Edward Wright1, Cyril C Grueter2, Nicole Seiler1, Didier Abavandimwe3, Tara S Stoinski4, Sylvia Ortmann5, Martha M Robbins1. 1. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. 2. School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia,Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia. 3. Karisoke Research Center, The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International, Musanze, North Province, Rwanda. 4. The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International, Atlanta, GA, 30315, USA. 5. Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Here, we compare food availability and relate this to differences in energy intake rates, time spent feeding, and daily travel distance of gorillas in the two populations. Comparative intraspecific studies investigating spatiotemporal variation in food availability can help us understand the complex relationships between ecology, behavior, and life history in primates and are relevant to understanding hominin evolution. Differences in several variables have been documented between the two mountain gorilla populations in the Virunga Massif and Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, but few direct comparisons that link ecological conditions to feeding behavior have been made. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using similar data collection protocols we conducted vegetation sampling and nutritional analysis on important foods to estimate food availability. Detailed observations of feeding behavior were used to compute energy intake rates and daily travel distance was estimated through GPS readings. RESULTS: Food availability was overall lower and had greater temporal variability in Bwindi than in the Virungas. Energy intake rates and time spent feeding were similar in both populations, but energy intake rates were significantly higher in Bwindi during the period of high fruit consumption. Daily travel distances were significantly shorter in the Virungas. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, despite the differences in food availability, we did not find large differences in the energetics of gorillas in the two populations, although further work is needed to more precisely quantify energy expenditure and energy balance. These results emphasize that even species with high food availability can exhibit behavioral and energetic responses to variable ecological conditions, which are likely to affect growth, reproduction, and survival.
OBJECTIVE: Here, we compare food availability and relate this to differences in energy intake rates, time spent feeding, and daily travel distance of gorillas in the two populations. Comparative intraspecific studies investigating spatiotemporal variation in food availability can help us understand the complex relationships between ecology, behavior, and life history in primates and are relevant to understanding hominin evolution. Differences in several variables have been documented between the two mountain gorilla populations in the Virunga Massif and Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, but few direct comparisons that link ecological conditions to feeding behavior have been made. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using similar data collection protocols we conducted vegetation sampling and nutritional analysis on important foods to estimate food availability. Detailed observations of feeding behavior were used to compute energy intake rates and daily travel distance was estimated through GPS readings. RESULTS: Food availability was overall lower and had greater temporal variability in Bwindi than in the Virungas. Energy intake rates and time spent feeding were similar in both populations, but energy intake rates were significantly higher in Bwindi during the period of high fruit consumption. Daily travel distances were significantly shorter in the Virungas. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, despite the differences in food availability, we did not find large differences in the energetics of gorillas in the two populations, although further work is needed to more precisely quantify energy expenditure and energy balance. These results emphasize that even species with high food availability can exhibit behavioral and energetic responses to variable ecological conditions, which are likely to affect growth, reproduction, and survival.
Authors: Moreen Uwimbabazi; Jessica M Rothman; Gilbert I Basuta; Zarin P Machanda; Nancy L Conklin-Brittain; Richard W Wrangham Journal: Afr J Ecol Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 0.923
Authors: Erin R Vogel; Mark E Harrison; Astri Zulfa; Timothy D Bransford; Shauhin E Alavi; Simon Husson; Helen Morrogh-Bernard; Twentinolosa Firtsman; Sri Suci Utami-Atmoko; Maria A van Noordwijk; Wartika Rosa Farida Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cyril C Grueter; Andrew M Robbins; Didier Abavandimwe; Veronica Vecellio; Felix Ndagijimana; Tara S Stoinski; Martha M Robbins Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Martha M Robbins; Moses Akantorana; Joseph Arinaitwe; Peter Kabano; Charles Kayijamahe; Maryke Gray; Katerina Guschanski; Jack Richardson; Justin Roy; Vastine Tindimwebwa; Linda Vigilant; Andrew M Robbins Journal: Primates Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 2.163