Literature DB >> 2617708

An attempt to increase compliance to cervical cancer screening through general practitioners.

S Cecchini1, G Grazzini, D Bartoli, I Falvo, S Ciatto.   

Abstract

The authors report the results of a campaign aimed at increasing compliance to cervical cancer screening by promoting general practitioners' (GPs) cooperation. Different types of intervention were tested, namely mailing lists of non responders to the GP, visiting the GP at the office, or both. No active intervention was made in a sample of GPs who served as a control group. Overall 288 GPs assisting 75,853 women aged 25 to 59 were enrolled in the study. Compliance before and after the campaign was studied and the association between compliance and different variables such as age, residence and type of intervention was tested by univariate and multivariate analysis. The proportion of previous non responders who performed a Pap test after the campaign was 6.7%, the response being dependent on age (25-29 = 11.5%, 30-39 = 8.8%, 40-49 = 6.5%, 50-59 = 4.2%) and place of residence (urban = 7.2%, suburban = 5.9%, rural = 4.0%). Compliance was better in the case of the active campaign (list mailing = 8.3%, visit = 7.0%, list + visit = 7.2%) with respect to controls (2.9%) although no significant differences were detected between different types of active intervention. Compliance to cervical cancer screening may be increased by promoting GPs cooperation but the benefit is limited. Mailing lists of non responders was found the most cost effective policy in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2617708     DOI: 10.1177/030089168907500621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Barriers to preventive care in general practice: the role of organizational and attitudinal factors.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; B B van Drenth; H G Mokkink; J C van der Wouden; R P Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Cervical cancer: screening hard-to-reach groups.

Authors:  E Grunfeld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

Review 5.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.