Literature DB >> 26177895

Retention of neophobic predator recognition in juvenile convict cichlids: effects of background risk and recent experience.

Grant E Brown1, Ebony E Demers2, Brendan J Joyce2, Maud C O Ferrari3, Douglas P Chivers4.   

Abstract

Exposure to conditions of elevated predation risk, even for relatively short periods, has been shown to induce neophobic responses to novel predators. Such phenotypically plastic responses should allow prey to exhibit costly anti-predator behaviour to novel cues only in situations where the risk of predation is high. While there is evidence that the level of background risk shapes the strength of induced neophobia, we know little about how long neophobic responses are retained. Here we exposed juvenile convict cichlids (Amatitlania nigrofasciata) to three background levels of short-term background risk and then tested their responses to novel predator odours. Cichlids exposed to low risk did not show neophobic responses, while those exposed to intermediate and high risk did. Using extinction trials, we demonstrate that the retention of neophobic responses is greater among cichlids exposed to high versus intermediate predation risk conditions. Moreover, we found much longer retention of the neophobic responses when cichlids were tested a single time compared to when they were tested repeatedly in the extinction trials. This work supports the prediction that neophobic responses to specific odours are relatively long lasting but can quickly wane if the cues are experienced repeatedly without them being associated with risk. It is clear that background level of risk and the frequency of exposure to novel cues are crucial factors in determining the retention of risk-related information among prey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antipredator behaviour; Behavioural decisions; Behavioural plasticity; Neophobia; Predation threats; Predator recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26177895     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0902-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  6 in total

Review 1.  Patterns of predator neophobia: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Adam L Crane; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The legacy of predator threat shapes prey foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Simone Des Roches; Rebecca R Robinson; Michael T Kinnison; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Disturbance cues function as a background risk cue but not as an associative learning cue in tadpoles.

Authors:  Ita A E Rivera-Hernández; Adam L Crane; Michael S Pollock; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.899

4.  Local predation risk shapes spatial and foraging neophobia patterns in Trinidadian guppies.

Authors:  Chris K Elvidge; Pierre J C Chuard; Grant E Brown
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Disturbance cue communication is shaped by emitter diet and receiver background risk in Trinidadian guppies.

Authors:  Jack A Goldman; Adam L Crane; Laurence E A Feyten; Emily Collins; Grant E Brown
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.734

6.  The propensity for re-triggered predation fear in a prey fish.

Authors:  Adam L Crane; Laurence E A Feyten; Indar W Ramnarine; Grant E Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.