| Literature DB >> 26179169 |
D Kelley1, C Lester2, S Shaw3, A de Laforcade1, C R L Webster1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given the liver's pivotal role in hemostasis and fibrinolysis, the coagulopathy accompanying hepatic disease is complex. HYPOTHESIS/Entities:
Keywords: bilirubin; coagulation; fibrinolysis; hepatic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26179169 PMCID: PMC4895357 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.13441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Intern Med ISSN: 0891-6640 Impact factor: 3.333
TEG variables in dogs with acute liver disease.
| Variables | ALD Mean ± SD | Reference Range Mean ± SD | Number Above Reference | Number Below Reference |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5.0 ± 2.1 | 4.33 ± 1.26 | 4 | 0 | .003 |
|
| 5.1 ± 5.3 | 2.11 ± 0.69 | 8 | 0 | .092 |
| Maximum amplitude (mm) | 42.1 ± 18.5 | 54.7 ± 4.7 | 2 | 11 | .00001 |
| Angle (o) | 46.5 ± 17.6 | 62.4 ± 7.1 | 0 | 10 | .0001 |
|
| 4.6 ± 3.1 | 6.16 ± 1.14 | 2 | 11 | .0007 |
| LY30 (%) | 14.5 ± 22.4 | 0.68 ± 1.18 | 8 | 0 | .008 |
P‐value for comparison of TEG variables between dogs with acute liver disease and reference range using Student's t‐test. Bonferroni adjusted P < .009.
Hemostatic testing in dogs with acute liver disease.
| Variable | ALD Median (Range) | Reference Median (Range) | Number Above Reference | Number Below Reference |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT (s) | 12.2 (7.1–60) | 7.6 (6.2–9.3) | 13 | 0 | .001 |
| aPTT (s) | 17.9 (12.1–161) | 14.8 (8.9–16.3) | 11 | 0 | .001 |
| Platelets (×109/L) | 190 (13–450) | 353 (180–525) | 0 | 8 | .001 |
| Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | 187 (78.4–620) | 232 (73.4–455) | 1 | 0 | .53 |
| PC activity (%) | 46.5 (15.2–112) | 78 (73–85) | 0 | 5 | .029 |
| AT activity (%) | 71.1 (25–95) | 120 (89–146) | 0 | 9 | .0001 |
| vWF activity (%) | 101 (55.7–145) | 65 (73–109) | 4 | 1 | .0001 |
| D‐dimers (ng/mL) | 219 (54.8–471) | 251 (121–547) | 0 | 1 | .3219 |
P‐value for comparison of hemostatic variables in dogs with acute liver disease and reference range using Mann–Whitney test. Bonferroni adjusted P < .006.
Figure 1Comparison of TEG results in normal dogs (reference) and in dogs with acute liver disease (ALD) or acute liver failure (ALF). * means significantly different than reference value; # indicates significantly different from value in dogs with ALD.
Figure 2Comparison of conventional plasma‐based coagulation testing in normal dogs (reference) and in dogs with acute liver disease (ALD) or acute liver failure (ALF). * means significantly different than reference value; # indicates significantly different from value in dogs with ALD
Figure 3Comparison of TEG variables in normal dogs (reference) and in dogs with (HF) and without (NF) hyperfibrinolysis. * means significantly different than reference value; # indicates significantly different from value in NF dogs
Figure 4Comparison of conventional coagulation testing in normal dogs (reference) and in dogs with (HF) and without (NF) hyperfibrinolysis. * means significantly different than reference value; # indicates significantly different from value in NF dogs.