| Literature DB >> 26176755 |
Deping Han1, Tangting Wei1, Siyi Zhang1, Ming Wang1,2, Haiyan Tian1, Jinlong Cheng1, Jin Xiao2, Yanxin Hu1, Mingyong Chen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify the protective role of sodium cromoglycate in mice during influenza virus infection.Entities:
Keywords: influenza A virus; sodium cromoglycate; therapeutic effects
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26176755 PMCID: PMC4687497 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses ISSN: 1750-2640 Impact factor: 4.380
Protocols used for pre‐test and formal test
| Test | Group | Treatment protocols | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre‐test | PBS | PBS: 50 μl intranasally as a control twice daily for 7 days after infection | All mice were anesthetized using Zoletil before intranasal administration |
| SCG | Low dose: 10 μl (10 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection | ||
| Moderate dose: 25 μl (25 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection | |||
| High dose: 50 μl (50 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection | |||
| Formal test | PBS+virus | PBS: 50 μl as a control twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection | |
| SCG+virus | SCG: 25 μl (25 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection | ||
| Oseltamivir+virus | Oseltamivir: 200 μg in 200 μl (10 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intragastrically after infection | ||
The primers used to detect the gene expressions in the lungs
| Cytokines | Primers | |
|---|---|---|
| TNF‐α | Forward | 5′‐CTGTAGCCCACGTCGTAGC‐3′ |
| Reverse | 5′‐TTGAGATCCATGCCGTTG‐3′ | |
| IL‐6 | Forward | 5′‐AGCCAGAGTCCTTCA‐3′ |
| Reverse | 5′‐TCTTGGTCCTTAGCC‐3′ | |
| IFN‐γ | Forward | 5′‐ACACTGCATCTTGGCTTTGCAGCT‐3′ |
| Reverse | 5′‐TGAGCTCATTGCATGCTTGGCGCT‐3′ | |
| TLR3 | Forward | 5′‐CCCTTCACCTTTCCG‐3′ |
| Reverse | 5′‐TCATCTAAGCCGTTGG‐3′ | |
| TRIF | Forward | 5′‐AACCTCCACATCCCCTGTTTT‐3′ |
| Reverse | 5′‐CGGGCACCTGAAATTCCTCA‐3′ | |
| β‐Actin | Forward | 5′‐GAGACCTTCAACACCCCGC‐3′ |
| Reverse | 5′‐ATGTCACGCACGATTTCCC‐3′ | |
Figure 1The therapeutic effects of SCG on H5N1 virus infection in mice. (A) The survival rates of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with different doses of SCG (n = 10). (B) The clinical symptoms of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with oseltamivir or SCG 24 h post‐infection. (C) The scores of clinical changes in H5N1‐infected mice after treatment. (D) The survival rates of H5N1‐infected mice after different treatments (n = 10). (E) The changes of body weight in treated mice after H5N1 infection.
Figure 2Viral loads in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with oseltamivir or SCG. (A and B) Viral loads in the lungs at the indicated days post‐infection (n = 3 per group) were estimated using real‐time PCR (A) or plaque assays (B). The data shown are representative results from three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences between the control and treated groups are indicated by ** (P < 0·01). (C) The distribution of anti‐influenza virus nucleoprotein antibodies in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice after the indicated treatments on day 5 post‐infection, as determined using immunohistochemistry. Open arrow indicates the positive cells.
Figure 3Pathological changes in the respiratory tissues of mice from the different groups. (A) On day 5 post‐infection, severe dropout of epithelial cells, inflammatory cellular infiltration (black arrow), and hemorrhage and edema (open arrow) were observed in the in trachea and lungs of virus‐infected mice (a–c). No obvious injury was observed in oseltamivir‐treated mice post‐infection (d‐f). Mild cell debris, inflammatory cells (black arrow), and hemorrhage (open arrow) were observed in SCG‐treated mice post‐infection (g‐i). (B) The scores of pathological changes in H5N1‐infected mice on days 3 and 5 after treatment.
Figure 4The expression of ,α, γ, , and in the lungs of mice in the different treatment groups on days 3 and 5 post‐infection was determined using real‐time PCR. The results are presented as means ± SDs of triplicate samples from three independent experiments. * P < 0·05 and ** P < 0·01 compared with PBS group after infection; # P < 0·05 and # P < 0·01 compared with SCG group after infection.