| Literature DB >> 26176003 |
Abstract
Systematic study of how different drying methods, namely hot-air drying, vacuum-drying, and freeze-drying, affect color, browning index, degree of rehydration, water solubility, and vitamin C content is critical for utilizing pine needle powders (PNP) as a novel ingredient in functional foods. Samples prepared by vacuum-drying showed a significantly higher L*-value, whereas higher a*- and b*-values were detected in the hot-air dried samples (P<0.05). The browning index was significantly higher in samples prepared by vacuum-drying compared to samples prepared by freeze-drying (P<0.05). Freeze-dried PNP exhibited a significantly higher degree of rehydration than hot-air dried samples (P<0.05). Water solubilities of freeze-dried and hot-air dried samples were significantly higher than that of vacuum-dried sample (P<0.05). Vitamin C was less destroyed during freeze-drying compared to hot-air or vacuum-drying (P<0.05). Freeze-dried samples displayed a clear porous structure and appeared to have a bigger space, whereas hot-air dried samples showed lower porosity than vacuum and freeze-dried samples.Entities:
Keywords: drying methods; physicochemical properties; pine needle; powder
Year: 2015 PMID: 26176003 PMCID: PMC4500518 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2015.20.2.143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Fig. 1Scanning electron microscope photographs (15.0 kV 500×, 15.0 kV 1,000×, and 15.0 kV 1,500×) of PNP prepared by (A) hot-air, (B) vacuum, and (C) freeze-drying methods, respectively.
Selected physical characteristics of PNP as affected by drying methods
| Sample | Color | Browning index | Degree of rehydration (%) | Water solubility (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Fresh | 25.32±1.26c | 1.77±0.22d | 8.88±0.57c | - | - | - |
| Hot-air drying | 46.56±0.52b | 4.43±0.03a | 30.66±0.13a | 1.411±0.010b | 286.75±25.59b | 42.37±3.98a |
| Vacuum-drying | 49.01±0.20a | 1.11±0.09b | 29.66±0.39b | 1.506±0.004a | 354.00±34.35a | 34.72±1.25b |
| Freeze-drying | 46.93±0.24b | −0.27±0.06c | 29.56±0.25b | 0.346±0.005c | 401.50±47.85a | 46.43±3.77a |
Means with different letters (a-d) in the same column are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P <0.05).
Fig. 2Vitamin C content as affected by different drying methods. Means with different letters (a,b) are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P<0.05).