Literature DB >> 26172978

Off-Pump Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With a Heart Positioner: Direct Retraction for a Better Exposure.

Keita Kikuchi1, Dai Une, Koutaro Suzuki, Yoshiki Endo, Takayoshi Matsuyama, Shin-Ichi Osaka, Atsushi Kurata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lateral and inferior territories are difficult to expose during off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG). The use of cardiopulmonary bypass is required at times. We initiated a direct retraction method by using a cardiac positioner for a better exposure, in order to complete off-pump, multivessel MICS CABG safely.
METHODS: We recently initiated multivessel MICS CABG, performed via a 6- to 9-cm left thoracotomy. For distal anastomoses, the lateral pericardial edge was pulled to the chest wall to optimize exposure of the lateral and inferior area. Next, a single- or multisuction cardiac positioner was put on the sides of the target vessel through the small thoracotomy and pulled directly toward the incision. Finally, a distal anastomosis was made with an epicardial stabilizer via the thoracotomy, as in standard off-pump CABG.
RESULTS: There was no mortality or conversion to sternotomy. A total of 10 cases were targeted for off-pump multivessel MICS CABG with this approach. Nine were completed, while 1 still required pump assist. The average number of distal anastomoses was 2.8 ± 0.8. Two were successful off-pump quadruple bypass grafting with sequential anastomoses. All patients were discharged and remain well to this day.
CONCLUSIONS: Most multivessel MICS CABG was feasible without pump assist even at the initiation period. This approach is easy and helpful in providing good exposure of target vessels without requirement of additional incisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26172978     DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innovations (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-9845


  3 in total

1.  Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Xiaolong Ma; Qingyu Kong; Wei Xiao; Jiaji Liu; Liqun Chi; Junming Zhu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-06

2.  Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Jia-Ji Liu; Qing-Yu Kong; Bin You; Lin Liang; Wei Xiao; Xiao-Long Ma; Feng Pan; Li-Qun Chi
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Tachibana; Keita Kikuchi; Kouhei Narayama; Akihito Okawa; Yu Iwashiro; Ayaka Arihara; Akihiko Yamauchi
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-05-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.