Chen-Hsun Ho1,2, Jui-Ling Hsu3, Shih-Ping Liu2,4, Lih-Ching Hsu3, Wei-Ling Chang3,5, Chuck C-K Chao6, Jih-Hwa Guh3. 1. Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. School of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Division of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 6. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug repurposing of phentolamine, an α-adrenoceptor antagonist, as an anticancer agent has been studied in human castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Cell proliferation was examined by sulforhodamine B and CFSE staining assays. Cell cycle progression and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) were detected by flow cytometric analysis. Protein expression was detected by Western blotting. Effect on tubulin/microtubule was determined using confocal immunofluorescence microscopic examination, microtubule assembly detection, tubulin turbidity assay, and binding assay. Several assessments were used to characterize apoptotic signaling pathways and combinatory effect. RESULTS: Phentolamine induced anti-proliferative effect in PC-3 and DU-145, two CRPC cell lines, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) overexpressing cells. This effect was not significantly reduced in paclitaxel-resistant cells. Rhodamine 123 efflux assay showed that phentolamine was not a P-gp substrate. Phentolamine induced mitotic arrest of the cell cycle and formation of hyperdiploid cells, followed by an increase of apoptosis. Mitotic arrest was confirmed by cyclin B1 up-regulation, Cdk1 activation, and a dramatic increase of mitotic protein phosphorylation. Both in vitro and cellular identification demonstrated that phentolamine, similar to paclitaxel, induced tubulin polymerization and formation of multiple nuclei. Besides, it did not compete with paclitaxel binding on tubulin. Phentolamine induced the phosphorylation and degradation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, two anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, and the loss of ΔΨm indicating the induction of mitochondrial damage. It ultimately induced the activation of caspase-9, -8, and -3 and apoptotic cell death. Moreover, combination treatment with phentolamine and paclitaxel caused a synergistic apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that phentolamine is a potential anticancer agent. In contrast to a wide variety of microtubule disrupting agents, phentolamine induces microtubule assembly, leading to mitotic arrest of the cell cycle which "in turn" induces subsequent mitochondrial damage and activation of related apoptotic signaling pathways in CRPC cells. Furthermore, combination between phentolamine and paclitaxel induces a synergistic apoptotic cell death. Phentolamine has a simple chemical structure and is not a P-gp substrate. Optimization of phentolamine structure may also be a potential approach for further development.
BACKGROUND: Drug repurposing of phentolamine, an α-adrenoceptor antagonist, as an anticancer agent has been studied in human castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Cell proliferation was examined by sulforhodamine B and CFSE staining assays. Cell cycle progression and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) were detected by flow cytometric analysis. Protein expression was detected by Western blotting. Effect on tubulin/microtubule was determined using confocal immunofluorescence microscopic examination, microtubule assembly detection, tubulin turbidity assay, and binding assay. Several assessments were used to characterize apoptotic signaling pathways and combinatory effect. RESULTS:Phentolamine induced anti-proliferative effect in PC-3 and DU-145, two CRPC cell lines, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) overexpressing cells. This effect was not significantly reduced in paclitaxel-resistant cells. Rhodamine 123 efflux assay showed that phentolamine was not a P-gp substrate. Phentolamine induced mitotic arrest of the cell cycle and formation of hyperdiploid cells, followed by an increase of apoptosis. Mitotic arrest was confirmed by cyclin B1 up-regulation, Cdk1 activation, and a dramatic increase of mitotic protein phosphorylation. Both in vitro and cellular identification demonstrated that phentolamine, similar to paclitaxel, induced tubulin polymerization and formation of multiple nuclei. Besides, it did not compete with paclitaxel binding on tubulin. Phentolamine induced the phosphorylation and degradation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, two anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, and the loss of ΔΨm indicating the induction of mitochondrial damage. It ultimately induced the activation of caspase-9, -8, and -3 and apoptotic cell death. Moreover, combination treatment with phentolamine and paclitaxel caused a synergistic apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that phentolamine is a potential anticancer agent. In contrast to a wide variety of microtubule disrupting agents, phentolamine induces microtubule assembly, leading to mitotic arrest of the cell cycle which "in turn" induces subsequent mitochondrial damage and activation of related apoptotic signaling pathways in CRPC cells. Furthermore, combination between phentolamine and paclitaxel induces a synergistic apoptotic cell death. Phentolamine has a simple chemical structure and is not a P-gp substrate. Optimization of phentolamine structure may also be a potential approach for further development.