Literature DB >> 26176755

The therapeutic effects of sodium cromoglycate against influenza A virus H5N1 in mice.

Deping Han1, Tangting Wei1, Siyi Zhang1, Ming Wang1,2, Haiyan Tian1, Jinlong Cheng1, Jin Xiao2, Yanxin Hu1, Mingyong Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the protective role of sodium cromoglycate in mice during influenza virus infection.
DESIGN: H5N1 virus-infected mice were treated with the mast cell stabilizer sodium cromoglycate (SCG) to investigate its therapeutic effect. SAMPLE: The nose, trachea and lungs from mice were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Virus replication and host responses were determined by plaque assay, quantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry, and histology.
RESULTS: SCG-treated mice survived better than did PBS-treated mice after H5N1 virus infection. Mild pathological changes with fewer inflammatory cell infiltration and fewer virus antigens were observed in the nose, trachea, and lungs of SCG-treated mice on days 3 and 5 post-infection. However, no significant changes in viral load in the lungs were detected between SCG- and PBS-treated mice. Furthermore, significantly decreased expression of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-a, Toll-like receptor 3, and TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-b was detected in the lungs of SCG-treated mice, and no higher expression of interferon-c was detected.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SCG has therapeutic roles in H5N1 virus-infected mice by alleviating the inflammatory response rather than inhibition of viral replication in the lungs.
© 2015 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  influenza A virus; sodium cromoglycate; therapeutic effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26176755      PMCID: PMC4687497          DOI: 10.1111/irv.12334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses        ISSN: 1750-2640            Impact factor:   4.380


Introduction

Owing to its rapid spread and high pathogenicity, avian influenza virus (AIV) H5N1 has caused severe problems in domestic poultry and humans worldwide. Since the first case of a human infected with highly pathogenic AIV (HPAIV) was reported in Hong Kong in 1997, this has been followed by an outbreak of HPAIV in China in 2004; therefore, AIV has gained significant attention.1, 2, 3 The uncontrolled virus‐induced “cytokine storm” and virus replication in both poultry and humans after HPAIV infection were the main contribution to the acute lung injury and mortality in both humans and animals.4, 5, 6 Studies have shown that the “cytokine storm” produced by the overreacting immune system was responsible for the pathogenesis of H5N1 influenza.7 During a cytokine storm in which there is the dysregulation of cytokines, their effects might become excessive and harmful.8 The use of anti‐inflammatory doses of corticosteroids to control excessive inflammation might not improve the survival rate of H5N1‐infected mice because of severe side effects.9 Furthermore, cytokine and chemokine knockout mice or steroid‐treated wild‐type mice did not have a survival advantage over wild‐type mice following viral challenge.10 Mast cells are distributed widely in all tissues throughout the body and are best known for their potent effector functions in allergic diseases.11 The involvement of mast cells in tumors and parasitic, bacterial, and viral infections has also attracted widespread attention.12, 13 Many studies have shown that mast cells play a crucial role in the process of some viral infections, such as dengue virus, human immunodeficiency virus, Newcastle disease virus, and infectious bursal disease virus, by producing many inflammatory molecules including potent proteases, cytokines, chemokines, and arachidonic acid metabolites.14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Our previous study revealed that mast cells play roles in the pathogenesis of lung injury after H5N1 virus infection by producing proinflammatory mediators including tryptase, histamine, and interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ). In addition, the resulting lung injury was improved by treatment with ketotifen, which inhibits mast cell activation.19 Sodium cromoglycate (SCG) can inhibit degranulation and the release of histamine and inflammatory mediators from mast cells. It is used to treat allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, small intestine ischemia/reperfusion, allergic conjunctivitis, and contact dermatitis;20, 21, 22, 23, 24 however, its role in the pathogenesis of H5N1 virus infection is unclear. In this study, we investigated whether SCG has protective effects during the initial process of influenza virus infection and the possible mechanism behind any such effects. We show that SCG can improve the mouse survival and respiratory pathological changes. Although viral replication was not inhibited, SCG could regulate the expressions of IL‐6, TNF‐α, TLR3, and TRIF to alleviate the pathological injury to the nose, trachea, and lungs by reducing the inflammatory response.

Methods

Animals and cells

Female BALB/c mice aged 6–8 weeks were purchased from Vital River Laboratories (Beijing, China), and the original breeding pairs were from Charles River Laboratories. The mice were housed in independent ventilated cages, and received pathogen‐free food and water. Animal experiments were controlled by the Regulations of Experimental Animals of Beijing Authority and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the China Agricultural University. Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line was provided by the Cell Resource Center of Peking Union Medical College. They were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (DMEM; HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin.

Chemicals

Sodium cromoglycate nasal spray (Vividrin) was purchased from Bausch & Lomb (Germany); 1 ml spray contained 20 mg SCG. Oseltamivir phosphate (Tamiflu; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was dissolved in 0·85% saline and administered to the mice at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight, as described previously.19

Virus and challenge

The H5N1 influenza virus (A/chicken/Henan/1/2004, clade 2) used in this study was isolated from infected chicken flocks. This strain has six consecutive basic amino acids at the hemagglutinin (HA) cleavage site, and the receptor binding sites are exactly the same as those in A/Hong Kong/156/97 (H5N1). The virus was isolated from Henan Province, China. The virus was propagated in MDCK cells at 37°C for 48 h, and the viral supernatant was harvested, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C. The 50% lethal dose (LD50) was determined in mice after serial dilution of the stock in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). The mice were anesthetized with Zoletil (Virbac, Carros, France) and infected with 3 LD50 in 50 μl intranasally. The body weights of the challenged mice were recorded daily, and the survival rates of the infected and treated mice were calculated on days 3 and 5 post‐infection (pi). Visual grading of clinical changes was performed on days 3 and 5 pi. The standards are as follows: 0, no significant changes; 1–2, inactivity and inappetence; 3–4, inactivity, ruffled hair, inappetence, and emaciation; 5–6; inactivity, ruffled hair, inappetence, emaciation, and labored respiration.

Treatment trial

The BALB/c mice were selected and divided into the PBS‐, SCG‐, or oseltamivir‐treated groups after infection, eight mice in each group. The survival rate and clinical changes were observed and calculated daily after inoculation. Before the formal test, pre‐tests were performed to verify the optimal dose of SCG that had a therapeutic effect in H5N1 virus‐infected mice. SCG was administered intranasally to anaesthetized mice at a dose of 10, 25, or 50 mg/kg body weight, starting immediately post‐viral challenge, 10 mice in each dose group. The details of the pre‐test and formal test are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Protocols used for pre‐test and formal test

TestGroupTreatment protocols
Pre‐testPBSPBS: 50 μl intranasally as a control twice daily for 7 days after infectionAll mice were anesthetized using Zoletil before intranasal administration
SCGLow dose: 10 μl (10 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection
Moderate dose: 25 μl (25 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection
High dose: 50 μl (50 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection
Formal testPBS+virusPBS: 50 μl as a control twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection
SCG+virusSCG: 25 μl (25 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intranasally after infection
Oseltamivir+virusOseltamivir: 200 μg in 200 μl (10 mg/kg) twice daily for 7 days intragastrically after infection
Protocols used for pre‐test and formal test

Plaque assay

Madin–Darby canine kidney cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (HyClone Laboratories, UT, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Right lung homogenates from individual mice were prepared and diluted 10‐fold in DMEM and added to a monolayer of MDCK cells in semisolid agar containing 0·5‐μg/ml trypsin‐tolylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) (Sigma, Beijing, China). Cultures were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 60–72 h, fixed, and stained with 1% crystal violet. The plaque‐forming unit (PFU) was then counted.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

The right lungs, nose, and trachea were removed from euthanized mice and fixed in 4% neutral formalin at room temperature for 48 h. Serial tissue sections 5 μm thick were obtained after embedding in paraffin. Each slide was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Pathological changes were observed and scored under an Olympus microscope (Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.). Criteria for grading changes were previously reported25 with some modifications: grade 0 = no obvious pathological changes; grades 1–3 = inflammatory cell infiltration, hemorrhage, cell shedding; grades 4–5 = inflammatory cell infiltration, hemorrhage, vasculitis or bronchiolitis, and cell apoptosis and necrosis; grades 6–10 = severe inflammatory cell infiltration, severe hemorrhage, vasculitis or bronchiolitis, obvious edema, cell apoptosis and necrosis, and microthrombosis. Tissues sections were stained as described previously26 using an anti‐influenza virus nucleoprotein monoclonal antibody (mAb; AA5H; Abcam, Hong Kong, China) at a 1:1000 dilution. Sections were examined by light microscopy (BX41; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Viral RNA determination by real‐time PCR

Total RNA was prepared from 10 mg tissue from left lungs homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, UT, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNase I‐treated RNA (0·2 μg) was reverse‐transcribed into cDNA using random or universal primers for influenza A virus (Uni12).27 Real‐time PCR was performed to amplify the HA gene of H5N1 influenza virus using the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix Kit (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) and the following primers: forward, 5′‐CGCAGTATTCAGAAGAAGCAAGAC‐3′; and reverse, 5′‐TCCATAAGGATAGACCAGCTACCA‐3′. The reaction was run on an ABI 7500 with the following steps: 95°C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s. Data analyses were performed using the 7500 software (version 2.0; ABI) supplied with the instrument. The copy number of the HA gene was calculated using an HA‐containing plasmid of known concentration as a standard.

Gene expression

Total RNA was prepared previously, and the RNA was purified using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, USA). The RNA quality and purity were determined by NanoDrop ND‐1000 spectrophotometer at 260/280 nm (NanoDrop Technologies, USA). A total of 0·5 μg of total RNA was transcribed into cDNA with the PrimerScript RT reagent Kit (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The expression of tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), IFN‐γ, Toll‐like receptor 3 (TLR3), TIR‐domain‐containing adapter‐inducing interferon‐β (TRIF), and β‐actin was detected by real‐time quantitative PCR. The real‐time PCR primers used to amplify TNF‐α, IL‐6, IFN‐γ, TLR3, TRIF, and β‐actin are listed in Table 2. The reactions were carried out with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s. Gene expression was normalized to that of the control group using the method with β‐actin as the internal standard.
Table 2

The primers used to detect the gene expressions in the lungs

CytokinesPrimers
TNF‐αForward5′‐CTGTAGCCCACGTCGTAGC‐3′
Reverse5′‐TTGAGATCCATGCCGTTG‐3′
IL‐6Forward5′‐AGCCAGAGTCCTTCA‐3′
Reverse5′‐TCTTGGTCCTTAGCC‐3′
IFN‐γForward5′‐ACACTGCATCTTGGCTTTGCAGCT‐3′
Reverse5′‐TGAGCTCATTGCATGCTTGGCGCT‐3′
TLR3Forward5′‐CCCTTCACCTTTCCG‐3′
Reverse5′‐TCATCTAAGCCGTTGG‐3′
TRIFForward5′‐AACCTCCACATCCCCTGTTTT‐3′
Reverse5′‐CGGGCACCTGAAATTCCTCA‐3′
β‐ActinForward5′‐GAGACCTTCAACACCCCGC‐3′
Reverse5′‐ATGTCACGCACGATTTCCC‐3′
The primers used to detect the gene expressions in the lungs

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means ± standard error (SE). The significance of the variability between different groups was determined by two‐way tests of variance using the graphpad prism software (version 5.0). P values < 0·05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The protective effect of SCG in H5N1‐infected mice

To investigate the protective effect of SCG in H5N1‐infected mice, the survival rate, body weight, and clinical signs were recorded. As shown in Figure 1A, 25 mg/kg was the most efficient dose against H5N1 virus (25% survival rate on 240 h pi [hpi]), whereas 10 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg yielded 0·0% survival on 204 and 120 hpi, respectively. Based on the dose–response data described above, we selected the 25 mg/kg dose of SCG for subsequent experiments. PBS‐treated mice presented with clinical signs of inactivity, ruffled hair, inappetence, emaciation, and labored respiration from 24 hpi; however, the mice treated with oseltamivir or SCG showed no obvious clinical signs (Figure 1B). Visual grading of clinical changes was performed (Figure 1C). Compared with the mice in PBS group, mild clinical changes were observed in the mice after SCG and oseltamivir treatment. Unlike the 0·0% survival observed on 144 hpi in PBS‐treated mice, the survival rates of the SCG‐ and oseltamivir‐treated mice were 15% and 22% on 240 hpi (Figure 1D), respectively. No significant differences in body weight were observed between PBS‐, SCG‐, and oseltamivir‐treated mice (Figure 1E). These results suggest that SCG treatment could improve the clinical symptoms and survival of H5N1‐infected mice.
Figure 1

The therapeutic effects of SCG on H5N1 virus infection in mice. (A) The survival rates of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with different doses of SCG (n = 10). (B) The clinical symptoms of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with oseltamivir or SCG 24 h post‐infection. (C) The scores of clinical changes in H5N1‐infected mice after treatment. (D) The survival rates of H5N1‐infected mice after different treatments (n = 10). (E) The changes of body weight in treated mice after H5N1 infection.

The therapeutic effects of SCG on H5N1 virus infection in mice. (A) The survival rates of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with different doses of SCG (n = 10). (B) The clinical symptoms of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with oseltamivir or SCG 24 h post‐infection. (C) The scores of clinical changes in H5N1‐infected mice after treatment. (D) The survival rates of H5N1‐infected mice after different treatments (n = 10). (E) The changes of body weight in treated mice after H5N1 infection.

Virus replication in the lungs

To further determine the protective effects of SCG in H5N1‐infected mice, we examined viral replication in the lungs of infected mice. Plaque assays were performed to assess the presence of viral particles in the lung homogenates. On day 3 pi, obvious PFU were present, but there was no difference between homogenates from control mice, infected mice, and SCG‐treated mice. However, significant differences were detected in oseltamivir‐treated mice. Similarly, no significant difference was seen in infected control and SCG‐treated mice on day 5 pi, whereas significantly fewer PFU were present in oseltamivir‐treated mice (P < 0·01) (Figure 2A).
Figure 2

Viral loads in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with oseltamivir or SCG. (A and B) Viral loads in the lungs at the indicated days post‐infection (n = 3 per group) were estimated using real‐time PCR (A) or plaque assays (B). The data shown are representative results from three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences between the control and treated groups are indicated by ** (P < 0·01). (C) The distribution of anti‐influenza virus nucleoprotein antibodies in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice after the indicated treatments on day 5 post‐infection, as determined using immunohistochemistry. Open arrow indicates the positive cells.

Viral loads in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice after treatment with oseltamivir or SCG. (A and B) Viral loads in the lungs at the indicated days post‐infection (n = 3 per group) were estimated using real‐time PCR (A) or plaque assays (B). The data shown are representative results from three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences between the control and treated groups are indicated by ** (P < 0·01). (C) The distribution of anti‐influenza virus nucleoprotein antibodies in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice after the indicated treatments on day 5 post‐infection, as determined using immunohistochemistry. Open arrow indicates the positive cells. The copy numbers of the hemagglutinin gene were determined using real‐time quantitative PCR to assess viral replication in the lungs. As shown in Figure 2B, no difference was observed between infected control and SCG‐treated mice on days 3 and 5 pi. However, significantly fewer copy numbers were detected in oseltamivir‐treated mice compared with both SCG‐treated and control mice (P < 0·01). After infection, a large number of influenza virus N protein‐positive cells were detected in mucosa epithelial cells, alveolar epithelial cells, lamina propria of the trachea, and inflammatory lymphocytes in H5N1‐infected mice. Although fewer positive cells were observed in the same tissues of SCG‐treated mice, positive cells in the lungs of oseltamivir‐treated mice were only observed in mucosa and alveolar epithelial cells (Figure 2C). These results suggest that SCG treatment did not significantly reduce the viral titer in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice.

Pathological changes

H5N1‐HPAIV infection can lead to severe lung lesions with the histopathological features of progressive pneumonia. To determine whether the degree of histopathological changes could be improved by SCG treatment, the lungs of mice in each group were examined on days 3 and 5 pi. On day 3 pi, hyperemia and hemorrhage in the trachea and lungs, a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration into the nose and trachea, peribronchiolitis, and desquamation of the bronchia epithelial cells were observed in virus‐infected mice. In SCG‐treated mice, no obvious lesions were visible in the nose; there were mild hemorrhage in the submucosa of the trachea, and hyperemia and hemorrhage in the lungs with a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration. No significant pathological changes were observed in oseltamivir‐treated mice, with only mild hyperemia and hemorrhage in the lungs. On day 5 pi, severe pathological changes were observed in virus‐infected mice, which presented as a large number of inflammatory cells and epithelial exfoliation in the nose, hemorrhage, edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration in the lamina propria of the trachea, massive hemorrhage, several erythrocytes, and inflammatory cells in alveolar cavity, and necrosis and falloff of the bronchia epithelial cells with significant inflammatory cell infiltration (Figure 3A). In contrast, lesser lesions were observed in SCG‐treated mice, which exhibited a small number of inflammatory cells in the nose, hyperemia and hemorrhage in the outer membrane of the trachea and lungs, and a widened gap around the bronchia that was infiltrated with edema fluid and inflammatory cells (Figure 3A). In oseltamivir‐treated mice, there were no obvious lesions in the nose, a small number of necrotic epithelial cells, edema, a small number of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria of the trachea, mild hemorrhage, and necrotic epithelial cells in the bronchia in the lungs (Figure 3A). No obvious pathological changes were observed in only PBS‐ or SCG‐treated mice without H5N1 infection. After visual grading of pathological changes, the SCG could alleviate the pathological score compared with PBS‐treated mice after H5N1 infection (Figure 3B). These results suggest that SCG treatment could significantly reduce the inflammatory response and lesions in the nose, trachea, and lungs of H5N1‐infected mice. Therefore, it has the potential to improve the clinical outcome of H5N1 infection.
Figure 3

Pathological changes in the respiratory tissues of mice from the different groups. (A) On day 5 post‐infection, severe dropout of epithelial cells, inflammatory cellular infiltration (black arrow), and hemorrhage and edema (open arrow) were observed in the in trachea and lungs of virus‐infected mice (a–c). No obvious injury was observed in oseltamivir‐treated mice post‐infection (d‐f). Mild cell debris, inflammatory cells (black arrow), and hemorrhage (open arrow) were observed in SCG‐treated mice post‐infection (g‐i). (B) The scores of pathological changes in H5N1‐infected mice on days 3 and 5 after treatment.

Pathological changes in the respiratory tissues of mice from the different groups. (A) On day 5 post‐infection, severe dropout of epithelial cells, inflammatory cellular infiltration (black arrow), and hemorrhage and edema (open arrow) were observed in the in trachea and lungs of virus‐infected mice (a–c). No obvious injury was observed in oseltamivir‐treated mice post‐infection (d‐f). Mild cell debris, inflammatory cells (black arrow), and hemorrhage (open arrow) were observed in SCG‐treated mice post‐infection (g‐i). (B) The scores of pathological changes in H5N1‐infected mice on days 3 and 5 after treatment.

Expression of IL‐6, TNF‐α, IFN‐γ, TLR3, and TRIF in the lungs

To further investigate whether SCG treatment could reduce the inflammatory response and possible mechanisms in H5N1‐infected mice, the expression of the genes IL‐6, TNF‐α, IFN‐γ, TLR3, and TRIF in the lungs was examined using real‐time quantitative PCR. As shown in Figure 4, SCG treatment reduced the expression of IL‐6 and TNF‐α from day 3 to day 5 pi, and the difference was significant between days 3 and 5 pi (P < 0·05). Continuously lower expression of IL‐6 and TNF‐α was detected in the lungs of oseltamivir‐treated mice, and the difference was significant on days 3 and 5 pi compared with virus‐infected control mice (P < 0·05). There were no significant differences in IFN‐γ expression in SCG‐ and PBS‐treated mice, but significant differences were detected in oseltamivir‐treated mice (P < 0·05). Different from these in PBS‐treated mice, the gene expression of TLR3 and TRIF in SCG‐treated mice was not significantly increased (P < 0·01). These observations were consistent with the histopathological changes described above, which suggested that SCG treatment could significantly reduce the inflammatory response in the lungs of H5N1‐infected mice by downregulation of TLR3 and TRIF expression. Therefore, SCG has the potential to improve survival during H5N1 infection.
Figure 4

The expression of ,α, γ, , and in the lungs of mice in the different treatment groups on days 3 and 5 post‐infection was determined using real‐time PCR. The results are presented as means ± SDs of triplicate samples from three independent experiments. * P < 0·05 and ** P < 0·01 compared with PBS group after infection; # P < 0·05 and # P < 0·01 compared with SCG group after infection.

The expression of ,α, γ, , and in the lungs of mice in the different treatment groups on days 3 and 5 post‐infection was determined using real‐time PCR. The results are presented as means ± SDs of triplicate samples from three independent experiments. * P < 0·05 and ** P < 0·01 compared with PBS group after infection; # P < 0·05 and # P < 0·01 compared with SCG group after infection.

Discussion

Highly pathogenic influenza A virus infection could induce acute lung injury with an accompanying severe inflammatory response, which is considered to be the main cause of death.28, 29, 30 Currently, oseltamivir is the first choice treatment, which has a significant effect on influenza A virus replication and inflammatory cytokine production, and can obviously improve the survival rate. However, an increasing number of drug‐resistant viruses have been discovered recently owing to the enormous genetic variation of influenza virus.31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 Because of the amplified inflammatory response after H5N1 infection, anti‐inflammatory drugs have been considered to treat humans exposed to the influenza A virus. A previous study found that orthotopic autologous liver transplantation could induce acute lung injury and that the administration of cromolyn sodium or ketotifen significantly inhibited the activation of mast cells and downregulated proinflammatory cytokine levels.38 Our previous studies demonstrated that mast cells are involved in lung injury in H5N1‐infected mice and that ketotifen treatment could significantly attenuate the pathological changes in the lungs.19 However, the present study is the first to demonstrate therapeutic effects of SCG against influenza A virus H5N1 in mice. Specifically, SCG treatment resulted in improved survival rates and clinical symptoms, alleviated lung lesions, and reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines. In this study, no significant difference was found in the viral titers in the lungs of SCG‐ and PBS‐treated mice on days 3 and 5 pi, which suggests that SCG did not inhibit H5N1 virus replication. In contrast, significant differences in the viral titers were detected between the oseltamivir group and the other two groups. Therefore, these results suggest that the SCG and oseltamivir act via different protective mechanisms because oseltamivir could inhibit viral replication whereas SCG only inhibited mast cell activation. Although virus replication was uninhibited in the lungs after H5N1 infection, but the clinical symptoms and the survival rates were improved after SCG treatment. The results indicate that SCG could protect mice from H5N1 virus infection by regulating the response of the mast cells. Moreover, compared with oseltamivir, the therapeutic effect of SCG was not as effective against highly pathogenic AIV H5N1 infection. This suggests that combination drug therapy might be the choice to delay the emergence of drug‐resistant strains and improve the therapeutic effect. Analysis of the respiratory pathological changes after H5N1 infection revealed that there was significant inflammatory cell infiltration in H5N1 virus‐infected mice, whereas fewer pathological changes were observed in SCG‐treated mice. This suggests that SCG could stabilize mast cells to reduce the release of cytokines and chemokines and alleviate inflammatory cell infiltration in the lungs. These results further suggest that mast cells are involved in the pathogenesis of H5N1 virus infection and that preventing aberrant inflammation could protect the mice from mortality. Previous studies reported that cytokine dysregulation contributed to the severity of influenza H5N1 virus infection.39, 40 Consistent with those, the current results in our report further support that an atypical immune response, rather than uncontrollable virus replication, resulted in acute mortality after highly pathogenic H5N1 virus infection. Cytokines play important roles in innate and adaptive immune responses during virus infection, particularly for eliminating the virus and protecting the host during the early infection period. However, the overexpression of these cytokines causes a variety of complications and pathological injuries. Previous studies reported that TNF‐α and IL‐6 could aggravate the clinical symptoms and histopathological changes of influenza virus‐infected mice.41, 42 We hypothesize that SCG could stabilize the membrane of mast cells, which inhibits the release of inflammatory mediators and alleviates the inflammatory response induced by H5N1 infection. In the current study, increased expression of TNF‐α and IL‐6 in PBS‐treated mice was detected on day 3 pi, and further increased expression was found on day 5 pi, which involved in the inflammatory lung injury. In contrast, the expression of TNF‐α and IL‐6 was decreased significantly on days 3 and 5 pi in SCG‐treated mice, which suggests that SCG could improve the mortality of virus‐infected mice by preventing the overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines. Many studies have found that mast cells could be involved in virus infection using TLR3, RIG‐I, and MDA5 to sense viral RNA.43, 44, 45 In our study, the expression of TLR3 and TRIF in the lungs of SCG‐treated mice decreased, which suggested that SCG might have some roles in the TLR3 pathway in mast cells during H5N1 infection. Similar to PBS‐treated mice, no increase in IFN‐γ in SCG‐treated mice was observed, which suggests that SCG could not inhibit virus replication, and it is inconsistent with the results of plaque assay. However, different from SCG, oseltamivir could inhibit the virus replication and increase the antiviral cytokine IFN‐γ expression, further indicating that there are different mechanisms of anti‐H5N1 virus infection between these two drugs. The reduced expression of TNF‐α and IL‐6 in SCG‐treated mice resulted in fewer respiratory pathological changes and milder clinical symptoms that were significantly different from those in H5N1 virus‐infected mice. Therefore, we concluded that SCG protected H5N1 virus‐infected mice by reducing proinflammatory cytokine production rather than inhibiting virus replication.

Conclusion

In summary, SCG protected mice effectively from death after H5N1 infection by alleviating inflammatory injury via its function as an inhibitor of mast cell degranulation. These data provide a novel approach for combating highly pathogenic influenza virus infection.
  45 in total

1.  Mast cell-induced lung injury in mice infected with H5N1 influenza virus.

Authors:  Yanxin Hu; Yi Jin; Deping Han; Guozhong Zhang; Shanping Cao; Jingjing Xie; Jia Xue; Yi Li; Di Meng; Xiaoxu Fan; Lun-Quan Sun; Ming Wang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Induction of TNF-alpha in human macrophages by avian and human influenza viruses.

Authors:  Yuwarat Monteerarat; Saori Sakabe; Somying Ngamurulert; Sirawat Srichatraphimuk; Wasana Jiamtom; Kridsada Chaichuen; Arunee Thitithanyanont; Parichart Permpikul; Taweesak Songserm; Pilaipan Puthavathana; Chairul A Nidom; Le Quynh Mai; Kiyoko Iwatsuki-Horimoto; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Prasert Auewarakul
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Mast cell mediated inflammatory response in chickens after infection with very virulent infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Decheng Wang; Jinmao Xiong; Ruiping She; Liqiang Liu; Yanmei Zhang; Dongmei Luo; Wengui Li; Yanxin Hu; Yinghua Wang; Qiong Zhang; Quan Sun
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Mammalian pathogenesis of oseltamivir-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus isolated in South Korea.

Authors:  Donghyok Kwon; Kyeongcheol Shin; Su-Jin Kim; Joo-Yeon Lee; Chun Kang
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.303

5.  Human influenza A H5N1 virus related to a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus.

Authors:  E C Claas; A D Osterhaus; R van Beek; J C De Jong; G F Rimmelzwaan; D A Senne; S Krauss; K F Shortridge; R G Webster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Pathogenesis of Hong Kong H5N1 influenza virus NS gene reassortants in mice: the role of cytokines and B- and T-cell responses.

Authors:  Aleksandr S Lipatov; Samita Andreansky; Richard J Webby; Diane J Hulse; Jerold E Rehg; Scott Krauss; Daniel R Perez; Peter C Doherty; Robert G Webster; Mark Y Sangster
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.891

7.  Mammalian innate resistance to highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus infection is mediated through reduced proinflammation and infectious virus release.

Authors:  Rahul K Nelli; Stephen P Dunham; Suresh V Kuchipudi; Gavin A White; Belinda Baquero-Perez; Pengxiang Chang; Amir Ghaemmaghami; Sharon M Brookes; Ian H Brown; Kin-Chow Chang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 8.  A rationale for using steroids in the treatment of severe cases of H5N1 avian influenza.

Authors:  Marissa J Carter
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Establishment of multiple sublineages of H5N1 influenza virus in Asia: implications for pandemic control.

Authors:  H Chen; G J D Smith; K S Li; J Wang; X H Fan; J M Rayner; D Vijaykrishna; J X Zhang; L J Zhang; C T Guo; C L Cheung; K M Xu; L Duan; K Huang; K Qin; Y H C Leung; W L Wu; H R Lu; Y Chen; N S Xia; T S P Naipospos; K Y Yuen; S S Hassan; S Bahri; T D Nguyen; R G Webster; J S M Peiris; Y Guan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Prophylaxis and therapy of pandemic H1N1 virus infection using egg yolk antibody.

Authors:  Yuan-e Yang; Junlin Wen; Suqing Zhao; Kun Zhang; Yingliang Zhou
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.014

View more
  9 in total

1.  Influenza A Viruses Replicate Productively in Mouse Mastocytoma Cells (P815) and Trigger Pro-inflammatory Cytokine and Chemokine Production through TLR3 Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Di Meng; Caiyun Huo; Ming Wang; Jin Xiao; Bo Liu; Tangting Wei; Hong Dong; Guozhong Zhang; Yanxin Hu; Lunquan Sun
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  COVID-19: Famotidine, Histamine, Mast Cells, and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Robert W Malone; Philip Tisdall; Philip Fremont-Smith; Yongfeng Liu; Xi-Ping Huang; Kris M White; Lisa Miorin; Elena Moreno; Assaf Alon; Elise Delaforge; Christopher D Hennecker; Guanyu Wang; Joshua Pottel; Robert V Blair; Chad J Roy; Nora Smith; Julie M Hall; Kevin M Tomera; Gideon Shapiro; Anthony Mittermaier; Andrew C Kruse; Adolfo García-Sastre; Bryan L Roth; Jill Glasspool-Malone; Darrell O Ricke
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Harnessing the Power of Mast Cells in unconventional Immunotherapy Strategies and Vaccine Adjuvants.

Authors:  Steven Willows; Marianna Kulka
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Experimental Search for New Means of Pathogenetic Therapy COVID-19: Inhibitor of H2-Receptors Famotidine Increases the Effect of Oseltamivir on Survival and Immune Status of Mice Infected by A/PR/8/34 (H1N1).

Authors:  N V Goncharov; K A Vasilyev; I V Kudryavtsev; P P Avdonin; D A Belinskaia; M A Stukova; O V Shamova; P V Avdonin
Journal:  J Evol Biochem Physiol       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 5.  Can FDA-Approved Immunomodulatory Drugs be Repurposed/Repositioned to Alleviate Chronic Pain?

Authors:  Kufreobong E Inyang; Joseph K Folger; Geoffroy Laumet
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Pre-Treatment with Zirconia Nanoparticles Reduces Inflammation Induced by the Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus.

Authors:  Caiyun Huo; Jin Xiao; Kai Xiao; Shumei Zou; Ming Wang; Peng Qi; Tianlong Liu; Yanxin Hu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-01-30

Review 7.  "Cytokine storm", not only in COVID-19 patients. Mini-review.

Authors:  Norbert Lukan
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 8.  Divergent Mast Cell Responses Modulate Antiviral Immunity During Influenza Virus Infection.

Authors:  Ashleigh R Murphy-Schafer; Silke Paust
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Identification of FDA approved drugs against SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro), drug repurposing approach.

Authors:  Zahra Molavi; Sara Razi; Seyed Amir Mirmotalebisohi; Amirjafar Adibi; Marzieh Sameni; Farshid Karami; Vahid Niazi; Zahra Niknam; Morteza Aliashrafi; Mohammad Taheri; Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard; Shabnam Jeibouei; Soodeh Mahdian; Hakimeh Zali; Mohammad Mehdi Ranjbar; Mohsen Yazdani
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.529

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.