| Literature DB >> 26173111 |
Elisabet Selga1, Oscar Campuzano1, Mel Lina Pinsach-Abuin1, Alexandra Pérez-Serra1, Irene Mademont-Soler1, Helena Riuró1, Ferran Picó1, Mònica Coll1, Anna Iglesias1, Sara Pagans1, Georgia Sarquella-Brugada2, Paola Berne3, Begoña Benito3, Josep Brugada3, José M Porres4, Matilde López Zea5, Víctor Castro-Urda6, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano6, Ramon Brugada7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a rare genetic cardiac arrhythmia that can lead to sudden cardiac death in patients with a structurally normal heart. Genetic variations in SCN5A can be identified in approximately 20-25% of BrS cases. The aim of our work was to determine the spectrum and prevalence of genetic variations in a Spanish cohort diagnosed with BrS. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26173111 PMCID: PMC4501715 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographics of the 55 Spanish BrS patients included in the study.
The table shows the demographic characteristics of all the patients included in the study. Numbers in parentheses represent the relative percentages for each condition. T1 ECG refers to Type 1 BrS diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), obtained either spontaneously, or after drug challenge. The information regarding both the electrophysiological studies (EPS) and the treatment was not available for all the patients. Two of the patients that didn’t receive any treatment died, and were not taken into account for the calculations of percentages (+2 dead). ICD, intracardiac cardioverter defibrillator.
| Characteristic/Clinical presentation | Overall | Symptomatic Patients | Asymptomatic Patients |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Probands | 55 | 26 (47.3%) | 29 (52.7%) |
| Age at diagnosis, years | 41.9±13.3; range 5–68 | 37.7±14.3; range 5–63 | 45.7±11.4; range 24–68 |
| Males | 41 (74.5%) | 19/26 (73.1%) | 22/29 (75.9%) |
| Females | 14 (25.5%) | 7/26 (26.9%) | 7/29 (24.1%) |
| T1 ECG—spontaneous | 37 (67.3%) | 20/26 (76.9%) | 17/29 (58.6%) |
| T1 ECG—drug challenge | 18 (32.7%) | 6/26 (23.1%) | 12/29 (41.4%) |
| Family history of BrS | 25 (45.5%) | 11/26 (42.3%) | 14/29 (48.3%) |
| Positive EPS | 18/45 (40%) | 8/18 (44.4%) | 10/27 (37%) |
| Negative EPS | 27/45 (60%) | 10/18 (55.6%) | 17/27 (63%) |
| ICD | 32/46 (69.6%) | 20/23 (87%) | 12/23 (52.2%) |
| No treatment | 12/46 (26.1%); +2 dead | 1/23 (4.3%); +2 dead | 11/23 (47.8%) |
Characteristics of the Spanish BrS patients carrying rare genetic variations.
The table shows the clinical characteristics of the probands who carried rare genetic variations in SCN5A, SCN2B, or RANGRF. All of them are potentially pathogenic except that found in RANGRF, which is of unknown significance (see discussion). All the potentially pathogenic variations (PPVs) that had been previously reported, except p.P1725L and p.R1898C, had been identified in BrS patients. p.P1725L had been associated with Long QT Syndrome and p.R1898C was found in Exome Variant Server with a MAF of 0.0079%. No rare variations were identified in the control population. Patient’s age is expressed in years. Bold identifies the patients carrying variations that had not been described previously. M, male; F, female; S, syncope; ICD, intracardiac cardioverter defibrillator; UK, unknown; EPS, electrophysiological studies (+, positive response;-, negative response; N/P, not performed). The two patients who carried two PPVs each are identified by a and b, respectively.
| Proband Age/sex | Baseline ECG | Symptoms | ICD | EPS | Family historySCD | Family historyBrS | Gene | Aminoacidic change | Nucleotidic change | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28/M | Type 1 | S | Yes | + | No | Yes |
| p.R121W | c.361C>T | [ |
| 36/F | Type 1 | S | UK | UK | No | No |
| p.R222* | c.664C>T | [ |
| 44/Ma | Type 1 | None | Yes | + | No | No |
| p.P336L | c.1007C>T | [ |
| 45/M | Type 1 | S | Yes | - | No | No |
| p.D356N | c.1066G>A | [ |
| 37/F | Type 1 | S | Yes | - | Yes | Yes |
| p.R367H | c.1100G>A | [ |
| 33/M | Type 1 | None | Yes | - | No | Yes |
| p.G386R | c.1156G>A | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/M | Type 1 | S | Yes | N/P | No | Yes |
| p.Q573* | c.1717C>T | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31/M | Type 1 | S | Yes | - | No | Yes |
| p.I890T | c.2669T>C | [ |
| 49/M | Type 2 | None | No | - | No | Yes |
| p.S910L | c.2729C>T | [ |
| 43/M | Type 1 | None | Yes | + | No | Yes |
| p.R1232W | c.3694C>T | [ |
| 48/M | Type 2 | S | Yes | + | No | Yes |
| p.D1243N | c.3727G>A | [ |
| 38/Mb | Type 1 | None | Yes | - | No | Yes |
| intronic | c.3840+1G>A | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 44/Ma | Type 1 | None | Yes | + | No | No |
| p.I1660V | c.4978A>G | [ |
| 38/Mb | Type 1 | None | Yes | - | No | Yes |
| p.D1690N | c.5068G>A | [ |
| 38/M | Type 1 | S | Yes | - | No | No |
| p.P1725L | c.5174C>T | [ |
| 47/M | Type 3 | S | Yes | + | No | No |
| p.R1898C | c.5692C>T | [ |
| 47/F | Type 1 | S | Yes | + | No | No |
| p.D211G | c.632A>G | [ |
| 42/M | Type 2 | None | Yes | + | Yes | Yes |
| p.E61* | c.181G>T | [ |
Fig 1Characteristics of the probands carrying non-reported potentially pathogenic variations (PPVs) in SCN5A and their families.
Left: Electrocardiograms of the probands: (A) patient carrying the p.R569Pfs*151 variation, showing the ST elevation characteristic of BrS in V1 at the time of the flecainide test; (B) patient carrying the p.E625Rfs*95 variation, showing the spontaneous ST elevation characteristic of BrS in V1 and V2; and (C) patient carrying the p.R1623Efs*7 variation, showing the spontaneous ST elevation characteristic of BrS in V1 and V2. Middle: Family pedigrees. Open symbols designate clinically normal subjects, filled symbols mark clinically affected individuals and question marks identify subjects without an available clinical diagnosis. Plus signs indicate the carriers of the PPVs and minus signs, non-carriers. The crosses mark deceased individuals and arrows identify the proband. Right: Detail of the electropherograms obtained after SCN5A sequence analysis of a control subject (left panels) and of the probands (right panels).
Fig 2Influence of the phenotype on PPV discovery yield.
Bar graph comparing the PPV detection yield in 8 different clinical categories (stated below the graph). Each bar shows the total number of patients for each clinical category divided in those with a PPV (black) and those without an identified PPV (white). The number of patients (in brackets) and percentages are given. Pos, positive; Neg, negative; Spont, spontaneous type 1 BrS ECG; Drug, drug-induced type 1 BrS ECG; n, number of patients.
Fig 3Influence of the age on PPVs discovery yield.
(A) Pie charts showing the distribution of patients in the overall population as well as in the categories of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients regarding PPV discovery. The percentage and the number of patients (in brackets) are given for each group. The small pie charts correspond to the age distribution of patients with an identified PPV. (B) Bar graphs of the PPV detection yields obtained for each of the age groups (< 30 years, 30–50 years and > 50 years). Numbers inside each bar correspond to the number of patients carrying a PPV for each category and the percentages represent the variation detection yield.
Fig 4Nav1.5 channel scheme showing the relative position of the SCN5A PPVs identified in our cohort.
Open symbols indicate already described variations and closed symbols locate novel variations reported in this study. DI to DIV designate the 4 domains of the protein, and numbers 1–6 identify the different segments within each domain. Crosses mark the voltage sensor.