Literature DB >> 26180069

Biological auctions with multiple rewards.

Johannes G Reiter1, Ayush Kanodia2, Raghav Gupta2, Martin A Nowak3, Krishnendu Chatterjee2.   

Abstract

The competition for resources among cells, individuals or species is a fundamental characteristic of evolution. Biological all-pay auctions have been used to model situations where multiple individuals compete for a single resource. However, in many situations multiple resources with various values exist and single reward auctions are not applicable. We generalize the model to multiple rewards and study the evolution of strategies. In biological all-pay auctions the bid of an individual corresponds to its strategy and is equivalent to its payment in the auction. The decreasingly ordered rewards are distributed according to the decreasingly ordered bids of the participating individuals. The reproductive success of an individual is proportional to its fitness given by the sum of the rewards won minus its payments. Hence, successful bidding strategies spread in the population. We find that the results for the multiple reward case are very different from the single reward case. While the mixed strategy equilibrium in the single reward case with more than two players consists of mostly low-bidding individuals, we show that the equilibrium can convert to many high-bidding individuals and a few low-bidding individuals in the multiple reward case. Some reward values lead to a specialization among the individuals where one subpopulation competes for the rewards and the other subpopulation largely avoids costly competitions. Whether the mixed strategy equilibrium is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) depends on the specific values of the rewards.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Keywords:  auction theory; evolutionarily stable strategy; evolutionary dynamics; evolutionary game theory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26180069      PMCID: PMC4528522          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Evolutionary cycles of cooperation and defection.

Authors:  Lorens A Imhof; Drew Fudenberg; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The one-third law of evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Pedro Bordalo; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Evolutionary game dynamics in a Wright-Fisher process.

Authors:  Lorens A Imhof; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Exploration dynamics in evolutionary games.

Authors:  Arne Traulsen; Christoph Hauert; Hannelore De Silva; Martin A Nowak; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biological markets.

Authors:  R Noë; P Hammerstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  The war of attrition with random rewards.

Authors:  D T Bishop; C Cannings; J M Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1978-10-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.

Authors:  M Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cheating in evolutionary games.

Authors:  M R Rose
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1978-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Evolutionary dynamics of biological auctions.

Authors:  Krishnendu Chatterjee; Johannes G Reiter; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk-aware multi-armed bandit problem with application to portfolio selection.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Huo; Feng Fu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  How successful are mutants in multiplayer games with fluctuating environments? Sojourn times, fixation and optimal switching.

Authors:  Joseph W Baron; Tobias Galla
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  DISSEQT-DIStribution-based modeling of SEQuence space Time dynamics.

Authors:  R Henningsson; G Moratorio; A V Bordería; M Vignuzzi; M Fontes
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2019-08-05

4.  Action in auctions: neural and computational mechanisms of bidding behaviour.

Authors:  Mario Martinez-Saito; Rodion Konovalov; Michael A Piradov; Anna Shestakova; Boris Gutkin; Vasily Klucharev
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.386

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.