Mintu P Turakhia1, Paul D Ziegler2, Susan K Schmitt2, Yuchiao Chang2, Jun Fan2, Claire T Than2, Edmund K Keung2, Daniel E Singer2. 1. From the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, CA (M.P.T., S.K.S., J.F., C.T.T.); Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (M.P.T.); Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Mounds View, MN (P.D.Z.); San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA (E.K.K.); and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Y.C., D.E.S.). mintu@stanford.edu. 2. From the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, CA (M.P.T., S.K.S., J.F., C.T.T.); Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (M.P.T.); Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Mounds View, MN (P.D.Z.); San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA (E.K.K.); and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Y.C., D.E.S.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The temporal relationship of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke risk is controversial. We evaluated this relationship via a case-crossover analysis of ischemic strokes in a large cohort of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 9850 patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices remotely monitored in the Veterans Administration Health Care System between 2002 and 2012. There were 187 patients with acute ischemic stroke and continuous heart rhythm monitoring for 120 days before the stroke (age, 69±8.4 years; 98% with an implantable defibrillator). We compared each patient's daily AF burden in the 30 days before stroke (case period) with their AF burden during days 91 to 120 pre stroke (control period). Defining positive AF burden as ≥5.5 hours of AF on any given day, 156 patients (83%) had no positive AF burden in both periods and, in fact, had little to no AF; 15 (8%) patients had positive AF burden in both periods. Among the discordant (informative) patients, 13 exceeded 5.5 hours of AF in the case period but not in the control period, whereas 3 had positive AF burden in the control but not in the case period (warfarin-adjusted odds ratio for stroke, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-13.4). Odds ratio for stroke was highest (17.4; 95% confidence interval, 5.39-73.1) in the 5 days immediately after a qualifying occurrence of AF and decreased toward 1.0 as the period after the AF occurrence increased beyond 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this population with continuous heart rhythm recording, multiple hours of AF had a strong but transient effect raising stroke risk.
BACKGROUND: The temporal relationship of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke risk is controversial. We evaluated this relationship via a case-crossover analysis of ischemic strokes in a large cohort of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 9850 patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices remotely monitored in the Veterans Administration Health Care System between 2002 and 2012. There were 187 patients with acute ischemic stroke and continuous heart rhythm monitoring for 120 days before the stroke (age, 69±8.4 years; 98% with an implantable defibrillator). We compared each patient's daily AF burden in the 30 days before stroke (case period) with their AF burden during days 91 to 120 pre stroke (control period). Defining positive AF burden as ≥5.5 hours of AF on any given day, 156 patients (83%) had no positive AF burden in both periods and, in fact, had little to no AF; 15 (8%) patients had positive AF burden in both periods. Among the discordant (informative) patients, 13 exceeded 5.5 hours of AF in the case period but not in the control period, whereas 3 had positive AF burden in the control but not in the case period (warfarin-adjusted odds ratio for stroke, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-13.4). Odds ratio for stroke was highest (17.4; 95% confidence interval, 5.39-73.1) in the 5 days immediately after a qualifying occurrence of AF and decreased toward 1.0 as the period after the AF occurrence increased beyond 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this population with continuous heart rhythm recording, multiple hours of AF had a strong but transient effect raising stroke risk.
Authors: Lichy Han; Mariam Askari; Russ B Altman; Susan K Schmitt; Jun Fan; Jason P Bentley; Sanjiv M Narayan; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2019-10-15
Authors: Karl Georg Haeusler; Klaus Gröschel; Martin Köhrmann; Stefan D Anker; Johannes Brachmann; Michael Böhm; Hans-Christoph Diener; Wolfram Doehner; Matthias Endres; Christian Gerloff; Hagen B Huttner; Manfred Kaps; Paulus Kirchhof; Darius Günther Nabavi; Christian H Nolte; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Burkert Pieske; Sven Poli; Wolf Rüdiger Schäbitz; Götz Thomalla; Roland Veltkamp; Thorsten Steiner; Ulrich Laufs; Joachim Röther; Rolf Wachter; Renate Schnabel Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Alan S Go; Kristi Reynolds; Jingrong Yang; Nigel Gupta; Judith Lenane; Sue Hee Sung; Teresa N Harrison; Taylor I Liu; Matthew D Solomon Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexander C Perino; Jun Fan; Mariam Askari; Paul A Heidenreich; Edmund Keung; Merritt H Raitt; Jonathan P Piccini; Paul D Ziegler; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nathan E Wineinger; Paddy M Barrett; Yunyue Zhang; Ikram Irfanullah; Evan D Muse; Steven R Steinhubl; Eric J Topol Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Alexander C Perino; Jun Fan; Susan K Schmitt; Mariam Askari; Daniel W Kaiser; Abhishek Deshmukh; Paul A Heidenreich; Christopher Swan; Sanjiv M Narayan; Paul J Wang; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Rod Passman; Peter Leong-Sit; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Anna Huskin; Todd T Tomson; Richard Bernstein; Ethan Ellis; Jonathan W Waks; Peter Zimetbaum Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2015-11-23
Authors: Daniel A Steinhaus; Peter J Zimetbaum; Rod S Passman; Peter Leong-Sit; Matthew R Reynolds Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2016-10-04