Literature DB >> 26173780

Mutant KRAS associated malic enzyme 1 expression is a predictive marker for radiation therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer.

Gaurab Chakrabarti1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an aggressive tumor that is treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation if the patient is not a candidate for surgery. Predictive biomarkers for response to radiotherapy are lacking in this patient population, making it a non-tailored therapy regimen with unknown outcome. Twenty to 30 % of NSCLC harbor an activating mutation in KRAS that may confer radioresistance. We hypothesized that mutant KRAS can regulate glutamine metabolism genes in NSCLC and maintain tumor redox balance through transamination reactions that generate cytosolic NADPH via malic enzyme 1 (ME1), which may contribute to radioresistance.
FINDINGS: A doxycycline-inducible mouse model of KRAS (G12D) driven NSCLC and patient data was analyzed from multiple publicly accessible databases including TCGA, CCLE, NCBI GEO and Project Achilles. ME1 expression was found to be mutant KRAS associated in both a NSCLC mouse model and human NSCLC cancer cell lines. Perturbing glutamine metabolism sensitized mutant KRAS, but not wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines to radiation treatment. NSCLC survival analysis revealed that patients with elevated ME1 and GOT1 expression had significantly worse outcomes after radiotherapy, but this was not seen after chemotherapy alone.
CONCLUSIONS: KRAS driven glutamine metabolism genes, specifically ME1 and GOT1 reactions, may be a predictive marker and potential therapeutic target for radiotherapy in NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26173780      PMCID: PMC4502640          DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0457-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1748-717X            Impact factor:   3.481


Background and findings

Patients with locally advanced NSCLC that are not candidates for surgery are treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy [1]. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of radiation therapy in this patient population have shown mixed results [2-4]. Furthermore, 20–30 % of all NSCLC harbor an activating mutation in KRAS [5]. Interestingly, several studies have demonstrated that the presence of mutant KRAS may act as a marker for radioresistance in NSCLC, yet the exact mechanism is not well understood [6-12]. Recent literature has demonstrated that mutant KRAS reprograms glutamine metabolism flux in pancreatic cancers through cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase (GOT1) and malic enzyme 1 (ME1) [13-18]. By synthesizing significant intracellular pools of NADPH via ME1, KRAS-reprogrammed pancreatic cancers rely on glutamine for redox balance in the face of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from rapid proliferation and microenvironment stressors (Fig. 1a) [16]. In this context, NADPH is an essential co-factor to blunt ROS formation through the maintenance of intracellular reduced glutathione and thioredoxin [19]. However, to date, there are no studies evaluating whether mutant KRAS similarly reprograms glutamine metabolism genes in NSCLC for redox balance and whether this may be a potential mechanism to attenuate ionizing radiation (IR)-induced ROS and DNA damage. Therefore, we characterized glutamine metabolism genes in mutant vs wild-type KRAS NSCLC both in vitro and in vivo, demonstrated the necessity of ME1 in mutant, but not wild-type, KRAS cell lines, and demonstrated that ME1 gene expression is a predictive marker in the treatment response to radiation therapy in a cohort NSCLC patients.
Fig. 1

Mutant KRAS is associated with ME1 and GOT1 expression in NSCLC. a Model of mutant KRAS-reprogrammed glutamine utilization (red). GLS1 = glutaminase 1; GLUD1 = glutamate dehydrogenase 1; GOT2 = mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase; ASP = aspartate; GOT1 = cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase; OAA = oxaloacetate; MDH1 = malate dehydrogenase 1; ME1 = malic enzyme 1; GSR = glutathione disulfide reductase. b When fed doxycycline, the mice develop lung tumors that are dependent on constitutive KRAS expression [20]. Within 48 h of doxycycline withdrawal, KRAS expression was extinguished and whole-genome gene expression analyses of lung tumors were performed. Consistent with mutant KRAS-driven reprogramming of glutamine metabolism, ME1 and GOT1 levels were up-regulated when KRAS was induced vs 48 h extinction with doxycycline withdrawl. c KRAS induction upregulated ME1 mRNA in mouse doxycycline inducible KRAS embryonic fibroblasts derived from the transgenic mice. d mRNA expression of ME1 in mutant KRAS vs wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines. Mutant KRAS lines: A549, CALU6, NCIH1155, NCIH1373, NCIH1385, NCIH1573, NCIH2030, NCIH2122, NCIH2347, NCIH460 and NCIH647. Wild-type KRAS lines: CALU3, HCC2108, HCC2279, HCC2935, HCC4006, NCIH322, NCIH520, NCIH522, NCIH596, NCIH661 and NCIH838. e NSCLC cell line dependencies on ME1 based on ATARiS gene phenotype value assessed from Project Achilles. Black bars = mutant KRAS cell. White bars = wild-type KRAS cell. Mutant KRAS lines: A549, CALU1, CORL23, HCC44, NCIH1650, NCIH1792, NCIH2122, NCIH23 and NCIH441. Wild-type KRAS lines: HCC2814, HCC827, NCIH1299, NCIH1437, NCIH1975, NCIH661, NCIH838 and HCC827GR5. f-g Seven day clonogenic survival assay of H522 and HCC44 with RNAi knockdown of ME1. h ME1 western blot in H522; band at 64 kDa. All results were compared using Student’s t-tests as indicated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < .001

Mutant KRAS is associated with ME1 and GOT1 expression in NSCLC. a Model of mutant KRAS-reprogrammed glutamine utilization (red). GLS1 = glutaminase 1; GLUD1 = glutamate dehydrogenase 1; GOT2 = mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase; ASP = aspartate; GOT1 = cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase; OAA = oxaloacetate; MDH1 = malate dehydrogenase 1; ME1 = malic enzyme 1; GSR = glutathione disulfide reductase. b When fed doxycycline, the mice develop lung tumors that are dependent on constitutive KRAS expression [20]. Within 48 h of doxycycline withdrawal, KRAS expression was extinguished and whole-genome gene expression analyses of lung tumors were performed. Consistent with mutant KRAS-driven reprogramming of glutamine metabolism, ME1 and GOT1 levels were up-regulated when KRAS was induced vs 48 h extinction with doxycycline withdrawl. c KRAS induction upregulated ME1 mRNA in mouse doxycycline inducible KRAS embryonic fibroblasts derived from the transgenic mice. d mRNA expression of ME1 in mutant KRAS vs wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines. Mutant KRAS lines: A549, CALU6, NCIH1155, NCIH1373, NCIH1385, NCIH1573, NCIH2030, NCIH2122, NCIH2347, NCIH460 and NCIH647. Wild-type KRAS lines: CALU3, HCC2108, HCC2279, HCC2935, HCC4006, NCIH322, NCIH520, NCIH522, NCIH596, NCIH661 and NCIH838. e NSCLC cell line dependencies on ME1 based on ATARiS gene phenotype value assessed from Project Achilles. Black bars = mutant KRAS cell. White bars = wild-type KRAS cell. Mutant KRAS lines: A549, CALU1, CORL23, HCC44, NCIH1650, NCIH1792, NCIH2122, NCIH23 and NCIH441. Wild-type KRAS lines: HCC2814, HCC827, NCIH1299, NCIH1437, NCIH1975, NCIH661, NCIH838 and HCC827GR5. f-g Seven day clonogenic survival assay of H522 and HCC44 with RNAi knockdown of ME1. h ME1 western blot in H522; band at 64 kDa. All results were compared using Student’s t-tests as indicated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < .001

Mutant KRAS is associated with ME1 and GOT1 expression in NSCLC

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of wild-type vs mutant KRAS NSCLC cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) revealed that genes involved in glutamine dependent redox balance (ME1 and GOT1) were significantly upregulated in mutant KRAS cell lines with normalized enrichment scores (NES) >1.48 (Table 1, Additional file 1: Figure S1A).
Table 1

GSEA results for mutant vs. wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines

NameNESGenesNOM p-val
NITROGEN_METABOLISM1.59GLS.001
GLUTAMATE_METABOLISM1.59GOT1, GOT2, GLS.001
CARBON_FIXATION1.48ME1, ME3, GOT1, GOT2, MDH1.037
GSEA results for mutant vs. wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines Next, we utilized gene expression data (GSE40606) of a tetracycline operator-regulated Tet-op-KRAS; p53 transgenic mouse model of NSCLC to examine mRNA expression in the KRAS induced (“ON”) and extinguished (“OFF”) states (Fig. 1b). When fed doxycycline, the mice develop lung tumors that are dependent on constitutive KRAS expression [20]. Within 48 h of doxycycline withdrawal, KRAS expression was extinguished and whole-genome gene expression analyses of lung tumors were performed. Consistent with our cell line results, ME1 and GOT1 levels were significantly upregulated when KRAS (n = 4 mice) was induced vs 48 h extinction with doxycycline withdrawal (n = 4 mice) (Fig. 1b). We found that KRAS induction similarly upregulated ME1 and GOT1 mRNA in mouse doxycycline inducible KRAS embryonic fibroblasts derived from the transgenic mice (Fig. 1c, Additional file 1: Figure S1B). Next, we measured mRNA levels of ME1 and GOT1 in 11 mutant and 11 wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines and found both genes to be significantly upregulated in the mutant cell lines (Fig. 1d, Additional file 1: Figure S1C). Next, to determine if mutant KRAS NSCLC cell lines relied on ME1 for survival, we analyzed 17 NSCLC cell lines from the Project Achilles database, an openly accessible platform of large-scale functional RNAi screens of cancer cell lines to identify genes that affect cell survival [21]. We found that 7 out of 9 mutant KRAS cell lines relied on ME1 for viability, while ME1 was dispensable in all but one of the wild-type cell lines (Fig. 1e). To verify these results, we knocked down ME1 (Fig. 1h) in H522, a wild-type KRAS line, and in HCC44, a mutant KRAS line. Using clonogenic survival assays, we found that ME1 loss rendered HCC44, but not H522, unable to form visible colonies (Fig. 1f, g). Taken together, our analyses indicate that mutant KRAS is associated with ME1 gene expression in NSCLC and that ME1 is an essential viability gene in mutant, but not wild-type, KRAS cell lines. In support of this observation, ME1 is a known NRF2 transcriptional target, which itself is positively regulated by mutant KRAS signaling via the MAPK pathway [22, 23].

Targeting glutamine metabolism sensitizes mutant KRAS NSCLC cell lines to radiation treatment

Mutant KRAS HCC44 and wild-type KRAS H522 cells were grown in Gln-free or Gln-containing (2 mM) media for 16 h, then exposed to ionizing radiation and allowed to form colonies for 7 days. Short-term Gln deprivation did not significantly alter clonogenic survival on its own, but did sensitize HCC44 and not H522 cells to radiation, at normally sub-lethal doses (Fig. 2a, b). Using this short term glutamine deprivation protocol, we next screened the mutant KRAS NSCLC cell lines H2009, H1573 and A549; and the wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines H661, H322 and H596 (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, we found that upon glutamine deprivation, mutant, but not wild-type, KRAS lines were sensitized to radiation (Fig. 2c). To pharmacologically mimic these results, we pre-treated HCC44 and H522 with the glutaminase 1 (GLS1) inhibitor, CB-839 [24], for 48 h at 1 μM followed by radiation treatment. Consistent with our glutamine deprivation results, HCC44, but not H522, was sensitized to radiation treatment (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2

Targeting glutamine metabolism sensitizes mutant KRAS NSCLC cell lines to radiation treatment. a, b Seven day clonogenic survival of HCC44 or H522 after radiation treatment after growth in either complete media or Gln deprived media for 16 h. c Clonogenic survival screen of mutant KRAS (H2009, H1573 and A549) or wild-type KRAS (H661, H322 and H596) NSCLC cell lines grown in either complete media or Gln deprived media for 16 h followed by treatment with 2 Gy of ionizing radiation. d Clonogenic survival of HCC44 and H522 pre-treated with 1 μM CB-839 for 48 h followed by treatment with various doses of ionizing radiation. All results were compared using Student’s t-tests as indicated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < .001

Targeting glutamine metabolism sensitizes mutant KRAS NSCLC cell lines to radiation treatment. a, b Seven day clonogenic survival of HCC44 or H522 after radiation treatment after growth in either complete media or Gln deprived media for 16 h. c Clonogenic survival screen of mutant KRAS (H2009, H1573 and A549) or wild-type KRAS (H661, H322 and H596) NSCLC cell lines grown in either complete media or Gln deprived media for 16 h followed by treatment with 2 Gy of ionizing radiation. d Clonogenic survival of HCC44 and H522 pre-treated with 1 μM CB-839 for 48 h followed by treatment with various doses of ionizing radiation. All results were compared using Student’s t-tests as indicated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < .001

GOT1 and ME1 expression predicts response to radiation therapy in NSCLC patients

To expand our in vivo and in vitro findings into a clinical context, we analyzed mutant KRAS status, tumor mRNA expression and RECIST outcomes data from the TCGA in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) NSCLC patients who were treated with IR (patient characteristics Additional file 2: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2, https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/tcgaCancerDetails.jsp?diseaseType=LUAD&diseaseName=Lungadenocarcinoma) [25]. Of the 14 LUAD NSCLC patients who had a complete response (CR) to IR treatment, ~93 % (13/14) of the patient’s tumors were wild-type KRAS, while only ~7 % (1/14) of the tumors were mutant KRAS, suggesting that wild-type KRAS tumors may be more radiosensitive compared to mutant KRAS tumors, consistent with previous reports (Fig. 3a) [6-12]. ME1 and GOT1 expression levels were significantly elevated in those patients who had progressive disease (PD) when treated with IR vs patients who demonstrated a CR after radiation therapy (Fig. 3b, c). Furthermore, we assessed overall survival outcomes in IR treated NSCLC patients (n = 73) grouped into high or low GOT1 and ME1 expressers. Interestingly, we found that patients with high expression of GOT1 or ME1 had significantly worse prognosis over a 140 month time period when compared to low GOT1 or ME1 expressers (Fig. 3d, e). Lastly, we did not observe a significant median survival difference between high and low GOT1/ME1 expressers in NSCLC patients who received chemotherapy, but not IR (Additional file 4: Figure S2A, B). Taken together, this suggests that ME1 and GOT1 are predictors to radiation, but not chemotherapeutic, response in NSCLC.
Fig. 3

GOT1 and ME1 expression predicts response to radiation therapy in NSCLC patients. a Percent of complete responders to ionizing radiation (IR) in NSCLC patients separated based on KRAS status. Total number of complete responders in TCGA database = 14; wild-type KRAS = 13, mutant KRAS responders = 1. OR = odds ratio. Results compared using Fisher’s exact test. b, c ME1 and GOT1 log2 mRNA expression levels with calculated mean from TCGA NSCLC patients prior to radiation treatment with associated patient outcome after radiation treatment, CR = complete response, disappearance of all target lesions; PD = progressive disease, >20 % increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Multiple probes integrated for each gene. d, e Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves in IR-treated NSCLC patients from KMPLOT database separated into high and low GOT1 and ME1 expression. Total number of NSCLC patients analyzed = 73; number of patients with high expression: ME1 = 40, GOT1 = 45; number of patients with low expression: ME1 = 33, GOT1 = 28. All results were compared using Student’s t-tests or a Cox regression analysis unless otherwise stated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < .001

GOT1 and ME1 expression predicts response to radiation therapy in NSCLC patients. a Percent of complete responders to ionizing radiation (IR) in NSCLC patients separated based on KRAS status. Total number of complete responders in TCGA database = 14; wild-type KRAS = 13, mutant KRAS responders = 1. OR = odds ratio. Results compared using Fisher’s exact test. b, c ME1 and GOT1 log2 mRNA expression levels with calculated mean from TCGA NSCLC patients prior to radiation treatment with associated patient outcome after radiation treatment, CR = complete response, disappearance of all target lesions; PD = progressive disease, >20 % increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Multiple probes integrated for each gene. d, e Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves in IR-treated NSCLC patients from KMPLOT database separated into high and low GOT1 and ME1 expression. Total number of NSCLC patients analyzed = 73; number of patients with high expression: ME1 = 40, GOT1 = 45; number of patients with low expression: ME1 = 33, GOT1 = 28. All results were compared using Student’s t-tests or a Cox regression analysis unless otherwise stated. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < .001

Conclusions

This multi-database translational study is the first to identify mutant KRAS associated glutamine metabolism genes, GOT1 and ME1, as potential radioresistance biomarkers in NSCLC. Our study revealed that elevated expression of GOT1 or ME1 is a highly predictive biomarker in radiation treatment, but not chemotherapeutic, outcomes. Additionally, ~93 % of patients with a complete response to IR treatment harbored wild-type KRAS in their tumors. To explain these observations, we hypothesize that KRAS-reprogrammed glutamine flux through GOT1 and ME1 is critical to maintain cytosolic NADPH levels for redox balance and lipid synthesis in NSCLC. In the face of ROS stress, as observed with IR treatment, NADPH is preferentially used to maintain reduced glutathione and thioredoxin 1 to protect cells from ROS damage [19]. In this context, KRAS may reprogram NSCLC glutamine metabolism similar to that observed in pancreatic cancer to maintain redox balance, thus providing an oncogene driven mechanism of radioresistance. While there are currently no known specific inhibitors of ME1 or GOT1, targeting upstream glutamine utilization via glutaminase 1 (GLS1, Fig. 1a) inhibition (with BPTES or CB-839) may blunt downstream utilization of glutamine/glutamate through GOT1 and ME1, thus depleting tumor, but not normal tissue, NADPH/GSH production, leading to tumor-specific radiosensitivity while sparing normal tissue [24].

Materials and methods

Databases

GSEA of mutant vs wild-type KRAS NSCLC cell lines was completed using the Broad Institute’s publically available Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) (http://www.broadinstitute.org/ccle) [26]. Transgenic mouse data was obtained through GEO Series accession number GSE40606 at Transgenic mouse data was obtained through GEO Series accession number GSE40606. We obtained NSCLC expression, mutation, treatment and outcomes patient data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) using the lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) dataset (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/tcgaCancerDetails.jsp?diseaseType=LUAD&diseaseName=Lung adenocarcinoma) [25]. Level 2, tumor somatic mutation data was obtained for KRAS for each patient in the analysis (Fig. 3a). Level 2, normalized gene expression data was obtained for GOT1 and ME1 for each patient in the analysis (Fig. 3b, c). Patient characteristics are shown in Additional file 2: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2. Cell line gene dependency data was obtained from Broad Institute’s Project Achilles (http://www.broadinstitute.org/achilles) [21].

Kaplan-Meier statistics

Survival analysis in radiation treated NSCLC patients (n = 73) was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier Plotter webtool (kmplot.com) [27]. Briefly, kmplot segregates each gene into percentile of expression between the lower and upper quartiles and the best performing threshold is used as the final cutoff in a univariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival plot and the hazard ratio with 95 % confidence intervals and logrank P value is calculated with the Bioconductor package in R.

Ethical approval and consent

All human data is sourced through The Cancer Genome Atlas (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/), no patients were approached for this study. No consent and no ethical approval were required to utilize this database.

Survival assay

For clonogenic survival assays, cells were trypsinized and plated onto 6-well plates at 100, 500, or 1000 cells per well in 2 ml of complete media, Gln deprived media for 16 h or complete media containing 1 μM CB-839 for 48 h. Cells were then exposed to IR (at various doses as indicated), allowed to grow for 7 days, washed with PBS and stained with crystal violet solution. Colonies with >50 normal appearing cells were counted and percent survival calculated and graphed with dose.

RNAi transfection

For siRNA transfection, cells were plated in 10 cm plates at 2 × 105 cells per plate and transfected with either control siRNA or siRNA against ME1 for 48 h followed by clonogenic survival assay.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Radical radiotherapy for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer in patients not sufficiently fit for or declining surgery (medically inoperable).

Authors:  N P Rowell; C J Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

2.  Increased radioresistance via G12S K-Ras by compensatory upregulation of MAPK and PI3K pathways in epithelial cancer.

Authors:  Annette Affolter; Martynas Drigotas; Kai Fruth; Irene Schmidtmann; Christoph Brochhausen; Wolf J Mann; Jürgen Brieger
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  H-RAS V12-induced radioresistance in HCT116 colon carcinoma cells is heregulin dependent.

Authors:  Rubén W Carón; Adly Yacoub; Xiaoyu Zhu; Clint Mitchell; Song Iy Han; Takehiko Sasazuki; Senji Shirasawa; Michael P Hagan; Steven Grant; Paul Dent
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Human pancreatic cancer tumors are nutrient poor and tumor cells actively scavenge extracellular protein.

Authors:  Jurre J Kamphorst; Michel Nofal; Cosimo Commisso; Sean R Hackett; Wenyun Lu; Elda Grabocka; Matthew G Vander Heiden; George Miller; Jeffrey A Drebin; Dafna Bar-Sagi; Craig B Thompson; Joshua D Rabinowitz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Radiation dose in non-small cell lung cancer: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Thomas J Dilling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Antitumor activity of the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Matt I Gross; Susan D Demo; Jennifer B Dennison; Lijing Chen; Tania Chernov-Rogan; Bindu Goyal; Julie R Janes; Guy J Laidig; Evan R Lewis; Jim Li; Andrew L Mackinnon; Francesco Parlati; Mirna L M Rodriguez; Peter J Shwonek; Eric B Sjogren; Timothy F Stanton; Taotao Wang; Jinfu Yang; Frances Zhao; Mark K Bennett
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  The mutational landscapes of genetic and chemical models of Kras-driven lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter M K Westcott; Kyle D Halliwill; Minh D To; Mamunur Rashid; Alistair G Rust; Thomas M Keane; Reyno Delrosario; Kuang-Yu Jen; Kay E Gurley; Christopher J Kemp; Erik Fredlund; David A Quigley; David J Adams; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Online survival analysis software to assess the prognostic value of biomarkers using transcriptomic data in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Balázs Győrffy; Pawel Surowiak; Jan Budczies; András Lánczky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Overview on how oncogenic Kras promotes pancreatic carcinogenesis by inducing low intracellular ROS levels.

Authors:  Bo Kong; Chengjia Qia; Mert Erkan; Jörg Kleeff; Christoph W Michalski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Pancreatic cancers rely on a novel glutamine metabolism pathway to maintain redox balance.

Authors:  Costas A Lyssiotis; Jaekyoung Son; Lewis C Cantley; Alec C Kimmelman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.534

View more
  24 in total

1.  Targeting autophagy to modulate cell survival: a comparative analysis in cancer, normal and embryonic cells.

Authors:  Aleksandra Divac Rankov; Mila Ljujić; Marija Petrić; Dragica Radojković; Milica Pešić; Jelena Dinić
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 2.  Malic enzyme 1 (ME1) in the biology of cancer: it is not just intermediary metabolism.

Authors:  Frank A Simmen; Iad Alhallak; Rosalia C M Simmen
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.098

3.  MicroRNA-30a attenuates mutant KRAS-driven colorectal tumorigenesis via direct suppression of ME1.

Authors:  Hongxing Shen; Chuan Xing; Kaisa Cui; Yunxiao Li; Jinxiang Zhang; Runlei Du; Xiaodong Zhang; Youjun Li
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  Malic Enzyme 1 Absence in Synovial Sarcoma Shifts Antioxidant System Dependence and Increases Sensitivity to Ferroptosis Induction with ACXT-3102.

Authors:  Caitlyn B Brashears; Bethany C Prudner; Richa Rathore; Katharine E Caldwell; Carina A Dehner; Jane L Buchanan; Sara E S Lange; Neal Poulin; Jennifer K Sehn; Jason Roszik; Dirk Spitzer; Kevin B Jones; Regis O'Keefe; Torsten O Nielsen; Eric B Taylor; Jason M Held; William Hawkins; Brian A Van Tine
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 13.801

5.  Inhibition of pyruvate carboxylase by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D promotes oxidative stress in early breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Tomasz Wilmanski; Xuanzhu Zhou; Wei Zheng; Aparna Shinde; Shawn S Donkin; Michael Wendt; John R Burgess; Dorothy Teegarden
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Metabolic Adaptation to Nutritional Stress in Human Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Masamitsu Konno; Naohiro Nishida; Toshinori Sueda; Kozo Noguchi; Hidetoshi Matsui; Hugh Colvin; Koichi Kawamoto; Jun Koseki; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Noriko Gotoh; Fumio Matsuda; Taroh Satoh; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Hiroshi Shimizu; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori; Hideshi Ishii
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Inhibition of malic enzyme 1 disrupts cellular metabolism and leads to vulnerability in cancer cells in glucose-restricted conditions.

Authors:  S Murai; A Ando; S Ebara; M Hirayama; Y Satomi; T Hara
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 7.485

8.  Repurposing of Cetuximab in antibody-directed chemotherapy-loaded nanoparticles in EGFR therapy-resistant pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  William J McDaid; Michelle K Greene; Michael C Johnston; Ellen Pollheimer; Peter Smyth; Kirsty McLaughlin; Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Robert M Straubinger; Daniel B Longley; Christopher J Scott
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 9.  The Metabolic Fates of Pyruvate in Normal and Neoplastic Cells.

Authors:  Edward V Prochownik; Huabo Wang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Simultaneous perturbation of the MAPK and the PI3K/mTOR pathways does not lead to increased radiosensitization.

Authors:  Sebastian Kuger; Michael Flentje; Cholpon S Djuzenova
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.