| Literature DB >> 26175463 |
A Kozina1, D Lemic2, R Bazok2, K M Mikac3, C M Mclean3, M Ivezić4, J Igrc Barčić5.
Abstract
It is assumed that the abundance of Agriotes wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) is affected by agro-ecological factors such as climatic and edaphic factors and the crop/previous crop grown at the sites investigated. The aim of this study, conducted in three different geographic counties in Croatia from 2007 to 2009, was to determine the factors that influence the abundance of adult click beetle of the species Agriotes brevis Cand., Agriotes lineatus (L.), Agriotes obscurus (L.), Agriotes sputator (L.), and Agriotes ustulatus Schall. The mean annual air temperature, total rainfall, percentage of coarse and fine sand, coarse and fine silt and clay, the soil pH, and humus were investigated as potential factors that may influence abundance. Adult click beetle emergence was monitored using sex pheromone traps (YATLORf and VARb3). Exploratory data analysis was preformed via regression tree models and regional differences in Agriotes species' abundance were predicted based on the agro-ecological factors measured. It was found that the best overall predictor of A. brevis abundance was the previous crop grown. Conversely, the best predictor of A. lineatus abundance was the current crop being grown and the percentage of humus. The best predictor of A. obscurus abundance was soil pH in KCl. The best predictor of A. sputator abundance was rainfall. Finally, the best predictors of A. ustulatus abundance were soil pH in KCl and humus. These results may be useful in regional pest control programs or for predicting future outbreaks of these species.Entities:
Keywords: Abundance; Agro-ecological factor; Click beetle; Prediction; Regression tree
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26175463 PMCID: PMC4677495 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iev079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Map of Croatia showing the geographic location of the three counties where Agriotes species were sampled.
Characteristics of the climatic conditions prevailing in the three counties of Croatia where Agriotes spp. were sampled and corresponding ANOVA results
| County | Mean air temperature (°C) ± SD | Total amount of rainfall (mm) ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 ± 0.08c | 751.5 ± 53.61a | |
| 11.67 ± 0.33b | 799.38 ± 80.62a | |
| 13.05 ± 0.05a | 665.01 ± 138.27b | |
| 0.16 | 65.93 |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05; Tukey’s HSD).
Physical and chemical properties of the soil samples collected in three counties of Croatia and the corresponding ANOVA results
| Soil physico-chemistry | COUNTY | HSD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koprivnica-Križevci | Virovitica-Podravina | Vukovar- Sirmium | ||
| 1.14 | 2.35 | 1.62 | ns | |
| 12.46a | 11.83a | 2.47b | 4.95 | |
| 29.19b | 38.42a | 35.87a | 5.94 | |
| 37.63a | 31.65b | 28.39b | 3.61 | |
| 19.58b | 15.75c | 31.65a | 3.16 | |
| 6.8b | 6.65b | 7.71a | 0.55 | |
| 5.77b | 5.58b | 6.93a | 0.75 | |
| 4.96a | 3.2b | 3.29b | 0.74 | |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05; Tukey’s HSD).
The average number of Agriotes spp. individuals collected over time in three counties of Croatia and the corresponding ANOVA results
| Species | County | Year of investigation | HSD1
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | |||
| 24.6 b | 49.2 ab | 91.8 a | 60.366 | ||
| 45.6 | 56.8 | 73.4 | ns | ||
| 8.4 b | 26.2 a | — | 11.23 | ||
| ns | ns | ns | |||
| 115.8 bA | 142.4 bA | 860.6 a | 657.53 | ||
| 30.8 bB | 98.2 aAB | 82.2 ab | 59.238 | ||
| 6.8 bB | 21.4 aB | — | 4.269 | ||
| 72.63 | 81.654 | ns | |||
| 9.8 | 16.8 | 45.4 | ns | ||
| 2.4 | 11.8 | 20.6 | ns | ||
| 106.8 | 30.0 | — | ns | ||
| ns | ns | ns | |||
| 34.8 | 71.2 | 148.6 | ns | ||
| 18.2 c | 69.0 b | 114.8 a | 41.746 | ||
| 33.8 b | 99.0 a | — | 60.94 | ||
| ns | ns | ns | |||
| 234.2 | 110.0 | 97.8 | ns | ||
| 395.4 | 273.4 | 297.6 | ns | ||
| 708.6a | 216.4b | — | 419.064 | ||
| ns | ns | ns | |||
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05; Tukey’s HSD); 1small letters refer to differences among years of investigation; 2capital letters refer to differences among counties.
Fig. 2.(a and b) Variables most influential in predicting Agriotes brevis abundance using the Regression TREE procedure.
Fig. 3.(a and b) Variables most influential in predicting A. lineatus abundance using the Regression TREE procedure.
Fig. 4.Variables most influential in predicting A. obscurus abundance using the Regression TREE procedure.
Fig. 5.Variables most influential in predicting A. sputator abundance using the Regression TREE procedure.
Fig. 6.Variables most influential in predicting A. ustulatus abundance using the Regression TREE procedure.