| Literature DB >> 26175995 |
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to investigate the inhibitory effect of jicama extract on α-glucosidase activity, α-amylase activity, and postprandial hyperglycemia in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice. Jicama extract showed prominent inhibitory effects against α-glucosidase and α-amylase. The IC50 values of jicama extract against α-glucosidase and α-amylase were 0.083±0.004 and 0.091±0.017 mg/mL, respectively. The increase in postprandial blood glucose levels was more significantly suppressed in the jicama extract-administered group than in the control group of both STZ-induced diabetic and normal mice. Blood glucose levels of the control group increased to 383.75±11.54 and 402.50±15.32 mg/dL at 30 and 60 min after a meal and decreased to 349.67±11.62 mg/dL at 120 min. However, postprandial blood glucose levels were significantly decreased, when diabetic mice were fed with jicama extract (342.00±15.73, 367.00±13.00, and 329.67±12.43 mg/dL at 30, 60, and 120 min, respectively). Furthermore, the area under the curve was significantly decreased with jicama extract administration in diabetic mice (P<0.05). Therefore, these results indicate that jicama extract may help decrease postprandial blood glucose level by inhibiting α-glucosidase.Entities:
Keywords: diabetic mice; jicama extract; postprandial hyperglycemia
Year: 2015 PMID: 26175995 PMCID: PMC4500521 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2015.20.2.88
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Nutritional composition of jicama1)
| Principle | Nutrient value |
|---|---|
| Energy | 38 kcal |
| Carbohydrates | 8.82 g |
| Protein | 0.72 g |
| Total fat | 0.19 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg |
| Dietary fiber | 4.9 g |
Nutritional composition of jicama is per 100 g.
(Source: USDA National Nutrient data base)
Fig. 1Inhibitory effects of jicama extract on α-glucosidase. Values are expressed as means±SD in triplicate experiments. Values with different letters are significantly different at P<0.05 as analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Acarbose (0.10 mg/mL) was used as the positive control.
Fig. 2Inhibitory effects of jicama extract on α-amylase. Values are expressed as means±SD in triplicate experiments. Values with different letters are significantly different at P<0.05 as analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Acarbose (0.10 mg/mL) was used as the positive control.
IC50 values of inhibitory effect of jicama extract on α-glucosidase and α-amylase (unit: mg/mL)
| Sample | IC50 | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| α-glucosidase | α-amylase | |
| Jicama | 0.083±0.004 | 0.091±0.017 |
| Acarbose | 0.075±0.006 | 0.164±0.033 |
IC50 value is the concentration of sample required for 50% inhibition. Each value is expressed as mean±SD in triplicate experiments.
P<0.05 vs positive control, acarbose.
not significant.
Fig. 3Blood glucose levels after the administration of jicama extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Control (distilled water), jicama (200 mg/kg), and acarbose (100 mg/kg) were fed with orally with starch (2 g/kg). Each value is expressed as mean±SD of seven mice (n=42). A significant difference was identified at P<0.05 as analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Fig. 4Blood glucose levels after the administration of jicama extract in normal mice. Control (distilled water), jicama (200 mg/kg), and acarbose (100 mg/kg) were fed with orally with starch (2 g/kg). Each value is expressed as mean±SD of seven mice (n=42). A significant difference was identified P<0.05 as analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Area under the curve (AUC) of postprandial glucose responses of normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice (unit: mg·h/dL)
| Group | AUC | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Normal mice | Diabetic mice | |
| Jicama | 259.32±34.07 | 685.18±26.00 |
| Acarbose | 204.58±25.98 | 653.57±21.38 |
| Control | 319.56±29.52 | 742.58±24.75 |
Jicama extract (200 mg/kg), acarbose (100 mg/kg), and control (distilled water) were co-administered orally with starch (2 g/kg). Each value is expressed as mean±SD of seven mice (n=42).
Values with different letters are significantly different at P<0.05 as analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test.