Literature DB >> 26180206

Reward Region Responsivity Predicts Future Weight Gain and Moderating Effects of the TaqIA Allele.

Eric Stice1, Kyle S Burger2, Sonja Yokum3.   

Abstract

Because no large prospective study has investigated neural vulnerability factors that predict future weight gain, we tested whether neural response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food and monetary reward predicted body fat gain over a 3-year follow-up in healthy-weight adolescent humans and whether the TaqIA polymorphism moderates these relations. A total of 153 adolescents completed fMRI paradigms assessing response to these events; body fat was assessed annually over follow-up. Elevated orbitofrontal cortex response to cues signaling impending milkshake receipt predicted future body fat gain (r = 0.32), which is a novel finding that provides support for the incentive sensitization theory of obesity. Neural response to receipt and anticipated receipt of monetary reward did not predict body fat gain, which has not been tested previously. Replicating an earlier finding (Stice et al., 2008a), elevated caudate response to milkshake receipt predicted body fat gain for adolescents with a genetic propensity for greater dopamine signaling by virtue of possessing the TaqIA A2/A2 allele, but lower caudate response predicted body fat gain for adolescents with a genetic propensity for less dopamine signaling by virtue of possessing a TaqIA A1 allele, though this interaction was only marginal [p-value <0.05 corrected using voxel-level familywise error rate (pFWE) = 0.06]. Parental obesity, which correlated with TaqIA allele status (odds ratio = 2.7), similarly moderated the relation of caudate response to milkshake receipt to future body fat gain, which is another novel finding. The former interaction implies that too much or too little dopamine signaling and reward region responsivity increases risk for overeating, suggesting qualitatively distinct reward surfeit and reward deficit pathways to obesity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Because no large prospective study has investigated neural vulnerability factors that predict future weight gain we tested whether neural response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food and monetary reward predicted body fat gain over 3-year follow-up in healthy-weight adolescent humans and whether the TaqIA polymorphism moderates these relations. Elevated reward activation in response to food cues predicted future body fat gain. Elevated reward response to food receipt predicted body fat gain for adolescents with a TaqIA A2/A2 allele and lower reward response predicted body fat gain for those with a TaqIA A1 allele. Results imply that too much or too little dopamine signaling and reward region responsivity increases risk for overeating.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3510316-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obesity; prospective fMRI; reward sensitivity; weight gain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26180206      PMCID: PMC4502268          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3607-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5' nuclease assay.

Authors:  K J Livak
Journal:  Genet Anal       Date:  1999-02

Review 2.  Body-composition assessment via air-displacement plethysmography in adults and children: a review.

Authors:  David A Fields; Michael I Goran; Megan A McCrory
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Genotyping of three single nucleotide polymorphisms following whole genome preamplification of DNA collected from buccal cells.

Authors:  Brett C Haberstick; Andrew Smolen
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 4.  The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates.

Authors:  Andrea E Cavanna; Michael R Trimble
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold.

Authors:  S D Forman; J D Cohen; M Fitzgerald; W F Eddy; M A Mintun; D C Noll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

7.  Adiposity in adolescents: change in actual BMI works better than change in BMI z score for longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Catherine S Berkey; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Dietary restraint, anxiety, and the relative reinforcing value of snack food in non-obese women.

Authors:  Gary S Goldfield; Christine Legg
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2005-11-28

9.  The effect of practice on a sustained attention task in cocaine abusers.

Authors:  Rita Z Goldstein; Dardo Tomasi; Nelly Alia-Klein; Lei Zhang; Frank Telang; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Relationship between dopaminergic neurotransmission, alcoholism, and Reward Deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  Abdalla Bowirrat; Marlene Oscar-Berman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 3.568

View more
  55 in total

1.  Brain regulation of appetite in twins.

Authors:  Susan J Melhorn; Sonya Mehta; Mario Kratz; Vidhi Tyagi; Mary F Webb; Carolyn J Noonan; Dedra S Buchwald; Jack Goldberg; Kenneth R Maravilla; Thomas J Grabowski; Ellen A Schur
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Overweight adolescents' brain response to sweetened beverages mirrors addiction pathways.

Authors:  Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Eric D Claus; Karen A Hudson; Francesca M Filbey; Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez; Krista M Lisdahl; Alberta S Kong
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  Dietary triglycerides as signaling molecules that influence reward and motivation.

Authors:  Chloé Berland; Céline Cansell; Thomas S Hnasko; Christophe Magnan; Serge Luquet
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-03-18

4.  Good practice in food-related neuroimaging.

Authors:  Paul A M Smeets; Alain Dagher; Todd A Hare; Stephanie Kullmann; Laura N van der Laan; Russell A Poldrack; Hubert Preissl; Dana Small; Eric Stice; Maria G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Homeostasis Meets Motivation in the Battle to Control Food Intake.

Authors:  Carrie R Ferrario; Gwenaël Labouèbe; Shuai Liu; Edward H Nieh; Vanessa H Routh; Shengjin Xu; Eoin C O'Connor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Elevated reward response to receipt of palatable food predicts future weight variability in healthy-weight adolescents.

Authors:  Samantha R Winter; Sonja Yokum; Eric Stice; Karol Osipowicz; Michael R Lowe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Pilot test of a novel food response and attention training treatment for obesity: Brain imaging data suggest actions shape valuation.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum; Harm Veling; Eva Kemps; Natalia S Lawrence
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-04-19

8.  Functional and structural plasticity contributing to obesity: roles for sex, diet, and individual susceptibility.

Authors:  Travis Brown; Carrie R Ferrario; Yanaira Alonso-Caraballo; Emily T Jorgensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-07-29

9.  Relation of neural response to palatable food tastes and images to future weight gain: Using bootstrap sampling to examine replicability of neuroimaging findings.

Authors:  E Stice; S Yokum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  The effect of tobacco cessation on weight gain, obesity, and diabetes risk.

Authors:  Terry Bush; Jennifer C Lovejoy; Mona Deprey; Kelly M Carpenter
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.