and plasmalogens and sphingomyelin (not present in soy), dihexosylceramide, and GM3 ganglioside. Phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol were not affected by the soy meal but were significantly elevated after the dairy meal (8.3% and 16%, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The changes in postprandial plasma phospholipids in men relate to the diet composition and the relative size of the endogenous phospholipid pools. Despite similar lipemic responses as measured by changes in triglyceride concentrations, the differential responses to dairy and soy meals derived through lipidomic analysis of phospholipids suggest differences in the metabolism of soybean oil and dairy fat. The increased concentrations of plasmalogens, with potential antioxidant capacity, in the postprandial period after dairy but not soy meals may represent a further important difference in the response to these sources of fat. The trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12610000562077.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Postprandial lipemia represents a risk factor for chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes. Little is known about the effect of dietary fat on the plasma lipidome in the postprandial period. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of dairy fat and soy oil on circulating postprandial lipids in men. METHODS:Men (40-60 y old, nonsmokers; n = 16) were randomly assigned in a crossover design to consume 2 breakfast meals of dairy-based or soy oil-based foods. The changes in the plasma lipidome during the 4-h postprandial period were analyzed with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and included 316 lipid species in 23 classes and subclasses, representing sphingolipids, phospholipids, glycerolipids, and sterols. RESULTS: Nonparametric Friedman tests showed significant changes in multiple plasma lipid classes, subclasses, and species in the postprandial period after both dairy and soy meals. No difference was found in triglyceridemia after each meal. However, 6 endogenous lipid classes increased after dairy but decreased after soy (P < 0.05), including ether-linked phospholipids and plasmalogens and sphingomyelin (not present in soy), dihexosylceramide, and GM3ganglioside. Phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol were not affected by the soy meal but were significantly elevated after the dairy meal (8.3% and 16%, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The changes in postprandial plasma phospholipids in men relate to the diet composition and the relative size of the endogenous phospholipid pools. Despite similar lipemic responses as measured by changes in triglyceride concentrations, the differential responses to dairy and soy meals derived through lipidomic analysis of phospholipids suggest differences in the metabolism of soybean oil and dairy fat. The increased concentrations of plasmalogens, with potential antioxidant capacity, in the postprandial period after dairy but not soy meals may represent a further important difference in the response to these sources of fat. The trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12610000562077.
Authors: Michelle Averill; Katya B Rubinow; Kevin Cain; Jake Wimberger; Ilona Babenko; Jessica O Becker; Karen E Foster-Schubert; David E Cummings; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Tomas Vaisar Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Dong D Wang; Estefanía Toledo; Adela Hruby; Bernard A Rosner; Walter C Willett; Qi Sun; Cristina Razquin; Yan Zheng; Miguel Ruiz-Canela; Marta Guasch-Ferré; Dolores Corella; Enrique Gómez-Gracia; Miquel Fiol; Ramón Estruch; Emilio Ros; José Lapetra; Montserrat Fito; Fernando Aros; Luis Serra-Majem; Chih-Hao Lee; Clary B Clish; Liming Liang; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Miguel A Martínez-González; Frank B Hu Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rebekah J Nicholson; Marie K Norris; Annelise M Poss; William L Holland; Scott A Summers Journal: Annu Rev Nutr Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 9.323
Authors: Maura E Walker; Vanessa Xanthakis; Linda R Peterson; Meredith S Duncan; Joowon Lee; Jiantao Ma; Sherman Bigornia; Lynn L Moore; Paula A Quatromoni; Ramachandran S Vasan; Paul F Jacques Journal: J Nutr Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Lisa M Sedger; Dedreia L Tull; Malcolm J McConville; David P De Souza; Thusitha W T Rupasinghe; Spencer J Williams; Saravanan Dayalan; Daniel Lanzer; Helen Mackie; Thomas C Lam; John Boyages Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 3.240