Daniel S Brown1, Ira H Bernstein2, Shawn M McClintock1,3, C Munro Cullum1,4, Richard B Dewey4, Mustafa Husain4,5,6, Laura H Lacritz1,4. 1. Division of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 2. Department of Clinical Science, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 3. Division of Brain Stimulation and Neurophysiology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Department of Neurology & Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a brief cognitive screening measure previously validated for use in Parkinson's disease (PD), and Alzheimer's Disease-8 (AD8), an eight-item informant report used to screen for dementia, but not yet validated for use in PD, to identify cognitive impairment in a sample of 111 patients with PD. METHODS: Cognitive impairment was determined based on a battery of neuropsychological measures, excluding the MoCA and AD8. Classification rates of both the MoCA and AD8 in identifying cognitive impairment were examined using logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Optimal cutoff scores were determined to maximize sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The MoCA correctly classified 78.4% of participants (p < 0.001), and ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. A MoCA cutoff score of <25 yielded optimal sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.79) for identifying PD patients with cognitive impairment. Similar analyses for the AD8 were statistically nonsignificant, although the classification rate was 70.5%, with an AUC of 0.50. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide additional support for the MoCA, but not the AD8, in identifying cognitive impairment in patients with PD.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a brief cognitive screening measure previously validated for use in Parkinson's disease (PD), and Alzheimer's Disease-8 (AD8), an eight-item informant report used to screen for dementia, but not yet validated for use in PD, to identify cognitive impairment in a sample of 111 patients with PD. METHODS:Cognitive impairment was determined based on a battery of neuropsychological measures, excluding the MoCA and AD8. Classification rates of both the MoCA and AD8 in identifying cognitive impairment were examined using logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Optimal cutoff scores were determined to maximize sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The MoCA correctly classified 78.4% of participants (p < 0.001), and ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. A MoCA cutoff score of <25 yielded optimal sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.79) for identifying PDpatients with cognitive impairment. Similar analyses for the AD8 were statistically nonsignificant, although the classification rate was 70.5%, with an AUC of 0.50. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide additional support for the MoCA, but not the AD8, in identifying cognitive impairment in patients with PD.
Authors: Kelvin L Chou; Melissa M Amick; Jason Brandt; Richard Camicioli; Karen Frei; Darren Gitelman; Jennifer Goldman; John Growdon; Howard I Hurtig; Bonnie Levin; Irene Litvan; Laura Marsh; Tanya Simuni; Alexander I Tröster; Ergun Y Uc Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: D Aarsland; K Bronnick; C Williams-Gray; D Weintraub; K Marder; J Kulisevsky; D Burn; P Barone; J Pagonabarraga; L Allcock; G Santangelo; T Foltynie; C Janvin; J P Larsen; R A Barker; M Emre Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sarra Nazem; Andrew D Siderowf; John E Duda; Tom Ten Have; Amy Colcher; Stacy S Horn; Paul J Moberg; Jayne R Wilkinson; Howard I Hurtig; Matthew B Stern; Daniel Weintraub Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Edgar Turner Overton; Tej D Azad; Neva Parker; Debra Demarco Shaw; Judy Frain; Teresa Spitz; Elizabeth Westerhaus; Robert Paul; David B Clifford; Beau M Ances Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Bruno Dubois; David Burn; Christopher Goetz; Dag Aarsland; Richard G Brown; Gerald A Broe; Dennis Dickson; Charles Duyckaerts; Jefferey Cummings; Serge Gauthier; Amos Korczyn; Andrew Lees; Richard Levy; Irene Litvan; Yoshikuni Mizuno; Ian G McKeith; C Warren Olanow; Werner Poewe; Cristina Sampaio; Eduardo Tolosa; Murat Emre Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Cindy Zadikoff; Susan H Fox; David F Tang-Wai; Teri Thomsen; Rob M A de Bie; Pettarusup Wadia; Janis Miyasaki; Sarah Duff-Canning; Anthony E Lang; Connie Marras Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Christopher G Goetz; Barbara C Tilley; Stephanie R Shaftman; Glenn T Stebbins; Stanley Fahn; Pablo Martinez-Martin; Werner Poewe; Cristina Sampaio; Matthew B Stern; Richard Dodel; Bruno Dubois; Robert Holloway; Joseph Jankovic; Jaime Kulisevsky; Anthony E Lang; Andrew Lees; Sue Leurgans; Peter A LeWitt; David Nyenhuis; C Warren Olanow; Olivier Rascol; Anette Schrag; Jeanne A Teresi; Jacobus J van Hilten; Nancy LaPelle Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Erika A Pugh; Emily C Kemp; Christopher H van Dyck; Adam P Mecca; Emily S Sharp Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Kelson James Almeida; Larissa Clementino Leite de Sá Carvalho; Tomásia Henrique Oliveira de Holanda Monteiro; Paulo Cesar de Jesus Gonçalves; Raimundo Nonato Campos-Sousa Journal: Dement Neuropsychol Date: 2019 Apr-Jun