Literature DB >> 26174410

Discordance Between Patient and Clinician Experiences and Priorities in Rural Interhospital Transfer: A Mixed Methods Study.

Nicholas M Mohr1,2, Terrence S Wong1, Brett Faine3, Adam Schlichting1,4, Joseph Noack1, Azeemuddin Ahmed1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rural emergency department (ED) patients require interhospital transfer for definitive care at nearly 6 times the national rate, yet transfer decision-making is variable. The goal of this study was to understand patient experiences, preferences, and decision-making in the rural interhospital transfer process, and to measure the concordance between patient opinions and provider perceptions.
METHODS: Ours is a mixed methods study of patients transferred to a 711-bed Midwestern academic medical center and the emergency physicians in community hospitals. Qualitative interviews were conducted by a single research assistant with admitted patients transferred from an ED, and a corresponding survey was distributed to community emergency physicians. Standardized scenarios were posed to both groups to understand transfer priorities.
FINDINGS: Seventy-nine patients and 40 physicians participated in this study. Patients and physicians cited proximity to home, medical expertise, a personal relationship with a health care provider, health insurance, privacy concerns, and patient choice as the primary factors that influenced patient transfer priorities. Compared with patient respondents, physicians overestimated the patient-perceived importance of proximity to home (P = .015) and being cared for by a personal physician (P = .049), but they underestimated the value of receiving treatment in a comprehensive medical center (P = .002). In standardized scenarios, physicians agreed with patients in transfer preferences for conditions requiring neurosurgical consultation, but they underestimated patients' desire for transfer for pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.
CONCLUSION: Patients and physicians recognize similar factors that influence patient preferences in interhospital ED transfer, but physicians may overestimate the value of nonmedical influences on decision-making priorities.
© 2015 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to care; hospitals; medical care; satisfaction with care; utilization of health services

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26174410     DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  5 in total

1.  Rural Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Who Bypass Rural Hospitals Have Increased Mortality: An Instrumental Variables Approach.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; Marcia M Ward; James C Torner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Regional to tertiary inter-hospital transfer versus in-house percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Delara Javat; Clare Heal; Jennifer Banks; Stefan Buchholz; Zhihua Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison between urban and rural mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study in South Korea.

Authors:  Hye Sim Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Inah Kim; Kyungsuk Lee; Hoon Jo; Sang Baek Koh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Potentially avoidable inter-facility transfer from Veterans Health Administration emergency departments: A cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Chaorong Wu; Michael J Ward; Candace D McNaughton; Kelly Richardson; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study).

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Uche E Okoro; Brian M Fuller; Kalyn Campbell; Morgan B Swanson; Stephen Q Simpson; Edith A Parker; Luke J Mack; Amanda Bell; Katie DeJong; Brett Faine; Anne Zepeski; Keith Mueller; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Christopher R Carpenter; Michael P Jones; Marcia M Ward
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.744

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.