Literature DB >> 26177945

Position Effects in Choice From Simultaneous Displays: A Conundrum Solved.

Maya Bar-Hillel1.   

Abstract

From drop-down computer menus to department-store aisles, people in everyday life often choose from simultaneous displays of products or options. Studies of position effects in such choices show seemingly inconsistent results. For example, in restaurant choice, items enjoy an advantage when placed at the beginning or end of the menu listings, but in multiple-choice tests, answers are more popular when placed in the middle of the offered list. When reaching for a bottle on a supermarket shelf, bottles in the middle of the display are more popular. But on voting ballots, first is the most advantageous position. Some of the effects are quite sensible, whereas others are harder to justify and can aptly be regarded as biases. This article attempts to put position effects into a unified and coherent framework and to account for them simply by using a small number of familiar psychological principles.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  edge aversion; interactive choice; middle bias; primacy; reachability; representativeness; salience; serial position effect; strategic choice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26177945     DOI: 10.1177/1745691615588092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  11 in total

1.  Nudging Healthy Choices in Food Search Through Visual Attractiveness.

Authors:  Alain D Starke; Martijn C Willemsen; Christoph Trattner
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-04-22

2.  Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will.

Authors:  Alice Pailhès; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-14

3.  Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Patrice Carter; Sumayya Anwer; Sarah E King; Susan A Jebb; David Ogilvie; Ian Shemilt; Julian P T Higgins; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-04

4.  Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Patrice Carter; Sumayya Anwer; Sarah E King; Susan A Jebb; David Ogilvie; Ian Shemilt; Julian P T Higgins; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-27

5.  A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.

Authors:  Esther Ulitzsch; Steffi Pohl; Lale Khorramdel; Ulf Kroehne; Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.290

6.  Reachability Does Not Explain the Middle Preference: A Comment on Bar-Hillel (2015).

Authors:  Paul Rodway; Astrid Schepman; Volker Thoma
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 7.  Is Beauty in the Hand of the Writer? Influences of Aesthetic Preferences through Script Directions, Cultural, and Neurological Factors: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Alexander G Page; Chris McManus; Carmen P González; Sobh Chahboun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-03

8.  Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Fabia Rothenfluh; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Line-Up Image Position in Simultaneous and Sequential Line-Ups: The Effects of Age and Viewing Distance on Selection Patterns.

Authors:  Thomas J Nyman; Jan Antfolk; James Michael Lampinen; Julia Korkman; Pekka Santtila
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.