Eric Robinson1, Charlotte A Hardman2, Jason C G Halford2, Andrew Jones2. 1. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom eric.robinson@liv.ac.uk. 2. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laboratory paradigms are commonly used to study human energy intake. However, the extent to which participants believe their eating behavior is being measured may affect energy intake and is a methodologic factor that has received little consideration. OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to examine available evidence for the effect that heightened awareness of observation has on energy intake in a laboratory setting. DESIGN: We systematically reviewed laboratory studies that allowed for experimental examination of the effect that heightened awareness of observation has on energy intake. From these experimental studies we combined effect estimates using inverse variance meta-analysis, calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) in energy intake between heightened-awareness and control conditions and qualitatively synthesized potential moderators of this effect. RESULTS: Nine studies, providing 22 comparisons, were eligible for inclusion. These studies largely sampled young women and examined the energy intake of energy-dense snack foods. Evidence indicated that heightened awareness of observation was associated with reduced energy intake when compared with the control condition (random-effects SMD: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.66; P < 0.0001). We found little evidence that the type of experimental manipulation used to heighten awareness moderated the overall effect. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence to date suggests that heightened awareness of observation reduces energy intake in a laboratory setting. These findings suggest that laboratory studies should attempt to minimize the degree to which participants are aware that their eating behavior is being measured.
BACKGROUND: Laboratory paradigms are commonly used to study human energy intake. However, the extent to which participants believe their eating behavior is being measured may affect energy intake and is a methodologic factor that has received little consideration. OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to examine available evidence for the effect that heightened awareness of observation has on energy intake in a laboratory setting. DESIGN: We systematically reviewed laboratory studies that allowed for experimental examination of the effect that heightened awareness of observation has on energy intake. From these experimental studies we combined effect estimates using inverse variance meta-analysis, calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) in energy intake between heightened-awareness and control conditions and qualitatively synthesized potential moderators of this effect. RESULTS: Nine studies, providing 22 comparisons, were eligible for inclusion. These studies largely sampled young women and examined the energy intake of energy-dense snack foods. Evidence indicated that heightened awareness of observation was associated with reduced energy intake when compared with the control condition (random-effects SMD: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.66; P < 0.0001). We found little evidence that the type of experimental manipulation used to heighten awareness moderated the overall effect. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence to date suggests that heightened awareness of observation reduces energy intake in a laboratory setting. These findings suggest that laboratory studies should attempt to minimize the degree to which participants are aware that their eating behavior is being measured.
Authors: Andrew Jones; Emily Button; Abigail K Rose; Eric Robinson; Paul Christiansen; Lisa Di Lemma; Matt Field Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Molly Rosenberg; Audrey Pettifor; Rhian Twine; James P Hughes; F Xavier Gomez-Olive; Ryan G Wagner; Afolabi Sulaimon; Stephen Tollman; Amanda Selin; Catherine MacPhail; Kathleen Kahn Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Eric Robinson; Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Eva Kemps; Suzanne Higgs; Andrew Jones Journal: Appetite Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Johannes Hofmann; Adrian Meule; Julia Reichenberger; Daniel Weghuber; Elisabeth Ardelt-Gattinger; Jens Blechert Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-09-21
Authors: David M Troy; Angela S Attwood; Olivia M Maynard; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Matthew Hickman; Theresa M Marteau; Marcus R Munafò Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: M Angeles Vargas-Alvarez; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Luigi Palla; J Alfredo Martínez; Eva Almiron-Roig Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 5.717