Literature DB >> 26176278

Death Dilemma and Organism Recovery in Ecotoxicology.

Roman Ashauer1,2, Isabel O'Connor1, Anita Hintermeister1, Beate I Escher1,3,4.   

Abstract

Why do some individuals survive after exposure to chemicals while others die? Either, the tolerance threshold is distributed among the individuals in a population, and its exceedance leads to certain death, or all individuals share the same threshold above which death occurs stochastically. The previously published General Unified Threshold model of Survival (GUTS) established a mathematical relationship between the two assumptions. According to this model stochastic death would result in systematically faster compensation and damage repair mechanisms than individual tolerance. Thus, we face a circular conclusion dilemma because inference about the death mechanism is inherently linked to the speed of damage recovery. We provide empirical evidence that the stochastic death model consistently infers much faster toxicodynamic recovery than the individual tolerance model. Survival data can be explained by either, slower damage recovery and a wider individual tolerance distribution, or faster damage recovery paired with a narrow tolerance distribution. The toxicodynamic model parameters exhibited meaningful patterns in chemical space, which is why we suggest toxicodynamic model parameters as novel phenotypic anchors for in vitro to in vivo toxicity extrapolation. GUTS appears to be a promising refinement of traditional survival curve analysis and dose response models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26176278     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Jörg Hackermüller; Tobias Polte; Stefan Scholz; Achim Aigner; Rolf Altenburger; Alexander Böhme; Stephanie K Bopp; Werner Brack; Wibke Busch; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Adrian Covaci; Adolf Eisenträger; James J Galligan; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Thomas Hartung; Michaela Hein; Gunda Herberth; Annika Jahnke; Jos Kleinjans; Nils Klüver; Martin Krauss; Marja Lamoree; Irina Lehmann; Till Luckenbach; Gary W Miller; Andrea Müller; David H Phillips; Thorsten Reemtsma; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Gerrit Schüürmann; Benno Schwikowski; Yu-Mei Tan; Saskia Trump; Susanne Walter-Rohde; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Predicting Mixture Effects over Time with Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic Models (GUTS): Assumptions, Experimental Testing, and Predictive Power.

Authors:  Sylvain Bart; Tjalling Jager; Alex Robinson; Elma Lahive; David J Spurgeon; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Comparative toxicity of hydrocarbons for evaluation of Lysmata boggessi as an experimental proxy for deep-water column micronekton.

Authors:  D Abigail Renegar; Nicholas R Turner; Gopal Bera; Eileen G Whitemiller; Bernhard M Riegl; José L Sericano; Anthony Knap
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2022-03-26

4.  Computationally Efficient Implementation of a Novel Algorithm for the General Unified Threshold Model of Survival (GUTS).

Authors:  Carlo Albert; Sören Vogel; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Modelling survival: exposure pattern, species sensitivity and uncertainty.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Carlo Albert; Starrlight Augustine; Nina Cedergreen; Sandrine Charles; Virginie Ducrot; Andreas Focks; Faten Gabsi; André Gergs; Benoit Goussen; Tjalling Jager; Nynke I Kramer; Anna-Maija Nyman; Veronique Poulsen; Stefan Reichenberger; Ralf B Schäfer; Paul J Van den Brink; Karin Veltman; Sören Vogel; Elke I Zimmer; Thomas G Preuss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Calibration and validation of toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic models for three neonicotinoids and some aquatic macroinvertebrates.

Authors:  Andreas Focks; Dick Belgers; Marie-Claire Boerwinkel; Laura Buijse; Ivo Roessink; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Memory effect of arsenic-induced cellular response and its influences on toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticle.

Authors:  Su Liu; Bing Wu; Yue Yu; Zhuoyan Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.