Literature DB >> 26172966

Only One? The Default Interventionist Perspective as a Unimodel-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013).

Arie W Kruglanski1.   

Abstract

Evans and Stanovich (2013, this issue) defend the dual-processing theories of higher cognition after first criticizing them on fundamental grounds. To make that possible, they resurrect the very distinctions between the two alleged "types" of processing that they formerly had rejected. At the end, however, the default-interventionist model they embrace, seems similar to the single-process unimodel they contest.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Year:  2013        PMID: 26172966     DOI: 10.1177/1745691613483477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  5 in total

Review 1.  Associations do not energize behavior: on the forgotten legacy of Kurt Lewin.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; David Dignath
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-12-24

2.  Simple and rationale-providing SMS reminders to promote accelerometer use: a within-trial randomised trial comparing persuasive messages.

Authors:  Matti T J Heino; Keegan Knittle; Ari Haukkala; Tommi Vasankari; Nelli Hankonen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise.

Authors:  Bethany Growns; Kristy A Martire
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2020-05-21

4.  Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical.

Authors:  Samuel C Bellini-Leite
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-21

5.  Beyond type 1 vs. type 2 processing: the tri-dimensional way.

Authors:  Alexandra L Varga; Kai Hamburger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.