Literature DB >> 26180205

Closed-Loop Behavioral Control Increases Coherence in the Fly Brain.

Angelique C Paulk1, Leonie Kirszenblat1, Yanqiong Zhou1, Bruno van Swinderen2.   

Abstract

A crucial function of the brain is to be able to distinguish whether or not changes in the environment are caused by one's own actions. Even the smallest brains appear to be capable of making this distinction, as has been shown by closed-loop behavioral experiments in flies controlling visual stimuli in virtual reality paradigms. We questioned whether activity in the fruit fly brain is different during such closed-loop behavior, compared with passive viewing of a stimulus. To address this question, we used a procedure to record local field potential (LFP) activity across the fly brain while flies were controlling a virtual object through their movement on an air-supported ball. The virtual object was flickered at a precise frequency (7 Hz), creating a frequency tag that allowed us to track brain responses to the object while animals were behaving. Following experiments under closed-loop control, we replayed the same stimulus to the fly in open loop, such that it could no longer control the stimulus. We found identical receptive fields and similar strength of frequency tags across the brain for the virtual object under closed loop and replay. However, when comparing central versus peripheral brain regions, we found that brain responses were differentially modulated depending on whether flies were in control or not. Additionally, coherence of LFP activity in the brain increased when flies were in control, compared with replay, even if motor behavior was similar. This suggests that processes associated with closed-loop control promote temporal coordination in the insect brain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We show that closed-loop control of a visual stimulus promotes temporal coordination across the Drosophila brain, compared with open-loop replay of the same visual sequences. This is significant because it suggests that, to understand goal-directed behavior or visual attention in flies, it may be most informative to sample neural activity from multiple regions across the brain simultaneously, and to examine temporal relationships (e.g., coherence) between these regions.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3510304-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; SSVEP; behavior; closed-loop; electrophysiology; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26180205      PMCID: PMC6605338          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0691-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies.

Authors:  R M Olberg; A H Worthington; K R Venator
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Detection of object motion by a fly neuron during simulated flight.

Authors:  B Kimmerle; M Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Choice behavior of Drosophila facing contradictory visual cues.

Authors:  S Tang; A Guo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Stimulus locking and feature selectivity prevail in complementary frequency ranges of V1 local field potentials.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Peter König
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Small object detection neurons in female hoverflies.

Authors:  Karin Nordström; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The operant and the classical in conditioned orientation of Drosophila melanogaster at the flight simulator.

Authors:  B Brembs; M Heisenberg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Context generalization in Drosophila visual learning requires the mushroom bodies.

Authors:  L Liu; R Wolf; R Ernst; M Heisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Salience modulates 20-30 Hz brain activity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Bruno van Swinderen; Ralph J Greenspan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Visual pattern recognition in Drosophila is invariant for retinal position.

Authors:  Shiming Tang; Reinhard Wolf; Shuping Xu; Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Attention-like processes in insects.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sleep regulates visual selective attention in Drosophila.

Authors:  Leonie Kirszenblat; Deniz Ertekin; Joseph Goodsell; Yanqiong Zhou; Paul J Shaw; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  The Yin and Yang of Sleep and Attention.

Authors:  Leonie Kirszenblat; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Visuo-Motor Feedback Modulates Neural Activities in the Medulla of the Honeybee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Claire Rusch; Diego Alonso San Alberto; Jeffrey A Riffell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A decentralised neural model explaining optimal integration of navigational strategies in insects.

Authors:  Xuelong Sun; Shigang Yue; Michael Mangan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  The Effect of Common Signals on Power, Coherence and Granger Causality: Theoretical Review, Simulations, and Empirical Analysis of Fruit Fly LFPs Data.

Authors:  Dror Cohen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-25

7.  Visual experience drives sleep need in Drosophila.

Authors:  Leonie Kirszenblat; Rebecca Yaun; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Local Versus Global Effects of Isoflurane Anesthesia on Visual Processing in the Fly Brain.

Authors:  Dror Cohen; Oressia H Zalucki; Bruno van Swinderen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-08-01

9.  Pulsed Light Stimulation Increases Boundary Preference and Periodicity of Episodic Motor Activity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Shuang Qiu; Chengfeng Xiao; R Meldrum Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Isoflurane Impairs Low-Frequency Feedback but Leaves High-Frequency Feedforward Connectivity Intact in the Fly Brain.

Authors:  Dror Cohen; Bruno van Swinderen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.