Anthony Richards1,2, Unine Herbst1,2, Jane Manalang1,2, Selvan Pather1,2,3, Samir Saidi1,2,3, Trevor Tejada-Berges1,2,3, Kris Tan4, Paul Williams3,4, Jonathan Carter1,2,3. 1. Lifehouse Gynaecology Oncology Group, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Endocrinology Laboratory, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) has been proposed as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Using HE4 and CA125, the risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) has been shown to be effective in the stratification of epithelial ovarian cancer risk. AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of HE4 and ROMA in the diagnosis of malignancy of women presenting with a complex pelvic mass in an Australian population and to compare it with CA125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective recruitment of women was conducted between October 2012 and March 2014 (n = 50). CA125 and HE4 serum concentrations were collected and stored for subsequent analysis. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for HE4, CA125, ROMA and the RMI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curves (AUC) were also calculated for comparison. RESULTS: There was a higher HE4 level in women with ovarian cancer compared with women with benign pathology (P = 0.008), and this observation was seen in benign versus stage 1 ovarian cancer women (P = 0.025). HE4 had a better specificity than CA125 for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in all women (P = 0.022), and this effect was also observed in premenopausal women (P = 0.012). Furthermore, the ROC-AUC for HE4 was superior than CA125 in all women (P = 0.0451). The ROMA algorithm was not inferior to the RMI calculation in this population. CONCLUSIONS: In an Australian population, HE4 and ROMA are useful in the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.
BACKGROUND:Humanepididymis protein 4 (HE4) has been proposed as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Using HE4 and CA125, the risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) has been shown to be effective in the stratification of epithelial ovarian cancer risk. AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of HE4 and ROMA in the diagnosis of malignancy of women presenting with a complex pelvic mass in an Australian population and to compare it with CA125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective recruitment of women was conducted between October 2012 and March 2014 (n = 50). CA125 and HE4 serum concentrations were collected and stored for subsequent analysis. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for HE4, CA125, ROMA and the RMI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curves (AUC) were also calculated for comparison. RESULTS: There was a higher HE4 level in women with ovarian cancer compared with women with benign pathology (P = 0.008), and this observation was seen in benign versus stage 1 ovarian cancerwomen (P = 0.025). HE4 had a better specificity than CA125 for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in all women (P = 0.022), and this effect was also observed in premenopausal women (P = 0.012). Furthermore, the ROC-AUC for HE4 was superior than CA125 in all women (P = 0.0451). The ROMA algorithm was not inferior to the RMI calculation in this population. CONCLUSIONS: In an Australian population, HE4 and ROMA are useful in the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Authors: Khawla Al Musalhi; Manal Al Kindi; Faiza Al Aisary; Fatma Ramadhan; Thuraya Al Rawahi; Khalsa Al Hatali; Waad-Allah Mula-Abed Journal: Oman Med J Date: 2016-09
Authors: Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 3.437