Literature DB >> 26178730

Eating under observation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect that heightened awareness of observation has on laboratory measured energy intake.

Eric Robinson1, Charlotte A Hardman2, Jason C G Halford2, Andrew Jones2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laboratory paradigms are commonly used to study human energy intake. However, the extent to which participants believe their eating behavior is being measured may affect energy intake and is a methodologic factor that has received little consideration.
OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to examine available evidence for the effect that heightened awareness of observation has on energy intake in a laboratory setting.
DESIGN: We systematically reviewed laboratory studies that allowed for experimental examination of the effect that heightened awareness of observation has on energy intake. From these experimental studies we combined effect estimates using inverse variance meta-analysis, calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) in energy intake between heightened-awareness and control conditions and qualitatively synthesized potential moderators of this effect.
RESULTS: Nine studies, providing 22 comparisons, were eligible for inclusion. These studies largely sampled young women and examined the energy intake of energy-dense snack foods. Evidence indicated that heightened awareness of observation was associated with reduced energy intake when compared with the control condition (random-effects SMD: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.66; P < 0.0001). We found little evidence that the type of experimental manipulation used to heighten awareness moderated the overall effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence to date suggests that heightened awareness of observation reduces energy intake in a laboratory setting. These findings suggest that laboratory studies should attempt to minimize the degree to which participants are aware that their eating behavior is being measured.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  awareness; demand characteristics; eating behavior; energy intake; experimenter effects; laboratory methods; observer effect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26178730     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.111195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  22 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of energy metabolism in humans: A review of methodologies.

Authors:  Yan Y Lam; Eric Ravussin
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 7.422

2.  The ad-libitum alcohol 'taste test': secondary analyses of potential confounds and construct validity.

Authors:  Andrew Jones; Emily Button; Abigail K Rose; Eric Robinson; Paul Christiansen; Lisa Di Lemma; Matt Field
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The "Smart Dining Table": Automatic Behavioral Tracking of a Meal with a Multi-Touch-Computer.

Authors:  Sean Manton; Greta Magerowski; Laura Patriarca; Miguel Alonso-Alonso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11

4.  Evidence for sample selection effect and Hawthorne effect in behavioural HIV prevention trial among young women in a rural South African community.

Authors:  Molly Rosenberg; Audrey Pettifor; Rhian Twine; James P Hughes; F Xavier Gomez-Olive; Ryan G Wagner; Afolabi Sulaimon; Stephen Tollman; Amanda Selin; Catherine MacPhail; Kathleen Kahn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The bogus taste test: Validity as a measure of laboratory food intake.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Eva Kemps; Suzanne Higgs; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Crave, Like, Eat: Determinants of Food Intake in a Sample of Children and Adolescents with a Wide Range in Body Mass.

Authors:  Johannes Hofmann; Adrian Meule; Julia Reichenberger; Daniel Weghuber; Elisabeth Ardelt-Gattinger; Jens Blechert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-21

7.  Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers.

Authors:  David M Troy; Angela S Attwood; Olivia M Maynard; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Matthew Hickman; Theresa M Marteau; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 8.  Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  M Angeles Vargas-Alvarez; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Luigi Palla; J Alfredo Martínez; Eva Almiron-Roig
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  The effect of heightened awareness of observation on consumption of a multi-item laboratory test meal in females.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Michael Proctor; Melissa Oldham; Una Masic
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-29

10.  Methodological and reporting quality in laboratory studies of human eating behavior.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Kirsten E Bevelander; Matt Field; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.