Literature DB >> 26178330

Patellofemoral Pain in Adolescence and Adulthood: Same Same, but Different?

M S Rathleff1,2, B Vicenzino3, M Middelkoop4, T Graven-Nielsen5, R van Linschoten6, P Hölmich7, K Thorborg7.   

Abstract

The mainstay of patellofemoral pain (PFP) treatment is exercise therapy, often in combination with adjunct treatments such as patient education, orthoses, patella taping and stretching, making the intervention multimodal in nature. The vast majority of randomised controlled trials among patients with PFP have investigated the effect of treatment among adults (>18 years of age). So, while systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide evidence-based recommendations for treating PFP, these recommendations are largely based upon the trials in adults. In the present article, we have summarised the findings on the efficacy of multimodal treatment (predominantly exercise) from the three largest trials concerning patients with PFP, focusing on the long-term success-rate 1 year after receiving multimodal treatment, and with a particular focus on the success rate across the different age groups, including both adolescents, young adults and adults. The results of this paper show that there appears to be a difference in the success rate between adolescents and adults, despite providing similar exercise treatment and having similar exercise compliance. While PFP may present in a similar fashion in adolescence and adults, it may not be the same underlying condition or stage, and different treatments may be required. Collectively, this highlights the importance of increasing our understanding of the underlying pathology, pain mechanisms and why treatment may-or may not-work in adolescents and adults with PFP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26178330     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0364-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  59 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of nonsurgical interventions for anterior knee pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Natalie J Collins; Leanne M Bisset; Kay M Crossley; Bill Vicenzino
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Half of 12-15-year-olds with knee pain still have pain after one year.

Authors:  Camilla Rams Rathleff; Jens Lykkegaard Olesen; Ewa M Roos; Sten Rasmussen; Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.240

3.  Patellofemoral pain: consensus statement from the 3rd International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat held in Vancouver, September 2013.

Authors:  Erik Witvrouw; Michael J Callaghan; Joshua J Stefanik; Brian Noehren; David M Bazett-Jones; John D Willson; Jennifer E Earl-Boehm; Irene S Davis; Christopher M Powers; Jenny McConnell; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Lower mechanical pressure pain thresholds in female adolescents with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Michael S Rathleff; Ewa M Roos; Jens L Olesen; Sten Rasmussen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  What predicts functional outcome after treatment for patellofemoral pain?

Authors:  Els Pattyn; Nele Mahieu; James Selfe; Peter Verdonk; Adelheid Steyaert; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Which factors predict outcome in the nonoperative treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome? A prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  P Kannus; S Niittymäki
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Prognostic factors for patellofemoral pain: a multicentre observational analysis.

Authors:  Natalie J Collins; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Kay M Crossley; Robbart L van Linschoten; Bill Vicenzino; Marienke van Middelkoop
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Prevention of overuse injuries by a concurrent exercise program in subjects exposed to an increase in training load: a randomized controlled trial of 1020 army recruits.

Authors:  Christoffer Brushøj; Klaus Larsen; Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Finn Løye; Per Hölmich
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Which factors predict the long-term outcome in chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome? A 7-yr prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  A Natri; P Kannus; M Järvinen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 10.  Effectiveness of exercise therapy in treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ron Clijsen; Janine Fuchs; Jan Taeymans
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-07-31
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of knee pain in young athletes: overuse injuries of the knee.

Authors:  Dilip R Patel; Ana Villalobos
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-07

2.  Patellofemoral Kinematics and Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distances in Female Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Victor R Carlson; Barry P Boden; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Protocol for a randomised, assessor-blinded, parallel group feasibility trial of flat flexible school shoes for adolescents with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Natalie Mazzella; Aaron Fox; Natalie Saunders; Danielle Trowell; Bill Vicenzino; Jason Bonacci
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Exploring the Pain in Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Signs of Central Sensitization.

Authors:  Kemery J Sigmund; Marie K Hoeger Bement; Jennifer E Earl-Boehm
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.824

5.  2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 2: recommended physical interventions (exercise, taping, bracing, foot orthoses and combined interventions).

Authors:  Kay M Crossley; Marienke van Middelkoop; Michael J Callaghan; Natalie J Collins; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Christian J Barton
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin E Smith; James Selfe; Damian Thacker; Paul Hendrick; Marcus Bateman; Fiona Moffatt; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Toby O Smith; Pip Logan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Adults with patellofemoral pain do not exhibit manifestations of peripheral and central sensitization when compared to healthy pain-free age and sex matched controls - An assessor blinded cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Camilla Rams Rathleff; Aoife Stephenson; Rebecca Mellor; Mark Matthews; Kay Crossley; Bill Vicenzino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Efficacy of live feedback to improve objectively monitored compliance to prescribed, home-based, exercise therapy-dosage in 15 to 19 year old adolescents with patellofemoral pain- a study protocol of a randomized controlled superiority trial (The XRCISE-AS-INSTRUcted-1 trial).

Authors:  Henrik Riel; Mark Matthews; Bill Vicenzino; Thomas Bandholm; Kristian Thorborg; Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Patellofemoral pain during adolescence: much more prevalent than appreciated.

Authors:  M S Rathleff
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 10.  National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Management of Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Lori A Bolgla; Michelle C Boling; Kimberly L Mace; Michael J DiStefano; Donald C Fithian; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.