Literature DB >> 26173552

Home-made and commercial complementary meals in German infants: results of the DONALD study.

A Hilbig1, K Foterek2, M Kersting1, U Alexy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infant complementary food can be home-made or bought as ready-to-eat commercial products. The nutrient composition of commercial products is regularised in a European Commission guideline, whereas the preparation of home-made complementary meals is the responsibility of caregivers. In the present study, the composition of commercial and home-made complementary meals as eaten by healthy German infants was compared.
METHODS: Of 8226 complementary meals (74% commercial and 26% home-made) recorded in 1083, 3-day weighed dietary records from 396 participants (6-12 months old) of the German DONALD (DOrtmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed) study were analysed.
RESULTS: Median energy density (kcal 100 g(-1)) was highest in commercial and home-made cereal-milk meals (89 kcal 100 g(-1)). In home-made savoury and cereal-fruit meals, the energy density was significantly higher compared to their commercial counterparts. Median protein contents were highest in savoury and cereal-milk meals (>2.5 g 100 g(-1)) and dairy-fruit meals (2-4 g 100 g(-1)). Added sugars were found in less than a quarter of meals. Highest median sodium contents were found not only in commercial savoury meals (median 38 mg 100 g(-1)) and vegetable meals (32 mg 100 g(-1)), but also in home-made cereal-milk meals (36 mg 100 g(-1)). Both median fat and iron contents were higher in home-made meals compared to commercial savoury and cereal-fruit meals.
CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of the higher sodium content in commercial savoury meals for older infants, the lower fat content in commercial savoury and cereal-fruit meals, and the added sugar content in some commercial dairy-fruit meals, a comparison of commercial and home-made complementary meals did not reveal any serious inadequacy.
© 2015 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  commercial; complementary food; home-made; infant nutrition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26173552     DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  3 in total

1.  Are Homemade and Commercial Infant Foods Different? A Nutritional Profile and Food Variety Analysis in Spain.

Authors:  Maria Jose Bernal; Sergio Roman; Michelle Klerks; Juan Francisco Haro-Vicente; Luis Manuel Sanchez-Siles
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  Nutritional Adequacy of Commercial Complementary Cereals in Germany.

Authors:  Melissa A Theurich; Berthold Koletzko; Veit Grote
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  High sugar content of European commercial baby foods and proposed updates to existing recommendations.

Authors:  Jayne Hutchinson; Holly Rippin; Diane Threapleton; Jo Jewell; Haidi Kanamäe; Kristin Salupuu; Margherita Caroli; Angelo Antignani; Lucienne Pace; Charlene Vassallo; Britt Lande; Christina Hildonen; Ana Isabel Rito; Mariana Santos; Mojca Gabrijelcic Blenkus; Eszter Sarkadi-Nagy; Gergő Erdei; Janet E Cade; Joao Breda
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.092

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.