Literature DB >> 26178204

Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction.

J van Nierop1,2, A Limburg3, C E E van Ofwegen-Hanekamp3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26178204      PMCID: PMC4580664          DOI: 10.1007/s12471-015-0732-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


× No keyword cloud information.
We present a 29-year-old male with fever, acute onset of severe chest pain and short-lasting localised ST elevations on the electrocardiogram (Fig. 1), characteristic for acute myocardial infarction. On echocardiography regional wall motion abnormalities were observed in concordance with the electrocardiogram ST vector. Acute coronary angiography showed normal coronaries. Creatinine kinase-MB and high-sensitive troponin levels were 78 and 1.37 U/l at maximum with a characteristic rise and fall suggesting infarction. We hypothesised coronary artery spasm.
Fig. 1

ECG at presentation with inferior and lateral ST elevations and significant anterior ST depressions

ECG at presentation with inferior and lateral ST elevations and significant anterior ST depressions Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) changed the diagnosis of infarction into myocarditis of the midwall. In retrospect, several clinical features, including leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein, could have led to the diagnosis of myocarditis. Lifelong treatment with cardiac medication was prevented. Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing myocarditis; however due to its invasive approach it is not common practice [1]. CMR is an accepted diagnostic tool. Image analysis is limited by great clinical variance ranging from chest pain to fulminant heart failure [2, 3]. Using T1 and T2 sequences and late gadolineum enhancement, one can differentiate between myocardial infarction and myocarditis [1]. When Lake-Louise criteria are applied, sensitivity and specificity of CMR proved to be high compared to endomyocardial biopsy [1-4]. Viral myocarditis can induce myocardial ischaemia [1, 4]. The exact pathogenesis is unclear. Hypotheses state that ischaemia is a consequence of local endothelial dysfunction, coronary spasms and in situ thrombi formation [4, 5]. Specific epicardial lesions as are shown in Fig. 2 are proof of myocarditis. If no coronary stenosis is seen on CAG, myocarditis may be the cause.
Fig. 2

MR image of the patient. The white arrow (gadolinium contrast) points to subepicardial inflammation of the midwall, the clue to the diagnosis of myocarditis

MR image of the patient. The white arrow (gadolinium contrast) points to subepicardial inflammation of the midwall, the clue to the diagnosis of myocarditis

Conflict of interests

None declared.
  5 in total

1.  Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

Authors:  Alida L P Caforio; Sabine Pankuweit; Eloisa Arbustini; Cristina Basso; Juan Gimeno-Blanes; Stephan B Felix; Michael Fu; Tiina Heliö; Stephane Heymans; Roland Jahns; Karin Klingel; Ales Linhart; Bernhard Maisch; William McKenna; Jens Mogensen; Yigal M Pinto; Arsen Ristic; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Hubert Seggewiss; Luigi Tavazzi; Gaetano Thiene; Ali Yilmaz; Philippe Charron; Perry M Elliott
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches.

Authors:  Hassan Abdel-Aty; Philipp Boyé; Anja Zagrosek; Ralf Wassmuth; Andreas Kumar; Daniel Messroghli; Petra Bock; Rainer Dietz; Matthias G Friedrich; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Myocarditis.

Authors:  Leslie T Cooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Parvovirus B19 infection mimicking acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Uwe Kühl; Matthias Pauschinger; Thomas Bock; Karin Klingel; C Peter Lothar Schwimmbeck; Bettina Seeberg; Lars Krautwurm; Wolfgang Poller; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Reinhard Kandolf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  T(1) mapping for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis using CMR: comparison to T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Vanessa M Ferreira; Stefan K Piechnik; Erica Dall'Armellina; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Jane M Francis; Ntobeko Ntusi; Cameron Holloway; Robin P Choudhury; Attila Kardos; Matthew D Robson; Matthias G Friedrich; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-04
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Infant acute myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Maher Jedidi; Samia Tilouche; Tasnim Masmoudi; Maha Sahnoun; Youssef Chkirbène; Sarra Mestiri; Lamia Boughamoura; Mohamed Ben Dhiab; Mohamed Kamel Souguir
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.