Literature DB >> 26172972

Cue Integration: A Common Framework for Social Cognition and Physical Perception.

Jamil Zaki1.   

Abstract

Scientists examining how people understand other minds have long thought that this task must be something like how people perceive the physical world. This comparison has proven to be deeply generative, as models of physical perception and social cognition have evolved in parallel. In this article, I propose extending this classic analogy in a new direction by proposing cue integration as a common feature of social cognition and physical perception. When encountering complex social cues-which happens often-perceivers use multiple processes for understanding others' minds. Like physical senses (e.g., vision or audition), social cognitive processes have often been studied as though they operate in relative isolation. In the domain of physical perception, this assumption has broken down, following evidence that perception is instead characterized by pervasive integration of multisensory information. Such integration is, in turn, elegantly described by Bayesian inferential models. By adopting a similar cue integration framework, researchers can similarly understand and formally model the ways that we perceive others' minds based on complex social information.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cue integration; inference; perception; social cognition

Year:  2013        PMID: 26172972     DOI: 10.1177/1745691613475454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  26 in total

1.  Sensorimotor simulation and emotion processing: Impairing facial action increases semantic retrieval demands.

Authors:  Joshua D Davis; Piotr Winkielman; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A new perspective on proxy report: Investigating implicit processes of understanding through patient-proxy congruence.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Armon Ayandeh; Jonathan D Rodgers; Paul Duberstein; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Ralph H B Benedict
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  People learn other people's preferences through inverse decision-making.

Authors:  Alan Jern; Christopher G Lucas; Charles Kemp
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-06-26

Review 4.  Formalizing emotion concepts within a Bayesian model of theory of mind.

Authors:  Rebecca Saxe; Sean Dae Houlihan
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  The neural correlates of emotion alignment in social interaction.

Authors:  Kristin Prehn; Christoph W Korn; Malek Bajbouj; Gisela Klann-Delius; Winfried Menninghaus; Arthur M Jacobs; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Bayesian decision theory and navigation.

Authors:  Timothy P McNamara; Xiaoli Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-24

7.  Somatic engagement alters subsequent neurobehavioral correlates of affective mentalizing.

Authors:  Ofir Shany; Ayam Greental; Gadi Gilam; Daniella Perry; Maya Bleich-Cohen; Moran Ovadia; Avihay Cohen; Gal Raz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex co-varies with revealed social preferences: evidence for person-invariant value.

Authors:  Jamil Zaki; Gilberto López; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The neural networks of subjectively evaluated emotional conflicts.

Authors:  Christiane S Rohr; Arno Villringer; Carolina Solms-Baruth; Elke van der Meer; Daniel S Margulies; Hadas Okon-Singer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Applying Probabilistic Programming to Affective Computing.

Authors:  Desmond C Ong; Harold Soh; Jamil Zaki; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Affect Comput       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 10.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.