Literature DB >> 26179389

Case-control study of second-line therapies for type 2 diabetes in combination with metformin and the comparative risks of myocardial infarction and stroke.

J S Floyd1,2, K L Wiggins1, C M Sitlani1,2, J H Flory3,4, S Dublin5,6, N L Smith1,5,6,7, S R Heckbert1,5,6, B M Psaty1,2,5,6.   

Abstract

We conducted a population-based case-control study to assess the myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke risks associated with sulphonylureas and insulin when used in combination with metformin. Cases had type 2 diabetes and used metformin + insulin or metformin + sulphonylureas at the time of a first MI or first stroke between 1995 and 2010; controls used the same treatment combinations and were randomly sampled from the same population. MI and stroke diagnoses and potential confounders were validated by medical record reviews. Compared with metformin + sulphonylurea, metformin + insulin was associated with similar risks of MI or stroke [odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.63-1.52)]. Meta-analysis with another observational study improved the precision of the risk estimate [relative risk 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1.24)]. Current evidence suggests that there may not be large differences in cardiovascular risk associated with the use of insulin or sulphonylureas when used in combination with metformin.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular outcomes; case-control study; comparative safety; insulin; metformin; myocardial infarction; stroke; sulphonylureas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26179389      PMCID: PMC4626290          DOI: 10.1111/dom.12537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  13 in total

1.  Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies.

Authors:  O Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  All-cause mortality as an outcome in epidemiologic studies: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia.

Authors:  Hertzel C Gerstein; Jackie Bosch; Gilles R Dagenais; Rafael Díaz; Hyejung Jung; Aldo P Maggioni; Janice Pogue; Jeffrey Probstfield; Ambady Ramachandran; Matthew C Riddle; Lars E Rydén; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Hypoglycemia, diabetes, and cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Cyrus V Desouza; Geremia B Bolli; Vivian Fonseca
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 17.152

5.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering drugs or strategies in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Rury R Holman; Harald Sourij; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Association between intensification of metformin treatment with insulin vs sulfonylureas and cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Christianne L Roumie; Robert A Greevy; Carlos G Grijalva; Adriana M Hung; Xulei Liu; Harvey J Murff; Tom A Elasy; Marie R Griffin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Silvio E Inzucchi; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse; Michaela Diamant; Ele Ferrannini; Michael Nauck; Anne L Peters; Apostolos Tsapas; Richard Wender; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Myocardial infarction and stroke associated with diuretic based two drug antihypertensive regimens: population based case-control study.

Authors:  Inbal Boger-Megiddo; Susan R Heckbert; Noel S Weiss; Barbara McKnight; Curt D Furberg; Kerri L Wiggins; Joseph A C Delaney; David S Siscovick; Eric B Larson; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Nicholas L Smith; Kenneth M Rice; Nicole L Glazer; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-25

10.  Rationale and design of the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: a comparative effectiveness study (GRADE).

Authors:  David M Nathan; John B Buse; Steven E Kahn; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; Mary E Larkin; Myrlene Staten; Deborah Wexler; John M Lachin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Novel Anti-glycemic Drugs and Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes: Expectations Realized, Promises Unmet.

Authors:  James H Flory; Jenny K Ukena; James S Floyd
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Liraglutide and Metformin alone or combined therapy for type 2 diabetes patients complicated with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Xia Jiang; Xin Chen
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Identifying prevalence and risk factors for metformin non-persistence: a retrospective cohort study using an electronic health record.

Authors:  James H Flory; Scott Justin Keating; David Siscovick; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.