Literature DB >> 26175883

Risks and Pitfalls of Epidural Injections during Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Few Comments.

Mohammad Sadegh Sanie1, Mohamed Amin Ghobadifar2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26175883      PMCID: PMC4500787          DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.3.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Pain        ISSN: 2005-9159


× No keyword cloud information.

LETTERS TO EDITORS

We read with curiosity the article entitled "Comparison of the efficacy of caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar disc herniation: is one method superior to the other?" published in the Korean Journal of Pain [1]. Manchikanti et al. skillfully presented an intriguing review article of the effects of different epidural injection approaches in managing lumbar disc herniation. Their review showed that epidural injections provide relief in patients with the chronic lumbar disc herniation. However, we would like to offer suggestions to the authors about the complications and risks of epidural injections, as illustrated in the results discussed below. It showed that probable mechanisms of spinal cord injury in patients undergoing cervical, thoracic, and lumbar epidural infiltration techniques include: spinal cord infarction due to needle-induced vasospasm, the embolization of particulate steroids, the mechanical disruption of radiculomedullary arteries, and compression from an epidural abscess or hematoma are [2]. Death as well as infarction of the brain stem, cerebellum, thalamus, and spinal cord have been reported after epidural injections, either by a transforaminal or an interlaminar procedure [3]. On the other hand, epidural injections have often been shown to be implicated in permanent and severe complications, including infection, intravascular injections, injections into the spinal fluid, nerve damage, hemorrhages, paralysis, weakening of the disc, or results of discitis and arachnoiditis [4]. Also, Manchikanti et al. [5] in a prospective, non-randomized study of patients undergoing epidural injections observed the following complications: intravascular injection, local bleeding, oozing, and local hematoma with profuse bleeding. Thus, in the light of the unexpected complications and aforementioned detrimental outcomes, a critical re-assessment of the indication of epidural injection in the management of lumbar disc herniation is prompted. We feel that careful documentation and precise needle positioning are required. In addition, the application of non-particulate steroids is recommended. Finally, more studies are required on this topic.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Particulate versus non-particulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal or interlaminar epidural steroid injections: an update.

Authors:  Tobias J Dietrich; Reto Sutter; Johannes M Froehlich; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Must we discontinue selective cervical nerve root blocks? Report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Juerg Hodler; Norbert Boos; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Complications of fluoroscopically directed facet joint nerve blocks: a prospective evaluation of 7,500 episodes with 43,000 nerve blocks.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Yogesh Malla; Bradley W Wargo; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati; Bert Fellows
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Inadvertent disk injection during transforaminal epidural steroid injection: steps for prevention and management.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; David N Maine; Sean M Shockey; Sapna Kudchadkar; Scott Griffith
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Comparison of the efficacy of caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar disc herniation: is one method superior to the other?

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh; Vidyasagar Pampati; Frank Je Falco; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2015-01-02
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Superior articular process cross-sectional area is a new sensitive parameter for the diagnosis of lumbar central canal spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Sang Joon An; Jong-Uk Mun; Keum Nae Kang; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Optimal cut-off points of lumbar pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter to predict lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sang Joon An; Soo Il Choi; Keum Nae Kang; Syn-Hae Yoon; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Usefulness of the Inferior Articular Process's Cross-Sectional Area as a Morphological Parameter for Predicting Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Sooho Lee; Taeha Lim; Young-Seob Lim; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.