Literature DB >> 26177235

Magnetic stimulation and movement-related cortical activity for acute stroke with hemiparesis.

A Matsuura1,2, K Onoda1, H Oguro1, S Yamaguchi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated the beneficial effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to patients with motor paresis in acute subcortical stroke on functional recovery and electrophysiological measures.
METHODS: Twenty patients with acute stroke were randomized into real rTMS (n = 10) or sham (n = 10) groups. Patients received five daily sessions of rTMS with 1200 pulses at 1 Hz for 20 min or sham stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex. Movement-related cortical potential MRCP, consisting of the Bereitschaftpotential, negative slope (NS') and motor potential (MP), was recorded during self-paced wrist extension of the affected limb associated with assessment of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) of the upper extremity, the pegboard test and the grip strength before and after the rTMS session.
RESULTS: Real rTMS improved the FMA and pegboard test scores compared to the sham group in the affected hand. This improvement was associated with increases in the MP and NS' over the front-central sites in the ipsilesional hemisphere, whereas the sham group did not show significant changes in MRCP components by rTMS.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional motor cortex facilitates functional recovery of paretic limbs in acute stroke patients through enhancing the the neuronal activity of ipsilesional motor and pre-motor areas.
© 2015 EAN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute stroke; motor recovery; movement-related cortical potential; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26177235     DOI: 10.1111/ene.12776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Brain stimulation for treating stroke-related motor deficits].

Authors:  Caroline Tscherpel; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Obstacle avoidance movement-related motor cortical activity with cognitive task.

Authors:  Akihiro Matsuura; Natsumi Sai; Ayaka Yamaoka; Tetsuya Karita; Futoshi Mori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Skeletal Muscle Changes in the First Three Months of Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Beckwée; Lotte Cuypers; Nina Lefeber; Emma De Keersmaecker; Ellen Scheys; Wout Van Hees; Stany Perkisas; Sylvie De Raedt; Eric Kerckhofs; Ivan Bautmans; Eva Swinnen
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Correlation between changes of contralesional cortical activity and motor function recovery in patients with hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  Akihiro Matsuura; Tetsuya Karita; Nao Nakada; Suguru Fukushima; Futoshi Mori
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2017-10-30

5.  Placebo effect of rTMS on post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Ting Pu; Zhiwei Guo; Binghu Jiang; Qiwen Mu
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.396

6.  Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lan Zhang; Guoqiang Xing; Shiquan Shuai; Zhiwei Guo; Huaping Chen; Morgan A McClure; Xiaojuan Chen; Qiwen Mu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Timing of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Onset for Upper Limb Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eline C C van Lieshout; H Bart van der Worp; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Rick M Dijkhuizen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Dosing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortices With Multi-Scale Modeling.

Authors:  Zsolt Turi; Nicholas Hananeia; Sina Shirinpour; Alexander Opitz; Peter Jedlicka; Andreas Vlachos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 9.  Role of the Contralesional vs. Ipsilesional Hemisphere in Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Keith C Dodd; Veena A Nair; Vivek Prabhakaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Brain Functional Changes in Stroke Following Rehabilitation Using Brain-Computer Interface-Assisted Motor Imagery With and Without tDCS: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mengjiao Hu; Hsiao-Ju Cheng; Fang Ji; Joanna Su Xian Chong; Zhongkang Lu; Weimin Huang; Kai Keng Ang; Kok Soon Phua; Kai-Hsiang Chuang; Xudong Jiang; Effie Chew; Cuntai Guan; Juan Helen Zhou
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.